The new training paradigms and the unfilled match positions of 2004: Will history repeat itself?

ObjectiveThe new millennium has seen an increase in vascular residency vacancies. The American Board of Vascular Surgery recently proposed new training paradigms, but their impact on recruitment remains unknown. We surveyed vascular fellows regarding factors and timing of career decisions to determine an optimal strategy for recruitment.MethodsSurveys were sent electronically to vascular residents for completion. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Additional data were obtained from the National Resident Matching Program.ResultsOf the 90 fellows that responded, 84% committed to vascular surgery during residency. Of these, 18% decided during postgraduate year 1, 54% by year 2, 84% by year three, and 95% by year 4. Sixteen percent of all trainees decided in medical school. Seventy-three percent of residents performed a minimum of 20 to 50 cases before reaching a decision. Among the group deciding between years 2 to 4 of residency, there was a significant difference in the number of vascular rotations before career commitment (P = .0001). In the 2004 Match, 21% of vascular residency positions were unfilled, up from 12% in 2003, 9% in 2002, and 4% in 2001.ConclusionsLeaders in the field of vascular surgery have proposed focused training through the new paradigms. The incline in unmatched vascular residency positions over the past 4 years highlights the importance of a strategic plan to optimize recruitment. Few current trainees decided early in training about career choice, and volume appears critical to the decision process. Utilizing the current matching system (an 18-month process) and without any proactive change in recruitment, an integrated program after medical school would be reasonable for only 16% of applicants, or the 3+3 option for 54% of residents. For the new paradigms to be successful and to prevent more unfilled positions, increased medical student integration into vascular rotations and early active exposure to endovascular and open procedures during general surgical training will be necessary across the country

Outcomes after endovascular intervention for chronic critical limb ischemia

ObjectiveThis study evaluated outcomes after endovascular intervention (EVI) for chronic critical limb ischemia (CLI) by Rutherford category (RC) 4, rest pain; and 5, tissue loss.MethodsThe medical records of all EVI performed for RC-4 to RC-5 by vascular surgeons at a single institution during a 3-year period were reviewed for sustained clinical success (SCS), defined as Rutherford improvement score (RIS) 2+, without target extremity revascularization (TER). The RC-5 group was evaluated for patency until healing and healing ≤4 months without recurrence or new ulceration. Secondary sustained clinical success (SSCS) was a RIS of 2+ with TER. The RC-5 group was evaluated for patency until healing and healing at any time during follow-up, without recurrent or new ulceration. Significance was established at the 0.05 level.ResultsOf 106 EVI performed for CLI, 78 (74%) were RC-5. There were 39 (37%) men. Mean age was 73 ± 12 years. Mean follow-up was 19 months (range, 1-44 months). RC-5 patients were significantly more likely than RC-4 to be diabetic (58% vs 32%; P = .020), dialysis dependent (14% vs 0%; P = .036), and to require distal EVI (53% vs 29%; P = .029). RC-4 patients were more likely to be current smokers (57% vs 32%; P = .023). At 24 months, survival was comparable, with RC-4 at 84% ± 8% vs RC-5 at 62% ± 7% (P = .09), but limb salvage was significantly better for RC-4 (100%) vs RC-5 (83% ± 4%; P = .026), as was SCS (48% vs 21%; P = .006) and SSCS (85% vs 39%; P < .001). Independent predictors of failed SSCS were diabetes (odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-7.46; P = .036), congestive heart failure (CHF; OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.19-10.99; P = .023), and RC-5 (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.4-30.3; P = .001). SSCS was 94% in RC-4 patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) or CHF and 10% in RC-5 with DM or CHF (P < .001) but improved to 67% in RC-5 when neither CHF nor DM were present (P = .004).ConclusionsRC-4 have fewer comorbidities, less advanced ischemia, and better outcome than RC-5. These groups should be evaluated individually. Limb salvage was acceptable, yet early wound healing without TER (SCS) occurred in only 21%. RC-5, DM, and CHF were predictors of poor SSCS. Careful selection of patients should improve outcome