Anatomic location and mortality of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single institution study

In pancreatic adenocarcinoma, it is believed that patients with proximal tumors (head) have earlier diagnosis and higher survival due to anatomic location compared to patients with distal tumors (body/tail). We hypothesized that differences in tumor biology would contribute to poorer survival in body/tail tumors compared to head tumors when diagnosed at the same stage. We performed a retrospective chart review on 324 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (236 head and 88 body/tail) diagnosed from 2011-2017. We gathered electronic health records from a single center with a high volume of pancreatic cancer directed surgery. We compared median patient survival from onset of diagnosis based on cancer staging and tumor location. The overall body/tail cancer survival was significantly less than pancreatic head cancer (11.2 months body/tail compared to 16 months head, p=0.015). When broken down individually by stage at diagnosis or surgery, the survival for body/tail cases was not statistically significant to pancreatic head cases (p\u3e0.05). After adjusting for both stage and surgery, the hazard ratio of body/tail reduced from 1.42 to 0.96. The overall survival of pancreatic head cancer was significantly higher than that of the body/tail cancer, which was attributed to the head group being diagnosed earlier and/or underwent surgery. The head group’s survival advantage diminishes when corrected by stage and surgery and has a similar survival to the body/tail cancer. This result less likely supports a difference in tumor biology on survival

Metabolic Pathways and Targets in Chondrosarcoma

Chondrosarcomas are the second most common primary bone malignancy. Chondrosarcomas are characterized by the production of cartilaginous matrix and are generally resistant to radiation and chemotherapy and the outcomes are overall poor. Hence, there is strong interest in determining mechanisms of cancer aggressiveness and therapeutic resistance in chondrosarcomas. There are metabolic alterations in chondrosarcoma that are linked to the epigenetic state and tumor microenvironment that drive treatment resistance. This review focuses on metabolic changes in chondrosarcoma, and the relationship between signaling via isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2), hedgehog, PI3K-mTOR-AKT, and SRC, as well as histone acetylation and angiogenesis. Also, potential treatment strategies targeting metabolism will be discussed including potential synergy with immunotherapies

A Rare Metastatic Mesenteric Malignant PEComa with TSC2 Mutation Treated with Palliative Surgical Resection and Nab-Sirolimus: A Case Report

BACKGROUND: Malignant perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are exceedingly rare malignant mesenchymal neoplasms with characteristic morphological and immunohistochemical (IHC) patterns. However, some malignant PEComas are poorly differentiated with atypical histopathological features, making a definitive diagnosis difficult. PEComas are most commonly found in females and often show either TSC1 or TSC2 alterations, which result in the activation of the mTOR pathway, or TFE3 fusions. Given these molecular characteristics, mTOR inhibitors have recently been approved by the FDA in the treatment of malignant PEComas, particularly in those with TSC1/2 alterations. Therefore, molecular analyses may be helpful for both the diagnostic workup of and predicting response to mTOR inhibitors in cases of malignant PEComas. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a case of an aggressive, 23 cm mesenteric malignant PEComa with multiple peritoneal metastases in a young male patient. Pathological examination of the initial biopsy showed a malignant epithelioid neoplasm with high-grade morphology and atypical immunoprofile, which precluded a definitive diagnosis. Because of the patient\u27s excessive transfusion requirements due to intra-tumoral hemorrhage, a palliative R2 resection was performed. Histopathological examination of the tumor revealed focal immunoreactivity for Melan-A, HMB-45, desmin, and CD117. Although a diagnosis of malignant PEComa was favored, other entities such as epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) or melanoma could not be definitively ruled out. Given the favored diagnosis, the patient was started on sirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, rather than chemotherapy. Molecular analyses were performed and the tumor was found to harbor mutations in TP53 and TSC2, supporting a definitive diagnosis of malignant PEComa. The patient was then switched to nab-sirolimus, with initial stabilization of the disease. CONCLUSIONS: This report details a multidisciplinary approach for the diagnosis and management of a highly aggressive, metastatic malignant PEComa in a young male patient. The basis for the treatment of malignant PEComas with the recently FDA-approved mTOR inhibitor, nab-sirolimus, is also reviewed. In summary, this case highlights the importance of molecular analysis, particularly TSC1/2 alterations, for both the definitive diagnosis of malignant PEComas and predicting their response to nab-sirolimus

The Effects of Physical Activity on Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Scoping Review

Background: Cancer therapies are associated with multiple adverse effects, including (but not limited to) cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Fatigue is one of the most common side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), occurring in up to 25% of patients. Physical activity has been shown to help reduce CRF through modulating the immune system, and may synergistically aid in the anti-tumor effects of ICIs. This review describes the nature and scope of evidence for the effects associated with concurrent physical activity while undergoing ICI therapy. Method: Scoping review methodology was utilized to identify studies, extract data, and collate and summarize results. Results: In literature published from January 2010 through to August 2021, only one human study and three pre-clinical studies met inclusion criteria. Conclusion: Existing evidence supports that physical activity is associated with decreased treatment-related toxicities such as CRF. However, further investigation is warranted. The dearth of clinical studies illustrates the need for more research to address this question, to guide patients and their providers in the application of appropriate physical activity interventions in those patients undergoing ICI

The Effects of Physical Activity on Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Cancer therapies are associated with multiple adverse effects, including (but not limited to) cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Fatigue is one of the most common side effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), occurring in up to 25% of patients. Physical activity has been shown to help reduce CRF through modulating the immune system, and may synergistically aid in the anti-tumor effects of ICIs. This review describes the nature and scope of evidence for the effects associated with concurrent physical activity while undergoing ICI therapy. METHOD: Scoping review methodology was utilized to identify studies, extract data, and collate and summarize results. RESULTS: In literature published from January 2010 through to August 2021, only one human study and three pre-clinical studies met inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: Existing evidence supports that physical activity is associated with decreased treatment-related toxicities such as CRF. However, further investigation is warranted. The dearth of clinical studies illustrates the need for more research to address this question, to guide patients and their providers in the application of appropriate physical activity interventions in those patients undergoing ICI

Trial in Progress: Sonoporation for Disrupting the Pancreatic Cancer Microenvironment to Enhance Chemotherapy Delivery and Improve Outcomes

Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is 3% of cancers diagnosed in the United States with 62,210 new cases expected in 2022, but it is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Hence, there is a considerable clinical need to develop innovative strategies for effective drug delivery and treatment monitoring, resulting in improved outcomes for patients with PDAC. Sonoporation is a novel method that can enhance the therapeutic efficacy of co-administered chemotherapy by localized contrastenhanced ultrasound imaging (CEUS) of gas-filled microbubbles (ultrasound contrast agent UCA), which temporarily changes the tumor vascular microenvironment by increasing leakage from angiogenic vessels through microstreaming, shockwaves and the activation of various intracellular signaling responses [1]. Our Phase I clinical trial of sonoporation in 10 PDAC patients treated with Gemcitabine demonstrated no additional toxicity and an increase in median survival compared to the standard of care treatment (8.9 vs 17.6 months; p = 0.011) [2]. Subsequent, animal studies investigated 4 commercial UCAs under 2 different acoustic regimes and established the optimal UCA (Sonazoid; GE Healthcare, Oslo, Norway) as well as acoustic settings for sonoporation of PDAC [3]. There are two major chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of non-resectable PDAC, a combination of Leucovorin, Fluorouracil, Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), considered the first line treatment, or a combination of Gemcitabine with a nanoparticle formulation of Paclitaxel (Nab-Paclitaxel), the second line treatment. These regiments results in a median overall survival of approximately 11 and 8-9 months. The Oncological departments at Jefferson and Haukeland will be responsible for the SoC chemotherapeutic treatment. We will use the hospital’s standard recommended treatment protocols of gemcitabine hydrochloride (Gemkabi®) combined with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (Nab-Paclitaxel (Abraxane®)), and FOLFIRINOX.https://jdc.jefferson.edu/medoncposters/1013/thumbnail.jp

Effect of a MUC5AC Antibody (NPC-1C) Administered With Second-Line Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel on the Survival of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance: Treatment options are limited for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) beyond first-line 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX), with such individuals commonly being treated with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Objective: To determine whether NPC-1C, an antibody directed against MUC5AC, might increase the efficacy of second-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced PDAC. Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial enrolled patients with advanced PDAC between April 2014 and March 2017 whose disease had progressed on first-line FOLFIRINOX. Eligible patients had tumors with at least 20 MUC5AC staining by centralized immunohistochemistry review. Statistical analysis was performed from April to May 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2) administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle, with or without intravenous NPC-1C 1.5 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Pretreatment clinical variables were explored with Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: A total of 78 patients (median [range] age, 62 [36-78] years; 32 [41%] women; 9 [12%] Black; 66 [85%] White) received second-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (n = 40) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and NPC-1C (n = 38). Median OS was 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.7-8.4 months) with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.5 months; P = .22) with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and NPC-1C. Median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.9-4.1 months) with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs 3.4 months (95% CI, 1.9-5.3 months; P = .80) with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and NPC-1C. The ORR was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.4%-19.7%) in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and NPC-1C group and 2.9% (95% CI, 0.4%-18.7%) in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. No differences in toxicity were observed between groups, except that grade 3 or greater anemia occurred more frequently in patients treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel and NPC-1C than gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (39% [15 of 38] vs 10% [4 of 40]; P = .003). The frequency of chemotherapy dose reductions was similar in both groups (65% vs 74%; P = .47). Lower performance status, hypoalbuminemia, PDAC diagnosis less than or equal to 18 months before trial enrollment, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio less than 2.8, and CA19-9 greater than 2000 IU/mL were independently associated with poorer survival. Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of advanced PDAC, NPC-1C did not enhance the efficacy of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. These data provide a benchmark for future trials investigating second-line treatment of PDAC. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01834235

Identification of dual STRN-NTRK2 rearrangements in a high grade sarcoma, with good clinical response to first-line larotrectinib therapy

Abstract Background Among the three NTRK genes, NTRK2 possesses a tremendous structural complexity and involves tumorigenesis of several types of tumors. To date, only STRN and RBPMS are identified in the fusion with NTRK2 in adult soft tissue tumors. More recently, the highly selective Trk tyrosine kinases inhibitors, including larotrectinib and entrectinib, have shown significant efficacy for treating tumors harboring NTRK fusions and were approved by FDA. Case presentation We report a case of sarcoma in a 35-year-old female harboring two STRN-NTRK2 gene fusions, with a good clinical response to first-line larotrectinib treatment. Core biopsy of the 16.5 cm gluteal mass showed a high-grade mesenchymal neoplasm with features reminiscent of a solitary fibrous tumor, but negative for STAT6. In-house next-generation sequencing gene fusion panel showed two in-frame STRN-NTRK2 fusions, which contain the same 5’ partner sequence (exon 1–3) of STRN, and the 3’ fusion partner starting from either the exon 15 or the exon 16 of NTRK2. Due to the large size and location of the tumor, first-line neoadjuvant therapy with larotrectinib was initiated. The patient has an excellent clinical response with an 83% tumor size reduction by imaging. The tumor was subsequently completely resected. After 130 days, larotrectinib was reinitiated for lung metastasis (up to 7 cm), and a complete resolution was achieved. When compared with NTRK1 and NTRK3, NTRK2 fusions are the least common. Of note, the only other report in the literature on NRTK2 fusion-positive sarcoma also showed solitary fibrous tumor (SFT)-like morphology, and the patient responded well to larotrectinib as the second line adjuvant therapy. Conclusions In conclusion, the identification of NTRK2 fusions in patients with soft tissue tumors could significantly improve the clinical outcome through selective NTRK inhibitor therapy, especially in the first-line setting. Prompt RNA-based NGS testing at initial diagnosis may benefit these patients. Our case is among the first few in the literature on NTRK2 fusion sarcoma with first-line larotrectinib therapy in the primary and metastatic setting, with good clinical response and minimal side effects

Understanding the role of sex on outcomes for the cancer patient undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a scoping review protocol

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape for multiple cancer types. Sex plays an important role in both the development of cancer as well as the functioning of the immune system. Though a difference in response to immune therapy is emerging between men and women it is unclear how this difference affects cancer outcomes and what the potential underlying mechanisms are for those effects. The objective of this study is to describe the influence that sex has on the outcomes experienced by cancer patients on ICI therapy and to identify and analyse any knowledge gaps in the field.Method and analysis The framework for this methodology was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The search and review will be conducted from January 2022 to June 2022. Two independent researchers will screen titles and abstracts followed by full-text screening for manuscript inclusion. Full length studies published between 2010 and December 2021 found in PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Scopus describing the influence of sex differences on cancer outcomes in patients treated with ICIs will be included. After data are extracted it will be summarised for presentation.Ethics and dissemination The findings of this scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results will be used to inform future studies on the potential differential impacts of ICIs. All data are from published openly accessible sources and therefore no ethical clearance is necessary