15 research outputs found

    Quality of anticoagulation and use of warfarin-interacting medications in long-term care: A chart review

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Maintenance of therapeutic International Normalized Ratio (INR) in the community is generally poor. The supervised environment in long-term care facilities may represent a more ideal setting for warfarin therapy since laboratory monitoring, compliance, dose adjustment, and interacting medications can all be monitored and controlled. The objectives of this study were to determine how effectively warfarin was administered to a cohort of residents in long-term care facilities, to identify the proportion of residents prescribed warfarin-interacting drugs and to ascertain factors associated with poor INR control.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A chart review of 105 residents receiving warfarin therapy in five long-term care facilities in Hamilton, Ontario was performed. Data were collected on INR levels, warfarin prescribing and monitoring practices, and use of interacting medications.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Over a 12 month period (28,555 resident-days, 78.2 resident years) 3065 INR values were available. Residents were within, below and above the therapeutic range 54%, 35% and 11% of the time, respectively. Seventy-nine percent of residents were prescribed at least one warfarin-interacting medication during the period in review. Residents receiving interacting medications spent less time in the therapeutic range (53.0% vs. 58.2%, OR = 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.88 to 0.97, P = 0.002). Adequacy of anticoagulation varied significantly between physicians (time in therapeutic range 45.9 to 63.9%).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this group of long-term care residents, warfarin control was suboptimal. Both prescriber and co-prescription of interacting medications were associated with poorer INR control. Future studies should seek strategies to improve prescriber skill and decrease use of interacting medications.</p

    Genotype- phenotype correlation and molecular heterogeneity in pyruvate kinase deficiency

    Full text link
    Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is a rare recessive congenital hemolytic anemia caused by mutations in the PKLR gene. This study reports the molecular features of 257 patients enrolled in the PKD Natural History Study. Of the 127 different pathogenic variants detected, 84 were missense and 43 non- missense, including 20 stop- gain, 11 affecting splicing, five large deletions, four in- frame indels, and three promoter variants. Within the 177 unrelated patients, 35 were homozygous and 142 compound heterozygous (77 for two missense, 48 for one missense and one non- missense, and 17 for two non- missense variants); the two most frequent mutations were p.R510Q in 23% and p.R486W in 9% of mutated alleles. Fifty- five (21%) patients were found to have at least one previously unreported variant with 45 newly described mutations. Patients with two non- missense mutations had lower hemoglobin levels, higher numbers of lifetime transfusions, and higher rates of complications including iron overload, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and pulmonary hypertension. Rare severe complications, including lower extremity ulcerations and hepatic failure, were seen more frequently in patients with non- missense mutations or with missense mutations characterized by severe protein instability. The PKLR genotype did not correlate with the frequency of complications in utero or in the newborn period. With ICCs ranging from 0.4 to 0.61, about the same degree of clinical similarity exists within siblings as it does between siblings, in terms of hemoglobin, total bilirubin, splenectomy status, and cholecystectomy status. Pregnancy outcomes were similar across genotypes in PK deficient women. This report confirms the wide genetic heterogeneity of PK deficiency.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154955/1/ajh25753.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154955/2/ajh25753_am.pd

    Comorbidities and complications in adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: Pyruvate kinase (PK) deficiency is caused by PKLR gene mutations, leading to defective red blood cell glycolysis and hemolytic anemia. Rates of comorbidities and complications by transfusion history and relative to the general population remain poorly quantified. METHODS: Data for patients aged ≄ 18 years with two confirmed PKLR mutations were obtained from the PK deficiency Natural History Study (NCT02053480). Frequencies of select conditions were compared with an age- and sex-matched cohort from a general insured US population without PK deficiency. RESULTS: Compared with the matched population (n = 1220), patients with PK deficiency (n = 122) had significantly higher lifetime rates of osteoporosis, liver cirrhosis, and pulmonary hypertension; splenectomy and cholecystectomy rates were also significantly higher in the 8 years before the index date. Sixty-five (53.3%) patients with PK deficiency were classified as regularly transfused, 30 (24.6%) as occasionally transfused, and 27 (22.1%) as never transfused. Regularly transfused patients were significantly more likely than never transfused patients to have had splenectomy, cholecystectomy, and/or thrombosis. Liver iron overload was reported in 62% of patients and occurred regardless of transfusion cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Even never transfused patients with PK deficiency had higher rates of select comorbidities and complications than individuals without PK deficiency

    Systematic review: D-dimer to predict recurrent disease after stopping anticoagulant therapy for unprovoked venous thromboembolism

    No full text
    Background: The optimal duration of anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) is uncertain. Methods for predicting risk for recurrence may identify low-risk patients who are less likely to benefit from prolonged anticoagulation. Purpose: To synthesize evidence evaluating the value of D-dimer as a predictor of recurrent disease in patients who have stopped anticoagulant therapy after a first unprovoked VTE. Data Sources: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched until March 2008 without language restrictions. The strategy was supplemented with manual review of reference lists and contact with content experts. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials or prospective cohort studies that measured D-dimer after anticoagulant therapy in patients who received at least 3 months of anticoagulant treatment of unprovoked VTE. Data Extraction: Two authors independently reviewed articles and extracted data. Data Synthesis: Seven studies, totaling 1888 patients with a first unprovoked VTE, were eligible for analysis. During 4500 person-years of follow up, annual rates of recurrent VTE differed statistically significantly: 8.9% (95% CI, 5.8% to 11.9%) in patients with positive D-dimer results and 3.5% (CI, 2.7% to 4.3%) in patients with negative D-dimer results. Limitation: The duration of anticoagulation, timing of D-dimer testing, and D-dimer assay varied across studies. Conclusion: In patients who have completed at least 3 months of anticoagulation for a first episode of unprovoked VTE and after approximately 2 years of follow-up, a negative D-dimer result was associated with a 3.5% annual risk for recurrent disease, whereas a positive D-dimer result was associated with an 8.9% annual risk for recurrence. These rates should inform decisions about the balance of risks and benefits of prolonging anticoagulation

    Quality of anticoagulation and use of warfarin-interacting medications in long-term care: A chart review-2

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Quality of anticoagulation and use of warfarin-interacting medications in long-term care: A chart review"</p><p>BMC Geriatrics 2008;8():13-13.</p><p>Published online 3 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2464578.</p><p></p

    Quality of anticoagulation and use of warfarin-interacting medications in long-term care: A chart review-1

    No full text
    <p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Quality of anticoagulation and use of warfarin-interacting medications in long-term care: A chart review"</p><p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/8/13</p><p>BMC Geriatrics 2008;8():13-13.</p><p>Published online 3 Jul 2008</p><p>PMCID:PMC2464578.</p><p></p

    Strategies for eliciting and synthesizing evidence for guidelines in rare diseases

    No full text
    Abstract Background Rare diseases are a global public health priority. Though each disease is rare, when taken together the thousands of known rare diseases cause significant morbidity and mortality, impact quality of life, and confer a social and economic burden on families and communities. These conditions are, by their nature, encountered very infrequently by individual clinicians, who may feel unprepared to address their diagnosis and treatment. Clinical practice guidelines are necessary to support clinical and policy decisions. However, creating guidelines for rare diseases presents specific challenges, including a paucity of high certainty evidence to inform panel recommendations. Methods This paper draws from the authors’ experience in the development of clinical practice guidelines for three rare diseases: hemophilia, sickle cell disease, and catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Results We have summarized a number of strategies for eliciting and synthesizing evidence that are compatible with the rigorous, internationally accepted standards for guideline development set out by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. These strategies include: use of pre-existing and ad hoc qualitative research, use of systematic observation forms, use of registry data, and thoughtful use of indirect evidence. Their use in three real guideline development efforts, as well as their theoretical underpinnings, are discussed. Avenues for future research to improve clinical practice guideline creation for rare diseases – and any disease affected by a relative lack of evidence - are also identified. Conclusions Rigorous clinical practice guidelines are needed to improve the care of the millions of people worldwide who suffer from rare diseases. Innovative evidence elicitation and synthesis methods will benefit not only the rare disease community, but also individuals with common diseases who have rare presentations, suffer rare complications, or require nascent therapies. Further refinement and improved uptake of these innovative methods should lead to higher quality clinical practice guidelines in rare diseases
    corecore