Modulating the gut microbiome to improve immune checkpoint inhibitor response to cancer: current therapies and emerging methods

Immunotherapy has emerged as one of the four “standard” cancer therapies, alongside surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is an immunotherapy that blocks inhibitory immune checkpoint interactions, allowing T cells and other immune cells to kill tumor cells. In the tumor microenvironment, there is often overexpression of immune checkpoint proteins, whose binding interaction with cytotoxic T cells and other immune cells results in the dampening of the antitumor response. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) are the two most targeted immune checkpoint proteins. Antibodies against PD-1 and CTLA-4, as well as other checkpoint proteins, are approved for clinical use as well as in clinical trials. While ICIs have changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, particularly those with significant immunogenicity, only 20-40% of patients respond to ICI therapy. Many factors are behind the lack of response and resistance, and significant efforts are aimed at improving the response to ICI therapy. One major area is modulating the gut microbiome, as it is well-established that microbial dysbiosis is associated with various human diseases. The concept is that by modulating the microbiome, we might be able to return it to a composition more similar to that seen in healthy individuals or provide microorganisms beneficial to clinical response. In the case of ICI therapy, it is proposed that there is a connection between certain microbial species and the immune system via metabolites and other signaling effects. The microbiome can be manipulated through many methods, including fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), transferring bacterial isolates or consortia, probiotics, antibiotics, and soluble dietary fiber. For clinical insights, it is important to consider how the pre-treatment microbiome of patients may affect their response to ICI therapy, as well as how their microbiomes can be manipulated to enhance their response. Initial clinical trials have been promising, but this is an emerging field with additional work to be done. Particularly, a better understanding of the microorganisms involved in the response to ICI therapy and the mechanism by which they communicate with the immune system is essential. Future studies will need to be much larger to reduce noise between studies and to allow for emerging computational techniques to be applied

Systemic and immunotoxicity induced by topical application of perfluoroheptane sulfonic acid (PFHpS) or perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in a murine model

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a large group of synthetic surfactants of over 12,000 compounds that are incorporated into numerous products for their chemical and physical properties. Studies have associated PFAS with adverse health effects. Although there is a high potential for dermal exposure, these studies are lacking. The present study evaluated the systemic and immunotoxicity of subchronic 28- or 10-days of dermal exposure, respectively, to PFHpS (0.3125–2.5% or 7.82–62.5 mg/kg/dose) or PFOS (0.5% or 12.5 mg/kg/dose) in a murine model. Elevated levels of PFHpS were detected in the serum and urine, suggesting that absorption is occurring through the dermal route. PFHpS induced significantly increased relative liver weight, significantly decreased relative spleen and thymus weight, altered serum chemistries, and altered histopathology. Additionally, PFHpS significantly reduced the humoral immune response and altered immune subsets in the spleen, suggesting immunosuppression. Gene expression changes were observed in the liver, skin, and spleen of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism, necrosis, and inflammation. Immune-cell phenotyping identified significant decreases in B-cells and CD11b+ monocyte and/or macrophages in the spleen along with decreases in eosinophils and dendritic cells in the skin. These findings support PFHpS absorption through the skin leading to liver damage and immune suppression