27 research outputs found

    Measures and time points relevant for post-surgical follow-up in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pilot study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Rheumatic diseases commonly affect joints and other structures in the hand. Surgery is a traditional way to treat hand problems in inflammatory rheumatic diseases with the purposes of pain relief, restore function and prevent progression. There are numerous measures to choose from, and a combination of outcome measures is recommended. This study evaluated if instruments commonly used in rheumatologic clinical practice are suitable to measure outcome of hand surgery and to identify time points relevant for follow-up.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Thirty-one patients (median age 56 years, median disease duration 15 years) with inflammatory rheumatic disease and need for post-surgical occupational therapy intervention formed this pilot study group.</p> <p>Hand function was assessed regarding grip strength (Grippit), pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM) (Signals of Functional Impairment (SOFI)) and grip ability (Grip Ability Test (GAT)). Activities of daily life (ADL) were assessed by means of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome (DASH) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The instruments were evaluated by responsiveness and feasibility; follow-up points were 0, 3, 6 and 12 months.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points. Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points. The responsiveness of the instruments was stable between 6 and 12 month follow-up which imply that 6 month is an appropriate time for evaluating short-term effect of hand surgery in rheumatic diseases.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>We suggest a core set of instruments measuring pain, grip strength, grip ability, perceived symptoms and self-defined daily activities. This study has shown that VAS pain, the Grippit instrument, GAT, DASH symptom scale and COPM are suitable outcome instruments for hand surgery, while SOFI may be a more insensitive test. However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.</p

    First human face transplantation: 5 years outcomes

    No full text
    Background. The first human facial allotransplantation, a 38-year-old woman, was performed on November 27, 2005. The aesthetic aspect and functional recovery and the risk-to-benefit ratio are evaluated 5 years later. Materials and Methods. The facial transplantation included nose, chin, part of cheeks, and lips. The immunosuppressive protocol included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and antithymocyte globulins. In addition, donor bone marrow cells were infused on days 4 and 11 after transplantation. Results. The aesthetic aspect is satisfying. The patient has normal protective and discriminative sensibility. She showed a rapid motion recovery, which has remained stable for 3 years posttransplantation. She can smile, chew, swallow, and blow normally whereas pouting and kissing is still difficult. Phonation recovery was impressive therefore the patient can talk normally. Two episodes of acute rejection developed during the first year. Donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were never detected. Five-year mucosal biopsy showed a slight perivascular inflammatory infiltrate while skin biopsy was normal. The main side effect of the immunosuppressive treatment was a progressive decrease in renal function, which improved after switching from tacrolimus to sirolimus. Moreover, she developed arterial hypertension, an increase in lipid levels, and in situ cervix carcinoma treated by conization. Since 2008, she showed mild cholangitis possibly caused by sirolimus. In September 2010, bilateral pneumopathy occurred and was successfully treated with antibiotics. Conclusion. Despite some long-term complications, which are similar to those reported after solid organ transplantation, the patient is satisfied of her new face and has normal social interaction

    Clinical Heterogeneity of Immune Dysregulation, Polyendocrinopathy, Enteropathy, X-Linked Syndrome: A French Multicenter Retrospective Study

    No full text
    International audienceObjective: Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome is an autoimmune disease caused by mutations in the forkhead box protein 3 gene (FOXP3), which encodes a key regulator of immune tolerance. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical heterogeneity of the disease in a national French cohort. Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of patients diagnosed with IPEX syndrome caused by mutations in FOXP3. Results: Thirty children from 26 families were included. Age at disease onset (median [first to third quartile]) was 1.5 mo [0-84] and at death 3.5 years [0-10.5] (n = 15) indicating a high heterogeneity. Initial presentation was diarrhoea (68%), type 1 diabetes (T1D; 25%), skin lesions (7%) and nephropathy (3%). During the course of the disease the following main symptoms were observed: diarrhoea (100%), skin lesions (85%), T1DM (50%), severe food allergies (39%), haematological disorders (28%), nephropathies (25%), hepatitis (14%) as well as the presence of a variety of autoantibodies. Immunosuppressive mono- or combination therapy led to improvement in eight children. Three boys displayed a stable disease course without any immunosuppressive medication. Overall 10-year survival rate was 43% (42% in transplanted patients and 52% in patients on immunosuppressive therapy). Five out of 22 identified FOXP3 mutations have not been described yet: c.-23 + 1G \textgreater A, c.-23 + 5G \textgreater A, c.264delC, c.1015C \textgreater T and c.1091A \textgreater G. The first two produced atypical, attenuated phenotypes. Missense and frameshift mutations affecting the forkhead domain were associated with poor survival (Gehan-Wilcoxon p = 0.002). Conclusion: The broad phenotypic heterogeneity of IPEX raises questions about modifying factors and justifies early FOXP3 sequencing in suspected cases
    corecore