14 research outputs found

    Hip Arthroplasty

    Get PDF
    Hip replacement is one of the most performed surgical procedures in orthopedic hip surgery. Through this surgery, the patient returns to most of his normal life and a life without pain. The primary indication for a hip arthroplasty remains osteoarthritis (OA). OA is a degenerative disease that affects synovial joints. A successful surgery is always preceded by good planning. The planning in turn takes into account the analysis of the patient and his physical examination and the radiological image. But also, the surgical planning must take into account another important factor, the choice of the surgical approach. In this chapter, the authors script a revision on the history of hip arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty approaches, implant types, complications associated with hip arthroplasty, outcomes, and perspectives to the future. We wish you a good reading

    Strategy to avoid vascular injuries in revision total hip arthroplasty with intrapelvic implants

    Get PDF
    Aims: Our objective was describing an algorithm to identify and prevent vascular injury in patients with intrapelvic components. Methods: Patients were defined as at risk to vascular injuries when components or cement migrated 5 mm or more beyond the ilioischial line in any of the pelvic incidences (anteroposterior and Judet view). In those patients, a serial investigation was initiated by a CT angiography, followed by a vascular surgeon evaluation. The investigation proceeded if necessary. The main goal was to assure a safe tissue plane between the hardware and the vessels. Results: In ten at-risk patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty and submitted to our algorithm, six were recognized as being high risk to vascular injury during surgery. In those six high-risk patients, a preventive preoperative stent was implanted before the orthopaedic procedure. Four patients needed a second reinforcing stent to protect and to maintain the vessel anatomy deformed by the intrapelvic implants. Conclusion: The evaluation algorithm was useful to avoid blood vessels injury during revision total hip arthroplasty in high-risk patients

    Acetabular revision in total hip arthroplasty with tantalum augmentation and lyophilized bovine xenograft

    No full text
    Abstract Objective To evaluate a mixed technique of acetabular reconstruction, which uses trabecular metal in the form of tantalum augments associated with lyophilized bovine xenograft. Methods Fifteen patients were evaluated prospectively, who underwent acetabular reconstruction with impacted lyophilized bovine xenograft associated with the use of tantalum augments. The main outcome was the failure of the tantalum-bone interface. Results The population had a mean age of 58.33 years ± 14.27; the majority was female, 80%. Of the total subjects, 66.7% were operated for failure in primary arthroplasty. The mean follow-up time was 45.2 months ± 11.39. The failure rate of the method in the period and population studied was 6.7%. Conclusion An extremely high index (93.3%) of success was observed in an average time of 45.2 months of follow-up. Data were comparable to current literature, demonstrating that the technique employed and proposed is adequate for hip reconstruction in young patients

    Is there a relationship between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and bilaterality in patients with coxarthrosis?

    No full text
    ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and the presence of signs of arthrosis in both hips in patients followed at this medical center. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective study through the analysis of medical records and database review of patients over 18 years of age with hip arthrosis, followed at the outpatient clinic of this hospital. Results: Regarding the analysis of the Mann-Whitney test to correlate the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and laterality, a bi-lateral test result of p = 0.036 was obtained, thus demonstrating a significant difference between the observed groups. When we analyzed the absolute values of neutrophils and lymphocytes, the authors obtained results of p = 0.14 and p = 0.24. Therefore, it was not possible to observe statistically significant differences between the absolute values in the two groups. Conclusion: Considering the interactions between the inflammatory mechanisms in osteoarthritis and the fact that the interaction between neutrophils and lymphocytes has differences in relation to the laterality of the coxarthrosis, it is hypothesized that the inflammatory etiology of unilateral and bilateral osteoarthritis could have different dynamics. However, more in-depth studies with flow cytometry are needed to assess the possible impact of these differences in the inflammatory mechanisms observed in this study
    corecore