3 research outputs found
Zooarchaeological investigation of the Hoabinhian exploitation of reptiles and amphibians in Thailand and Cambodia with a focus on the Yellow-Headed tortoise ( Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854))
International audienceAbstract Although non-marine turtles are nearly ubiquitous in the Southeast Asian archaeological record, their zooarchaeological study has been very poorly undertaken in that tropical region of the world. This lack of study makes the understanding of past human subsistence strategies very complex especially regarding the prehistoric hunter gatherer populations which may have massively exploited inland chelonian taxa. In order to try to start a new dynamic regarding the study of the past human-turtle interactions in Southeast Asia we propose here an in-depth zooarchaeological analysis of the turtle bone remains recovered from four Hoabinhian Hunter-gatherer archaeological assemblages located in Thailand and Cambodia, and dated from the Late Pleistocene to the first half of the Holocene. Our study is focused on the bone remains attributed to the Yellow-Headed Tortoise (Indotestudo elongata) as they account for the majority of the turtle archaeological assemblages identified in the target area. For this species, we developed osteo-metric equations enabling the estimation of the carapace size of the archaeological individuals of this species. This allowed us to study the size structure of the archaeological populations in the different sites and to reveal the human exploitation strategies of these animals. We found a strong taphonomic homogeneity between the studied assemblages suggesting similarities of the subsistence behaviors in the different sites despite their very different environmental settings. We thus hypothesize putative cultural similarities across time and space. In addition, we also provide a baseline for future zooarchaeological studies as well as a methodological frame for the detailed studies of archaeological turtle bones in continental Southeast Asia
Zooarchaeological investigation of the Hoabinhian exploitation of reptiles and amphibians in Thailand and Cambodia with a focus on the Yellow-headed Tortoise (Indotestudo elongata (Blyth, 1854))
International audienceWhile non-marine turtles are almost ubiquitous in the archaeological record of Southeast Asia, their zooarchaeological examination has been inadequately pursued within this tropical region. This gap in research hinders a complete comprehension of past human subsistence strategies and economies, as only a limited number of comprehensive studies encompassing all the taxa found in archaeological sites have been conducted thus far. This constraint becomes particularly significant in relation to prehistoric hunter-gatherer populations, who might have extensively utilized inland chelonian taxa. In order to initiate a new approach to the study of past human-turtle interactions in Southeast Asia, we propose an in-depth zooarchaeological analysis of turtle bone remains recovered from four Hoabinhian Hunter-gatherer archaeological assemblages located in Thailand and Cambodia, dating from the Late Pleistocene to the first half of the Holocene. Our study focuses on the bone remains attributed to the Yellow-headed Tortoise (Indotestudo elongata) as it is the most represented taxon in archaeological assemblages in the region of study. For this species, we developed osteometric equations enabling the estimation of the carapace size of the archaeological individuals. This allowed us to study the size structure of the archaeological populations at different sites and to reveal the human exploitation strategies of these animals. We observed a significant taphonomic homogeneity among the studied assemblages, along with similarities in the diversity of hunted reptile and amphibian taxa as well as the size of the exploited tortoises. These findings suggest consistent subsistence behaviors across distinct sites, despite their varying environmental conditions, and raise the possibility of cultural similarities across different periods and regions. Additionally, we provide a baseline for future zooarchaeological studies and a methodological framework for the detailed analysis of archaeological turtle bones in continental Southeast Asia.āļāļķāļāđāļĄ&āļ§(āļēāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāđāļāļīāļāļāļēāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļāļĢāļīāđāļ§āļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļ°āļ§āļąāļāļāļāļāđāļāļĩ āļĒāļāđāļ& āļāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļāļāđāļ(āļēāļāļąāđāļāđāļ(āļēāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āđāļ(āļēāļāđāđāļēāļāļĒ(āļēāļāđāļāļĢ(āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒ āđāļ(āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ§āļīāļāļąāļĒāļāļēāļĄāļāļĢāļ°āļāļ§āļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļŠāļąāļāļ§āļ§āļīāļĒāļēāļāļĨāļąāļāļĒāļąāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĒāļđ(āļāļĒ(āļēāļāļāđāļēāļāļą āļāđāļāļ āļđāļĄāļīāļ āļēāļāđāļāļāļĢ&āļāļāļāļĩāđ āļāļķāļāđāļNāļāļŠāļēāđāļŦāļāļļāļāđāļēāđāļŦ&āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđ&āđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļ&āļēāđāļ āđāļāļĢāļđāļāđāļāļāđāļĻāļĢāļāļāļīāļ āļŠāļąāļāļāļĄ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāļĢāļāļāļĩāļāļāļāļāļĄāļāļļāļĐāļĒQāđāļāļāļāļĩāļāļĒāļą āļāļāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļĄāļāļđ āļĢāļQāđāļĨāļ°āļāļĢāļāļ&āļ§āļ āļ&āļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļāļļāļāļĩāđ āđāļāļ·āđāļāļŠāļĢ&āļēāļāđāļāļ§āļāļēāļāđāļŦāļĄ(āļ(āļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļāļāļīāļŠāļąāļĄāļāļąāļāļQāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§(āļēāļāļĄāļāļļāļĐāļĒQāđāļĨāļ°āđāļ(āļēāđāļāđāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļ°āļ§āļąāļāļāļāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļ& āļāļķāļāļāđāļēāđāļŦ&āļāļđ&āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļāđāļēāļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļŠāļąāļāļ§Q āļ§āļīāļāļĒāļēāļĄāļēāđāļ&āđāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļīāļāļĨāļķāļāļ(āļēāļ āļāļĢāļ°āļāļđāļāđāļ(āļēāļāļĩāđāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļŦāļĨ(āļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļāļĩāđāļāļĒāļđ(āđāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļ°āđāļāļĻāđāļāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļąāļĄāļāļđāļāļēāļāđāļēāļāļ§āļ 4 āđāļŦ(āļ āļāļĩāđāļĄāļāļļāļĐāļĒQāļāđāļēāļĢāļāļāļĩāļāļ&āļ§āļĒāļāļēāļĢāļŦāļēāļāļāļāļWāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļĨ(āļēāļŠāļąāļāļ§Q āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĒāļļāļāļĒāļđ( āđāļāļ(āļ§āļāļŠāļĄāļąāļĒāđāļāļĨāļŠāđāļāļāļĩāļāļāļāļāļĨāļēāļĒāļāļķāļāđāļŪāđāļĨāļāļĩāļāļāļāļāļ&āļ āđāļāļĒāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļāļĢāļąāđāļāļāļĩāđāđāļ&āļāđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļ°āļāļđāļāđāļ(āļēāļāļĢāļ°āđāļ āļāđāļ(āļēāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāļ (Indotestudo elongata) āđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļNāļāļŠāļąāļāļ§QāļāļĩāđāļāļāļĄāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļļāļāđāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāđāļŦāļĨ(āļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļāļĩāđāđāļĨāļ·āļāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļē āļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļāļĢāļąāđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļđ&āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļ&āļāđāļēāļ§āļī āļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļąāļāļāļāļēāļāļŠ(āļ§āļāļ(āļēāļ āđ āļāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļđāļ (Osteometry) āļāļķāđāļāļāđāļēāđāļŦ&āļāļĢāļēāļāļāļķāļāļāļāļēāļāđāļāļĢāļāļŠāļĢ&āļēāļāļāļāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļĢāļāļēāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļāļĩāđāļāļāđāļāđāļ(āļĨāļ°āļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđ āļāļĩāļāļāļąāđāļāļĒāļą āļāļāđāļēāđāļŦ&āļāļĢāļēāļāļĢāļđāļāđāļāļāļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļĨ(āļēāļŠāļąāļāļ§Qāļāļāļ āļĄāļāļļāļĐāļĒQāđāļāļāļāļĩāļāļāļĩāļāļ&āļ§āļĒ āļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđ āļāļđ&āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļĒāļąāļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļŠāļąāļāļ§QāđāļĨāļ·āđāļāļĒāļāļĨāļēāļāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļāļ§QāļŠāļ°āđāļāļīāļāļāđāđāļēāļŠāļ°āđāļāļīāļāļāļāļāļ§āļāļāļđ(āđāļāļāļąāļāđāļ(āļē āļāļĨāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļĒāđāļ&āļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļąāļ āļāļāļēāļ āļāļāļ§(āļēāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļāđāļ(āļēāļāļĩāđāļāļđāļāļĨ(āļēāļŠāļ°āļ&āļāļāđāļŦ&āđāļŦāđāļāļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļāļāļāļāļāļ āđāļĄ&āļ§( āļēāļāļ°āļāļĒāļđ(āļāļēāļĻāļąāļĒāđāļāļāļĢāļīāđāļ§āļāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļŠāļ āļēāļāđāļ§āļāļĨ&āļāļĄāļāļĩāđāđāļāļāļ(āļēāļāļāļąāļ āļāļĩāļāļāļąāđāļāļĒāļą āļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄ āļāļĨ&āļēāļĒāļāļĨāļķāļāļāļąāļāļāļāļāļ§āļą āļāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļĄ&āļ§(āļēāļāļ°āļāļĒāļđ(āđāļāļ(āļ§āļāđāļ§āļĨāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ āļđāļĄāļīāļ āļēāļāļāļĩāđāļ(āļēāļāļāļąāļ āļāļĒ(āļēāļāđāļĢāļāđāļāļēāļĄ āļāļđ&āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļ&āļ§āļēāļāđāļāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāļ&āļēāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļāļāļāļĩāļŠāļąāļāļ§āļ§āļīāļĒāļēāļ(āļēāļ āļāļĢāļ°āļāļđāļāđāļ(āļēāđāļāļĒāļĨāļ°āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļ āđāļāļĒāđāļ&āļāļĻāļķāļāļĐāļēāđāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļ§āļĩāļāđāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāļ°āļ§āļąāļāļāļāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļ&āđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļŦ&āļ&āļāļĄāļđāļĨāļāļĢāļāļ&āļ§āļāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļĄāļāļđāļĢāļQāļĄāļēāļāļĒāļīāđāļāļāļķāđ