Serum levels of IL-10, IL-17F and IL-33 in patients with asthma: A case-control study

Objectives: The development of inflammation in asthma involves an intricate network of cytokines that recruit and activate numerous immune cells. This study was aimed to compare serum levels of IL-10, IL-17F, and IL-33 in asthmatic patients and non-asthmatic controls and correlate cytokine levels to asthma severity and various clinical, spirometric, and laboratory variables. Methods: Using ELISA, serum levels of IL-10, IL-17F, and IL-33 were evaluated in 44 asthmatics (14 mild persistent, 15 moderate persistent, and 15 severe persistent) and 44 controls. Results: This is one of the first reports showing a significant difference in serum levels of asthma-associated cytokines, anti-inflammatory IL-10, and pro-inflammatory IL-17F and IL-33, in the same subset of asthmatic patients. Our results showed diminished level of IL-10 and elevated levels of IL-17F and IL-33 in asthmatics than in controls (p\textless0.001). Assessment of cytokine levels between subjects of different gender, age group, and BMI showed non-significant differences. Correlation analysis of cytokine levels to clinical variables showed that IL-17F is associated negatively to FVC % predicted (forced vital capacity) and FEV1% predicted (forced expiratory volume in one second) and positively to number of allergens sensitized and FEV1 reversibility. A strong negative correlation was found between IL-10 and IL-33 levels (p=0.001). Conclusions: Negative correlation between IL-10 and IL-33 levels may reflect a converse relationship between anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines in an individually balanced pattern. The association between IL-17F level and asthmatic phenotypes such as reduced FVC and FEV1, higher degree of sensitization, and post-bronchodilator reversibility needs further assessments

Providing Diabetes Education through Phone Calls Assisted in the Better Control of Hyperglycemia and Improved the Knowledge of Patients on Diabetes Management

Purpose: A recent single-arm pilot study from our group showed a significant decrease in HbA1C in Type-2 diabetes individuals provided with SMS and phone call-based education on glycemic control. Considering the preference of participants to phone call-based education, a randomized control trial (RCT) with parallel design was conducted to determine the impact of phone call-based diabetes educational intervention on the control of hyperglycemia and improvement in the knowledge about diabetes management. Objectives: To determine the impact of phone call-based educational intervention on the control of hyperglycemia and improvement in the knowledge about diabetes management. Methodology: The study was conducted for a period of 12 months on a total of 273 Type-2 diabetic patients (interventional group (n = 135); non-interventional group (n = 138)) who had provided consent to participate. Subjects in the case group received weekly phone calls on diabetes education; whereas the control group received no education. HbA1C investigations were carried out at baseline and at every fourth month until the completion of the study period for the subjects in both the groups. The impact of phone call-based education was measured by comparing HbA1C values as well as by measuring the questionnaire-based knowledge scores on diabetes management. Results: At the end of the study period, there was a significant reduction in HbA1C in 58.8% participants (n = 65) and a manifold (2–5-fold) increase in knowledge on diabetes management among participants in the case group (n = 110). However, no significant difference in HbA1C and knowledge score was observed in participants from the control group (n = 115). Conclusion: Phone call-based diabetes education is a viable option to empower patients for better management of Type-2 diabetes