8 research outputs found
The importation and establishment of community transmission of SARSCoV- 2 during the first eight weeks of the South African COVID-19 epidemic
BACKGROUND : We describe the epidemiology of COVID-19 in South Africa following importation and during
implementation of stringent lockdown measures.
METHODS : Using national surveillance data including demographics, laboratory test data, clinical presentation,
risk exposures (travel history, contacts and occupation) and outcomes of persons undergoing COVID-19 testing
or hospitalised with COVID-19 at sentinel surveillance sites, we generated and interpreted descriptive
statistics, epidemic curves, and initial reproductive numbers (Rt).
FINDINGS : From 4 March to 30 April 2020, 271,670 SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests were performed (462 tests/100,000
persons). Of these, 7,892 (2.9%) persons tested positive (median age 37 years (interquartile range 28 49
years), 4,568 (58%) male, cumulative incidence of 13.4 cases/100,000 persons). Hospitalization records were
found for 1,271 patients (692 females (54%)) of whom 186 (14.6%) died. Amongst 2,819 cases with data, 489/
2819 (17.3%) travelled internationally within 14 days prior to diagnosis, mostly during March 2020 (466
(95%)). Cases diagnosed in April compared with March were younger (median age, 37 vs. 40 years), less likely
female (38% vs. 53%) and resident in a more populous province (98% vs. 91%). The national initial Rt was 2.08
(95% confidence interval (CI): 1.71 2.51).
INTERPRETATION : The first eight weeks following COVID-19 importation were characterised by early predominance
of imported cases and relatively low mortality and transmission rates. Despite stringent lockdown
measures, the second month following importation was characterised by community transmission and
increasing disease burden in more populous provinces.The South African governmenthttps://www.journals.elsevier.com/eclinicalmedicineam2022School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH
Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection and SARS-CoV-2 positive hospital admissions among children in South Africa
INTRODUCTION : We describe epidemiology and outcomes of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and positive admissions among children <18 years in South Africa, an upper-middle income setting with high inequality.
METHODS : Laboratory and hospital COVID-19 surveillance data, 28 January - 19 September 2020 was used. Testing rates were calculated as number of tested for SARS-CoV-2 divided by population at risk; test positivity rates were calculated as positive tests divided by total number of tests. In-hospital case fatality ratio (CFR) was calculated based on hospitalized positive admissions with outcome data who died in-hospital and whose death was judged SARS-CoV-2 related by attending physician.
FINDINGS : 315 570 children aged <18 years were tested for SARS-CoV-2; representing 8.9% of all 3 548 738 tests and 1.6% of all children in the country. Of children tested, 46 137 (14.6%) were positive. Children made up 2.9% (n = 2007) of all SARS-CoV-2 positive admissions to sentinel hospitals. Among children, 47 died (2.6% case-fatality). In-hospital deaths were associated with male sex [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.18 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.08–4.40)] vs female; age <1 year [aOR 4.11 (95% CI 1.08–15.54)], age 10–14 years [aOR 4.20 (95% CI1.07–16.44)], age 15–17 years [aOR 4.86 (95% 1.28–18.51)] vs age 1–4 years; admission to a public hospital [aOR 5.07(95% 2.01–12.76)] vs private hospital and ≥1 underlying conditions [aOR 12.09 (95% CI 4.19–34.89)] vs none.
CONCLUSIONS : Children with underlying conditions were at greater risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 outcomes. Children > 10 years, those in certain provinces and those with underlying conditions should be considered for increased testing and vaccination.SUPPORTING INFORMATION : TABLE S1: Description of SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR positive children <18 years in South Africa, 1 March 2020–19 September 2020 (N = 45 609).
TABLE S2: Description of SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR positive hospital admissions among children <18 years in South Africa by province, 1 March 2020–19 September 2020 (N = 2007).
TABLE S3: Distribution of non-missing variables among children with complete follow up and included in multivariable model (N = 1817).
TABLE S4: Factors associated with in-hospital death among SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR positive admissions in children <18 years, South Africa, 1 March 2020–19 September 2020. FIGURE S1: Number of SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR tests*, percent positive tests and associated- hospital admissions among children <18 years by province and epidemiology week, South Africa, 1 March 2020–19 September 2020.National Department of Health, Republic of South Africahttp://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/irvhj2022School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH
Legislative Documents
Also, variously referred to as: House bills; House documents; House legislative documents; legislative documents; General Court documents
Knowledge, attitudes and practices on malaria transmission in Mamfene, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa 2015
Abstract Background In South Africa malaria is endemic in Mpumalanga, Limpopo and the north–eastern areas of KwaZulu-Natal provinces. South Africa has set targets to eliminate malaria by 2018 and research into complementary vector control tools such as the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) is ongoing. It is important to understand community perceptions regarding malaria transmission and control interventions to enable development of community awareness campaign messages appropriate to the needs of the community. We aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding malaria transmission to inform a public awareness campaign for SIT in Jozini Local Municipality, Mamfene in KwaZulu-Natal province. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in three communities in Mamfene, KwaZulu-Natal during 2015. A structured field piloted questionnaire was administered to 400 randomly selected heads of households. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Results Of the 400 participants interviewed, 99% had heard about malaria and correctly associated it with mosquito bites. The sources of malaria information were the local health facility (53%), radio (16%) and community meetings (7%). Approximately 63% of the participants were able to identify three or four symptoms of malaria. The majority (76%) were confident that indoor residual spraying (IRS) kills mosquitoes and prevents infection. Bed nets were used by 2% of the participants. SIT knowledge was poor (9%), however 63% of the participants were supportive of mosquito releases for research purposes. The remaining 37% raised concerns and fears, including fear of the unknown and lack of information on the SIT. Conclusion Appropriate knowledge, positive attitude and acceptable treatment-seeking behaviour for malaria were demonstrated by members of the community. Community involvement will be crucial in achieving success of the SIT and future studies should further investigate concerns raised by the community. The existing communication channels used by the malaria control program can be used; however additional channels should be investigated
Prevalence of TB among the study participants, July—September 2016, South Africa.
<p>Prevalence of TB among the study participants, July—September 2016, South Africa.</p
Characteristics of the study participants, July—September 2016, South Africa.
<p>Characteristics of the study participants, July—September 2016, South Africa.</p
Preferred method of response to the survey among study participants, July—September 2016, South Africa (N = 459).
<p>Preferred method of response to the survey among study participants, July—September 2016, South Africa (N = 459).</p
Knowledge, attitudes and practices on malaria transmission in Mamfene, KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa 2015
Abstract Background In South Africa malaria is endemic in Mpumalanga, Limpopo and the north–eastern areas of KwaZulu-Natal provinces. South Africa has set targets to eliminate malaria by 2018 and research into complementary vector control tools such as the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) is ongoing. It is important to understand community perceptions regarding malaria transmission and control interventions to enable development of community awareness campaign messages appropriate to the needs of the community. We aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding malaria transmission to inform a public awareness campaign for SIT in Jozini Local Municipality, Mamfene in KwaZulu-Natal province. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey in three communities in Mamfene, KwaZulu-Natal during 2015. A structured field piloted questionnaire was administered to 400 randomly selected heads of households. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize data. Results Of the 400 participants interviewed, 99% had heard about malaria and correctly associated it with mosquito bites. The sources of malaria information were the local health facility (53%), radio (16%) and community meetings (7%). Approximately 63% of the participants were able to identify three or four symptoms of malaria. The majority (76%) were confident that indoor residual spraying (IRS) kills mosquitoes and prevents infection. Bed nets were used by 2% of the participants. SIT knowledge was poor (9%), however 63% of the participants were supportive of mosquito releases for research purposes. The remaining 37% raised concerns and fears, including fear of the unknown and lack of information on the SIT. Conclusion Appropriate knowledge, positive attitude and acceptable treatment-seeking behaviour for malaria were demonstrated by members of the community. Community involvement will be crucial in achieving success of the SIT and future studies should further investigate concerns raised by the community. The existing communication channels used by the malaria control program can be used; however additional channels should be investigated