Elevated systemic antibodies towards commensal gut microbiota in autoinflammatory condition

Article No. e3172Non peer reviewedPublisher PD

Predominant role of host genetics in controlling the composition of gut microbiota

Background: The human gastrointestinal tract is inhabited by a very diverse symbiotic microbiota, the composition of which depends on host genetics and the environment. Several studies suggested that the host genetics may influence the composition of gut microbiota but no genes involved in host control were proposed. We investigated the effects of the wild type and mutated alleles of the gene, which encodes the protein called pyrin, one of the regulators of innate immunity, on the composition of gut commensal bacteria. Mutations in MEFV lead to the autoinflammatory disorder, familial Mediterranean fever (FMF, MIM249100), which is characterized by recurrent self-resolving attacks of fever and polyserositis, with no clinical signs of disease in remission. Methodology/Principal Findings: A total of 19 FMF patients and eight healthy individuals were genotyped for mutations in the MEFV gene and gut bacterial diversity was assessed by sequencing 16S rRNA gene libraries and FISH analysis. These analyses demonstrated significant changes in bacterial community structure in FMF characterized by depletion of total numbers of bacteria, loss of diversity, and major shifts in bacterial populations within the Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla in attack. In remission with no clinical signs of disease, bacterial diversity values were comparable with control but still, the bacterial composition was substantially deviant from the norm. Discriminant function analyses of gut bacterial diversity revealed highly specific, well-separated and distinct grouping, which depended on the allele carrier statu

Comparison of 16S rRNA gene libraries derived from healthy controls and FMF patients in remission and attack.

*<p>p<0.01, comparison of remission vs. control libraries.</p>**<p>p<0.01, comparison of attack vs. control libraries.</p>***<p>p<0.01, comparison of remission vs. attack libraries.</p

Mean numbers of predominant bacteria in fecal samples of FMF patients in both stages of the disease and healthy controls detected by FISH.

<p>Mean count±SD.</p>*<p>Counts 10⁸ cells per gram of fecal specimen.</p>**<p>The percentage relative to the total number of cells determined by Eub338.</p>†<p>p<0.05 as compared to healthy controls.</p>††<p>p<0.01 as compared to healthy controls.</p

<i>MEFV</i> genotypes of FMF patients and control subjects and gut microbiota analysis methods applied.

<p>Control subjects denoted with prefix C; FMF patients denoted with prefix FMF.</p><p>Abbreviations: S, 16S library; F, FISH analysis; SR, 16S library in FMF remission; SA, 16S library in FMF attack; FR, FISH analysis in FMF remission; FA, FISH analysis in FMF attack; HT, heterozygote; HM, homozygote.</p>*<p>N/D, not detected.</p>**<p>N/A, not analyzed.</p

Collector's curves of the observed and estimated phylotype richness of 16S libraries.

<p>Collector's curves of the observed (shown in dark blue) and estimated (Chao1 (light blue) and ACE (red)) phylotype richness calculated for healthy subjects (A), FMF remission (B), and FMF attack (C) with the phylogenetic depth defined at 99% level.</p

Indices of diversity, richness and evenness and library coverage for 16S rRNA gene libraries.

<p>Calculations were made based on OTU definition at 99% sequence identity.</p>*<p>The values in parentheses are the 95% confidence intervals, which assess the precision of the richness estimates.</p

Classification table of correct estimates based on FISH variables.

<p>Statistical parameters of the discriminant model: Wilks's lambda coefficient – 0.045. Significance of the model: F (20,16) = 2.95; p<0.016.</p>*<p><i>apriori</i> probability of correct classification.</p

Discriminant function analysis of FISH data.

<p>Number of variables in model: 10; grouping - 3 groups. Wilks's lambda coefficient – 0.045; F-test - (20,16) = 2.95, p<0.016. Root 1, 2 – discriminant functions 1 and 2 (1^st and 2^nd canonical roots). Regions of group distribution are outlined by ellipses; healthy is shown in blue triangles, remission – in red circles, and attack – in green squares.</p