Nonbacterial and bacterial osteomyelitis in children: a case–control retrospective study

PurposeOsteomyelitis is a group of bone infectious (bacterial osteomyeilitis—BO) and noninfectious inflammatory diseases (nonbacterial osteomyelitis—NBO) with similar clinical, radiology, and laboratory features. Many patients with NBO are misdiagnosed as BO and receive unnecessary antibiotics and surgery. Our study aimed to compare clinical and laboratory features of NBO and BO in children, to define key discriminative criteria, and to create an NBO diagnostic score (NBODS).MethodsThe retrospective multicenter cohort study included clinical, laboratory, and instrumental information about histologically confirmed NBO (n = 91) and BO (n = 31). The variables allowed us to differentiate both conditions used to construct and validate the NBO DS.ResultsThe main differences between NBO and BO are as follows: onset age—7.3 (2.5; 10.6) vs. 10.5 (6.5; 12.7) years (p = 0.03), frequency of fever (34.1% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.0000001), symptomatic arthritis (67% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.0001), monofocal involvement (28.6% vs. 100%, p = 0.0000001), spine (32% vs. 6%, p = 0.004), femur (41% vs. 13%, p = 0.004), foot bones (40% vs. 13%, p = 0.005), clavicula (11% vs. 0%, p = 0.05), and sternum (11% vs. 0%, p = 0.039) involvement. The following four criteria are included in the NBO DS: CRP ≤ 55 mg/l (56 points), multifocal involvement (27 points), femur involvement (17 points), and neutrophil bands ≤ 220 cell/μl (15 points). The sum > 17 points allowed to differentiate NBO from BO with a sensitivity of 89.0% and a specificity of 96.9%.ConclusionThe diagnostic criteria may help discriminate NBO and BO and avoid excessive antibacterial treatment and surgery

Criteria for Differentiation of Non-Bacterial and Haematogenous Osteomyelitis: A Case-Control Study With Prospective Verification of the Outcomes

Background. Patients with haematogenous and non-bacterial osteomyelitis have similar clinical symptoms (pain in the nidus area, soft tissue swelling, fever) and laboratory signs (increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein concentration). The criteria for distinguishing these two states are not determined. Objective. Our aim was to determine diagnostic criteria to differentiate haematogenous and non-bacterial osteomyelitis. Methods. The study included data of patients under the age of 18 years with non-bacterial or haematogenous osteomyelitis hospitalised to two clinical centres from 2009 to 2016. The diagnosis was established and re-verified according to archival data (medical history) and after two years of observation (at least once a year). Clinical, anamnestic and laboratory data (haemoglobin, leukocytes, leukocyte formula, platelets, ESR and C-reactive protein, CRP) as well as the results of radiation diagnostics (X-ray, CT scan, MRI or osteosyntigraphy) obtained at the disease onset were taken into account as potential diagnostic criteria. Results. Out of 145 patients with non-bacterial or haematogenous osteomyelitis, the diagnosis was re-verified in 138, of them non-bacterial osteomyelitis — in 91, haematogenous osteomyelitis — in 47. The following criteria had the highest diagnostic value for establishing cases of non-bacterial osteomyelitis: detection of bone destruction foci surrounded by osteosclerosis area [sensitivity (Se) 1.0; specificity (Sp) 0.79]; absence of fever (Se 0.66; Sp 0.92); the number of bone destruction foci > 1 (Se 0.73; Sp 1.0); CRP 55 mg/L (Se 0.94; Sp 0.73); negative results of bacteriological examination of the material from the bone destruction focus (Se 1.0; Sp 0.67). Conclusion. Diagnostic criteria for differentiation of non-bacterial and haematogenous osteomyelitis have been described. Further research on the efficacy of using these criteria to reduce the risk of diagnostic errors, decrease the diagnostic pause, reduce the risk of non-bacterial osteomyelitis complications is needed

Proceedings Of The 23Rd Paediatric Rheumatology European Society Congress: Part Two

PubMe