14 research outputs found

    Blood pressure-lowering effects of nifedipine/candesartan combinations in high-risk individuals: Subgroup analysis of the DISTINCT randomised trial

    Get PDF
    The DISTINCT study (reDefining Intervention with Studies Testing Innovative Nifedipine GITS - Candesartan Therapy) investigated the efficacy and safety of nifedipine GITS/candesartan cilexetil combinations vs respective monotherapies and placebo in patients with hypertension. This descriptive sub-analysis examined blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects in high-risk participants, including those with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate<90 ml min-1, n=422), type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=202), hypercholesterolaemia (n=206) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (n=971), as well as the impact of gender, age and body mass index (BMI). Participants with grade I/II hypertension were randomised to treatment with nifedipine GITS (N) 20, 30, 60 mg and/or candesartan cilexetil (C) 4, 8, 16, 32 mg or placebo for 8 weeks. Mean systolic BP and diastolic BP reductions after treatment in high-risk participants were greater, overall, with N/C combinations vs respective monotherapies or placebo, with indicators of a dose-response effect. Highest rates of BP control (ESH/ESC 2013 guideline criteria) were also achieved with highest doses of N/C combinations in each high-risk subgroup. The benefits of combination therapy vs monotherapy were additionally observed in patient subgroups categorised by gender, age or BMI. All high-risk participants reported fewer vasodilatory adverse events in the pooled N/C combination therapy than the N monotherapy group. In conclusion, consistent with the DISTINCT main study outcomes, high-risk participants showed greater reductions in BP and higher control rates with N/C combinations compared with respective monotherapies and lesser vasodilatory side-effects compared with N monotherapy

    Successful parathyroidectomy guided by intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring for primary hyperparathyroidism is preserved in mild and moderate renal insufficiency

    No full text
    The effect of altered parathyroid hormone metabolism in renal insufficiency on intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring during parathyroidectomy is not well known. This study evaluates operative outcomes in patients undergoing parathyroidectomy guided by intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring for primary hyperparathyroidism with mild and moderate renal insufficiency. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data in 604 patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing parathyroidectomy guided by intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring was performed. Patients were stratified by stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD); those with overt secondary hyperparathyroidism (CKD stages IV and V) were excluded. Rates of bilateral neck exploration, multiglandular disease, and long-term operative outcomes, including success, failure, and recurrence were compared. Of the 604 patients, 38% (230/604) had normal renal function or stage I CKD, 44% (268/604) had stage II CKD, and 18% (106/604) had stage III CKD. Overall, there were no differences in the rates of bilateral neck exploration or multiglandular disease or in rates of operative success, failure, or recurrence in patients with normal renal function and stages I to III CKD. Parathyroidectomy guided by intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring is performed with high operative success uniformly in primary hyperparathyroidism patients with mild and moderate renal insufficiency with outcomes similar to those with normal renal function

    High perioperative morbidity and mortality in patients with malignant nonfunctional adrenal tumors

    No full text
    Both functional (hormone hypersecreting) and nonfunctional (nonhypersecreting) adrenal tumors can have benign or malignant pathology. This study compares perioperative in-hospital outcomes after adrenalectomy in patients with benign versus malignant nonfunctional primary adrenal tumors. A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was performed using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2006-2011) to identify patients who underwent unilateral open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy for nonfunctional primary adrenal tumors. Patients were subdivided by benign and malignant final pathology. Demographics, comorbidities, and perioperative complications were compared between groups using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression. Of 23,297 patients, 89.7% (n = 20,897) had benign tumors, whereas 10.3% (n = 2400) had malignant tumors. Those with malignant tumors had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores and were more likely to undergo adrenalectomy at high volume centers. For both laparoscopic and open approach, patients with malignant nonfunctional tumors had higher rates of intraoperative complications including vascular and splenic injury (P < 0.01), as well as postoperative complications including hematoma, shock, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, and pneumothorax (P < 0.01). In addition, the malignant group had higher rates of blood transfusions, longer hospital stay, and higher in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) than benign counterparts. On risk-adjusted multivariate analysis, malignant nonfunctional primary adrenal tumors were independently associated with increased risk of complications following adrenalectomy. Patients with malignant nonfunctional primary adrenal tumors have higher perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to patients with benign nonfunctional adrenal tumors. Such patients should be medically optimized before adrenalectomy, and surgeons must remain vigilant in preventing perioperative complications

    Intraoperative parathormone spikes during parathyroidectomy may be associated with multiglandular disease

    No full text
    The importance of intraoperative parathormone "spikes" during parathyroidectomy remains unclear. This study compared patients with and without intraoperative parathormone spikes during parathyroidectomy using the criterion of a > 50% parathormone and determined the effect of intraoperative parathormone spikes on operative outcome. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on 683 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy guided by intraoperative parathormone monitoring. An intraoperative parathormone "spike value" was calculated by subtracting the preincision intraoperative parathormone value from the pre-excision intraoperative parathormone value (SV = PE - PI). An intraoperative parathormone spike was defined as having a positive spike value ≥9 pg/mL (≥10th percentile of all spike values). Of 683 patients, 224 (33%) had intraoperative parathormone spikes and a greater rate of multiglandular disease (8% vs. 3%, P < 0.05) and bilateral neck exploration (10% vs. 5%, P < 0.05) compared with patients without intraoperative parathormone spikes. Overall, there were no differences between parathyroidectomy patients with and without intraoperative parathormone spikes in terms of operative success (98.2% vs. 98.0%), failure (1.8% vs. 2.0%), or recurrence rates (0.4% vs. 1.3%). Although the presence of intraoperative parathormone spikes may increase suspicion for multiglandular disease, the ability of intraoperative parathormone monitoring to predict operative success after parathyroidectomy is not affected by spikes
    corecore