15 research outputs found

    Group differences of regional GM volumes in left hemisphere and their relationship with Multi-Scale GV.

    No full text
    <p>‘*’ indicates significant differences between the type 2 DM group (white) and controls (grey) in GM volumes (One-Way ANOVA); regional GM volumes in left hemisphere were correlated with Multi-Scale GV for diabetics and/or controls, blue indicates positive correlation, red indicates negative correlation with each GVC, G' = gyrus, ‘#’ indicates we found similar relationship between Multi-Scale GV and GM volumes in the right hemisphere (<i>r<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.26–074, <i>P</i><0.05). The bar graphs are presented as mean ± SEM.</p

    Day and night Multi-Scale Glycemic Variability in older adults with and without type 2 DM As compared to controls, the type 2 DM group had greater variability during the day in GVC<sub>2–5</sub>, and night GVC<sub>3–5</sub>.

    No full text
    <p>At night, glycemic variability declined in type 2 DM in GVC<sub>2–4</sub> and in controls in GVC<sub>3</sub>. ‘*’ (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and ‘‡’ (<i>P</i><0.0001) indicate significant differences between diabetics/day and controls/day; ‘∥∥’ (<i>P</i><0.0001) indicates significant differences between diabetics/night and controls/night; ‘†’ (<i>P</i> = 0.003) and ‘§’ (<i>P</i><0.0001) indicates significant differences between diabetics/day and diabetics/night; ‘¶’ (<i>P</i> = 0.028) indicates significant difference between control/day and control/night. All the <i>P</i> values were obtained by ANOVA. Results are presented as mean ± SEM.</p

    Examples of least squares models indicating negative relationships between Multi-Scale GV and regional GM volumes as well as cognitive performance.

    No full text
    <p>(A) relationship between GVC<sub>2</sub> and GM volume in the left insular cortex; (B) relationship between GVC<sub>1</sub> and GM volume in the right fusiform gyrus; (C) relationship between GVC<sub>2</sub> and GM volume in the left cingulate gyrus; (D) relationship between GVC<sub>2</sub> and overall cognitive performance (composite T score) (diabetics: triangles; controls: circles). We presented <i>r<sup>2</sup></i> for the entire model adjusted for age and sex and group, and <i>P</i> values for the specific effect of Multi-scale GV.</p

    Characteristics of the study cohort.

    No full text
    <p>Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). P values were obtained by One-Way ANOVA to compare group means and using Wilcoxon Test for not normally distributed variables. The variables analyzed using Wilcoxon Test are Age, Sex, Race, Education, Hypertension, Microalbumin (urine), Cholesterol-to-HDL ratio, Triglycerides, Total number of Hypoglycemic Events, Average duration of Hypoglycemic Events, and Hematocrit, and other variables were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA. MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination.</p

    Complexity-based and Traditional measures of sway for the Randomized to Tai-Chi and Randomized to usual care groups across visits.

    No full text
    a<p>values provided are mean ± standard deviation. <sup>b</sup>values are estimated slope (lower 95% confidence interval, upper 95% confidence interval). <sup>c</sup>p-values for testing for an effect of age indicated by p-age. <sup>d</sup>p-values for comparing mean rates of change among Tai-Chi vs. usual care groups indicated by p-group*time.</p><p>Complexity-based and Traditional measures of sway for the Randomized to Tai-Chi and Randomized to usual care groups across visits.</p
    corecore