Geriatric Assessment in Multicultural Immigrant Populations

While the traditional comprehensive geriatric assessment provides valuable information essential to caring for older adults, it often falls short in multicultural immigrant populations. The number of foreign-born older adults is growing, and in some regions of the United States of America (U.S.), they encompass a significant portion of the older adult population. To ensure we are caring for this culturally diverse population adequately, we need to develop a more culturally competent comprehensive geriatric assessment. In this review, we explore ways in which to do this, address areas unique to multicultural immigrant populations, and identify limitations of the current assessment tools when applied to these populations. In order to be more culturally sensitive, we should incorporate the concepts of ethnogeriatrics into a comprehensive geriatric assessment, by addressing topics like healthcare disparities, language barriers, health literacy, acculturation level, and culturally defined beliefs. Additionally, we must be sensitive to the limitations of our current assessment tools and consider how we can expand our assessment toolkit to address these limitations. We discuss the limitations in cognitive screening tests, delirium assessments, functional and mental health assessments, advance care planning, and elder abuse

Systematic Review of Dementia Support Programs with Multicultural and Multilingual Populations

Dementia care programs have become more common due to a growing number of persons living with dementia and lack of substantial benefit from pharmacologic therapies. Cultural and language differences may present barriers to access and efficacy of these programs. In this article, we aimed to systematically review the current literature regarding outcomes of dementia care programs that included multicultural and non-English speaking populations. A systematic review was conducted using four scientific search engines. All studies included in the review are English language, randomized control trials evaluating various care coordination models. The initial search strategy focusing on studies specifically targeting multicultural and non-English speaking populations resulted in too few articles. We expanded our search to articles that included these populations although these populations may not have been the focus of the study. Seven articles met inclusion criteria for final review. Measured outcomes included emergency room use, hospitalizations, provider visits, quality of life indicators, depression scores, and caregiver burden. Dementia care programs demonstrate significant ability to provide support and improve outcomes for those living with dementia and their caregivers. There is limited research in this field and thus opportunity for further study in underserved and safety net populations including more high-quality randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes

A randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to decrease hospital length of stay by decreasing bedrest.

BACKGROUND:Approximately half of hospitalized patients suffer functional decline due to spending the vast majority of their time in bed. Previous studies of early mobilization have demonstrated improvement in outcomes, but the interventions studied have been resource-intensive. We aimed to decrease the time hospital inpatients spend in bed through a pragmatic mobilization protocol. METHODS:This prospective, non-blinded, controlled clinical trial assigned inpatients to the study wards per routine clinical care in an urban teaching hospital. All subjects on intervention wards were provided with a behavioral intervention, consisting of educational handouts, by the nursing staff. Half of the intervention wards were supplied with recliner chairs in which subjects could sit. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. The secondary outcome was the '6-Clicks' functional score. RESULTS:During a 6-month study period, 6082 patient encounters were included. The median length of stay was 84 hours (IQR 44-175 hours) in the control group, 80 hours (IQR 44-155 hours) in the group who received the behavioral intervention alone, and 88 hours (IQR 44-185 hours) in the group that received both the behavioral intervention and the recliner chair. In the multivariate analysis, neither the behavioral intervention nor the provision of a recliner chair was associated with a significant decrease in length of stay or increase in functional status as measured by the '6-Clicks' functional score. CONCLUSION:The program of educational handouts and provision of recliner chairs to discourage bed rest did not increase functional status or decrease length of stay for inpatients in a major urban academic center. Education and physical resources must be supplemented by other active interventions to reduce time spent in bed, functional decline, and length of stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, HS-16-00804

A randomized trial of a behavioral intervention to decrease hospital length of stay by decreasing bedrest.

BACKGROUND:Approximately half of hospitalized patients suffer functional decline due to spending the vast majority of their time in bed. Previous studies of early mobilization have demonstrated improvement in outcomes, but the interventions studied have been resource-intensive. We aimed to decrease the time hospital inpatients spend in bed through a pragmatic mobilization protocol. METHODS:This prospective, non-blinded, controlled clinical trial assigned inpatients to the study wards per routine clinical care in an urban teaching hospital. All subjects on intervention wards were provided with a behavioral intervention, consisting of educational handouts, by the nursing staff. Half of the intervention wards were supplied with recliner chairs in which subjects could sit. The primary outcome was hospital length of stay. The secondary outcome was the '6-Clicks' functional score. RESULTS:During a 6-month study period, 6082 patient encounters were included. The median length of stay was 84 hours (IQR 44-175 hours) in the control group, 80 hours (IQR 44-155 hours) in the group who received the behavioral intervention alone, and 88 hours (IQR 44-185 hours) in the group that received both the behavioral intervention and the recliner chair. In the multivariate analysis, neither the behavioral intervention nor the provision of a recliner chair was associated with a significant decrease in length of stay or increase in functional status as measured by the '6-Clicks' functional score. CONCLUSION:The program of educational handouts and provision of recliner chairs to discourage bed rest did not increase functional status or decrease length of stay for inpatients in a major urban academic center. Education and physical resources must be supplemented by other active interventions to reduce time spent in bed, functional decline, and length of stay. TRIAL REGISTRATION:ClinicalTrials.gov, HS-16-00804

The Care Ecosystem: The Effectiveness and Implementation of Telephone-Based Collaborative Dementia Care.

BACKGROUND: Health systems are increasingly interested in collaborative dementia care. Implementation challenges include the limited dementia specialist workforce, time pressures of high-volume care, increasing use of telemedicine, and inadequate reimbursement. The Care Ecosystem is a telephone-based collaborative dementia care model designed to augment existing healthcare services and be amenable to scale. Here we present the latest evidence for the Care Ecosystem, including the effects among subpopulations at risk for health disparities (rural and Hispanic/Latino), and facilitators from the early phase of Care Ecosystem implementation at 6 diverse health systems. METHOD: Effectiveness was evaluated in a single-blind, randomized clinical trial (N = 804). Persons with dementia (PWD)-caregiver dyads were randomized to receive 12 months of the intervention (N = 527) or usual care (N = 277). Outcomes were measured via telephone surveys at 6 and 12 months after randomization and medical record review. Subgroup analyses were performed for the 124 dyads who identified as Hispanic/Latino, and the 66 who lived in rural Nebraska or Iowa. The intervention was primarily delivered by an unlicensed, trained care team navigator, who provided education, support and care coordination with supervision and help from a dementia specialist team (advanced practice nurse, social worker, and pharmacist). Implementation facilitators were evaluated through observation and qualitative interviews with clinical teams at 6 health systems implementing the model. RESULTS: The PWD-caregiver dyads lived in California (n = 476), Nebraska (n = 286), or Iowa (n = 42). Compared with usual care, the Care Ecosystem improved PWD quality of life, reduced emergency department visits, reduced the use of potentially inappropriate medications, and decreased caregiver depression and caregiver burden. Effect sizes were similar or greater in Hispanic/Latino and rural subgroups on most outcomes. Facilitators of Care Ecosystem implementation included open-access implementation tools (online training, care protocols), the adaptability of the care model, the care team navigator role, and remote care delivery. CONCLUSION: Effective dementia care can be delivered by care team navigators via telephone to mitigate the burdens of dementia, including for underserved PWD living in rural areas or who identify as Hispanic/Latino. Implementation is a challenge although features of the care model appear to facilitate adoption