4 research outputs found

    The Italian Response to the 2009 H1N1 Pandemic.

    No full text
    In 2009, the global spread of pH1N1 prompted countries worldwide to intensify their efforts to protect the population's health to minimize the impact of the pandemic on society and the economy. Despite this common goal, considerable variability in health policies were observed around the world. This chapter analyzes the Italian public health system's infrastructure and organizational characteristics, and the policies implemented during the response to the 2009 H1N1 pandemic by using data obtained through semistructured interviews and a facilitated look-back activity. Italy and the United States faced similar challanges in the response to the pandemic, including difficulties in interpreting surveillance data, the late availability of the vaccine, and barriers in communication with the public in the midst of uncertainty regarding the evolution of the outbreak and media hype. However, the two countries differed in the way they addressed specific issues, mainly as a result of substantial differences in their organizational structure. This chapter analyzed the differences between Italy and the United States in the policies and procedures implemented to allocate vaccines, in the role and responsabilities of national and local public health agencies, and in the coordiantion of efforts between private and public providers. This chapter also aims to provide contextual informations to enable readers to understand the reasons behind specific public health decisions and, eventually, compare them with decisions undertaken in the United States. This chapter begins with a brief description of the context and characteristics of the Italian public health system, including a brief introduction to its organization, a history of major healthcare reforms, and a description of the steps undertaken during the past 10 years by national and regional governments in the development of pandemic preparedness plans. This description is followed by an analysis of the challanges, strategies, and decisions made in the response to the pandemic

    The Chikungunya epidemic in Italy and its repercussion on the blood system

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes and recently caused a massive epidemic on La R\ue9union Island, in the Indian Ocean. Between July and September 2007 it caused the first autochthonous epidemic outbreak in Europe, in the Region of Emilia-Romagna in the north-east of Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After the first reports of an unusually high number of patients with a febrile illness of unknown origin in two contiguous villages, an outbreak investigation was carried out to identify the primary source of infection, the modes of transmission and the dynamics of the epidemic. An active surveillance system was also implemented. Laboratory diagnosis was performed through serology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. Blood donation was discontinued in the areas involved from September to October 2007 and specific precautionary blood safety and self-sufficiency measures were adopted by the regional health and blood authorities and the National Blood Centre. An estimate method to early assess the risk of viraemic blood donations by asymptomatic donors was developed, as a tool for "pragmatic" risk assessment and management, aiming at providing a reliable order of magnitude of the mean risk of CHIKV transmission through blood transfusion. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen cases of CHIKV infection were identified between 4th July and 28th September. The disease was fairly mild in most of the cases. The precautionary measures adopted in the blood system caused a considerable reduction of the collection of blood components and of the delivery of plasma to the pharmaceutical industry for contract manufacturing. The estimated risk of CHIKV transmission through blood transfusion peaked in the third week of August. CONCLUSION: ACHIKV epidemic poses considerable problems for public health authorities, who not only need good routine programmes of vector control and epidemiological surveillance but also local and national emergency plans to sustain the blood supply, so as to promptly deal with the potentially severe effects of an epidemic outbreak, especially when affected areas locally require a significant blood inventory and at the same time represent a critical resource for other areas depending on external supplies of blood components

    Adapted Physical Activity for the Promotion of Health and the Prevention of Multifactorial Chronic Diseases: the Erice Charter

    No full text
    The Erice Charter was unanimously approved at the conclusion of the 47th Residential Course "Adapted Physical Activity in Sport, Wellness and Fitness: New Challenges for Prevention and Health Promotion", held on 20-24 April 2015 in Erice, Italy, at the "Ettore Majorana" Foundation and Centre for Scientific Culture, and promoted by the International School of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine "G. D'Alessandro" and the Study Group on Movement Sciences for Health of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health. After an intense discussion the participants identified the main points associated with the relevance of physical activity for Public Health, claiming the pivotal role of the Department of Prevention in coordinating and managing preventive actions. The participants underlined the importance of the physicians specialized in Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health. The contribution of other operators such as physicians specialized in Sport Medicine was stressed. Further, the holders of the new degree in Human Movement and Sport Sciences were considered fundamental contributors for the performance of physical activity and their presence was seen as a promising opportunity for the Departments of Prevention. Primary prevention based on recreational physical activities should become easily accessible for the population, avoiding obstacles such as certification steps or complex bureaucracy. The Sport Doctor is recognized as the principal referent for preliminary physical evaluation and clinical monitoring in secondary and tertiary prevention actions based on adapted physical activities. Developing research in the field is essential as well as implementing higher education on physical activity management in Schools of Public Health
    corecore