1 research outputs found

    Reactivity of a Cationic (C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)Ir<sup>III</sup>-Cyclometalated Phosphine Complex with Alkynes

    No full text
    The electrophilic cationic complex [(Ī·<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)Ā­IrĀ­(C<sup>āˆ§</sup>P)]<sup>+</sup>, which contains a metalated phosphine derived from PMeĀ­(Xyl)<sub>2</sub> (Xyl = 2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>), reacts at āˆ’60 Ā°C with the alkynes HCī—¼CH, PhCī—¼CH, and PhCī—¼CMe, with formation of the corresponding Ļ€ adducts [(Ī·<sup>5</sup>-C<sub>5</sub>Me<sub>5</sub>)Ā­IrĀ­(C<sup>āˆ§</sup>P)Ā­(Ī·<sup>2</sup>-alkyne)]<sup>+</sup>. Thermal activation of these complexes leads to products that result from the Cā€“C coupling of the alkyne and the Ļƒ Irā€“C bond of the metalated phosphine, whose nature depends markedly upon the alkyne involved. Thus, for HCī—¼CH the carbonā€“carbon bond -forming reaction leads to an iridium-bound alkene moiety as the thermodynamic product, whereas the analogous complexes derived from the bulkier PhCī—¼CH and PhCī—¼CMe alkynes undergo further transformation into allylic structures. Mechanistic studies supported by the use of PhCī—¼CD demonstrate the implication of an undetected vinylidene structure, Irī—»Cī—»CĀ­(H)Ā­Ph, in the key carbonā€“carbon bond-forming step of the PhCī—¼CH reaction system, whereas for the internal alkyne PhCī—¼CMe a migratory insertion mechanism is operative. However, no clear distinction between these two routes can be made for the Cā€“C bond-forming reaction for which HCī—¼CH is responsible
    corecore