Interference of glucose and total protein on Jaffe-based creatinine methods : mind the covolume

not availabl

Prevalence of asthma and COPD and blood eosinophil count in a middle-aged Belgian population

Various phenotypes exist in asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). These are important to identify in order to guide treatment decisions. We aim to investigate the prevalence and clinical characteristics of obstructive airway diseases in the middle-aged population. We estimated the prevalence of COPD and/or asthma in the Asklepios cohort study (Belgium), using information from the third European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS3), medical records, and spirometry. Respiratory symptoms, respiratory medication, and current disease status distinguished clinical from sub-clinical cases. In addition, we compared the blood eosinophil count/mu L (median [IQR]) between cases and controls. Of the 2221 participants (mean age 56.1 +/- 5.9 years; 48.7% males), 138 (6.2%) participants had clinical current asthma, 22 (1.0%) participants had sub-clinical ever asthma, 102 (4.6%) had sub-clinical spirometry-defined COPD, 104 (4.6%) participants had clinical spirometry-confirmed COPD, and 11 (0.5%) had asthma and COPD overlap (ACO). Clinical current asthma (160.0 [110.0-250.0]), sub-clinical ever asthma (170.0 [110.0-230.0]), and clinical COPD (160.0 [110.0-220.0])-but less sub-clinical COPD (140.0 [90.0-210.0])-had higher eosinophil counts, compared to controls (130.0 [80.0-200.0]). We conclude that obstructive airway diseases are prevalent in the middle-aged Asklepios cohort. Moreover, the systemic eosinophil count is increased in clinical COPD cases, and in asthma cases regardless of clinical remission

Silence of the limbs: pharmacological symptomatic treatment of intermittent claudication

Several oral "vasoactive" drugs claim to increase walking capacity in patients with intermittent claudication (IC). Naftidrofuryl, cilostazol, buflomedil, and pentoxifylline are the most studied molecules. Although spanning several decades, several studies underlying these claims were not properly designed, underpowered or showed clinically doubtful outcomes. The evidence for these "vasoactive" drugs has always been received with scepticism, creating the need for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This brief review discusses the benefit-risk assessment of vasoactive drugs, by applying a systematic review to evaluate randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Oral naftidrofuryl and cilostazol have an acceptable safety profile as well as sustained evidence (documented by Cochrane analyses) of increased walking capacity. Subsequently, these drugs entered recommendations for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In contrast, buflomedil and pentoxifylline have limited and/or doubtful evidence to increase walking capacity. Moreover, there were safety concerns about the narrow therapeutic range of buflomedil. Most other "vasoactive" drugs were either inappropriately or insufficiently tested or showed no significant if not negative effects on IC. "Vasoactive" drugs are no substitutes for lifestyle or exercise therapy but are adjuvant treatment to the well-appreciated triad of cardiovascular prevention (antiplatelet agents, statins and ACE-inhibitors), of which statins in their own right have documented claims to significantly increase walking capacity. "Vasoactive" drugs may have a place in the pharmacological management of symptomatic PAD in addition to the basic cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, when revascularization is not indicated, when exercise therapy is not feasible or when there is still insufficient benefit

COVID-19 infections are also affected by human ACE1 D/I polymorphism

The number of victims of the COVID-19 pandemic shows important geographical differences. In this study, a number of human genetic polymorphisms were compared to the number of Covid-19 patients and Covid-19 mortality. Data from 33 countries were analyzed. Among the polymorphisms tested, the human angiotensine converting enzyme (ACE) polymorphism turned out to be a determinant factor in both prevalence and mortality. The present findings may partly explain why some countries are more affected than others by the Covid-19 pandemic