Dosimetric evaluation in breast tumours: comparison of three techniques

Purpose – To compare the conventional technique, the technique of mixed energies and the technique field-in-field with mixed energies, checking the received dose in organs at risk and target volume. Methods – Fifteen patients with carcinoma of the left breast classified as T1-T3N0M0 were treated with breast-conserving surgery, followed by postoperative radiotherapy. For each patient were carried out three dosimetric plannings, each one of them concerns the different techniques under study. Through the DVH generated to evaluate Dmax, Dmed, Dmin, D95%, D3% and the homogeneity of the target volume dose, well as the dose in organs at risk. We used the Friedman test to assess the significance of the study, with a confidence interval of 95%. Results – For the left lung and heart were obtained with the technique field-in-field with mixed energies, lower doses compared with the other two techniques. For the Dmax and the homogeneity of the PTV dose, the technique field-in-field with mixed energies was more effective compared to other techniques. However, there was a better coverage of the PTV dose with conventional technique. Conclusions – The technique field-in-field with mixed energy allows a reduction in dose for organs at risk, a significant reduction Dmax in PTV and improves the homogeneity of the dose compared with other techniques. The results obtained with the technique field-in-field with mixed energy indicate to reduce the side effects caused by the treatment