6 research outputs found
Expected versus observed survival in the external validation cohort.
<p>Patients were divided into quartiles at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the risk score. Quartile 1 coincided with ITA.LI.CA score ≤ 1, quartile 2 with score 2–3, quartile 3 with score 4–5, quartile 4 with score > 5.</p
Patient characteristics of the three groups.
<p>Patient characteristics of the three groups.</p
Expected versus observed survival in the internal validation cohort.
<p>Patients were divided into quartiles at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the risk score. Quartile 1 coincided with ITA.LI.CA score ≤ 1, quartile 2 with score 2–3, quartile 3 with score 4–5, quartile 4 with score > 5.</p
Discrimination ability of the integrated ITA.LI.CA prognostic system and comparison with other staging systems in the training and internal validation cohorts (<i>n</i> = 5,183) stratified based on study period.
<p>Discrimination ability of the integrated ITA.LI.CA prognostic system and comparison with other staging systems in the training and internal validation cohorts (<i>n</i> = 5,183) stratified based on study period.</p
Expected versus observed survival in the training cohort.
<p>Patients were divided into quartiles at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles of the risk score. Quartile 1 coincided with ITA.LI.CA score ≤ 1, quartile 2 with score 2–3, quartile 3 with score 4–5, quartile 4 with score >5.</p