Dose-response relationship of locomotor training in patients with spinal cord injury : preliminary results

Background: A large proportion of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) regain ambulatory function. However, during the first 3 months most patients are unable to walk without support. To enable ambulatory training at such an early stage the body weight is partially relieved and leg movement assisted by two therapists. A more recent approach is the application of robotic-based assistance, which allows for longer training duration. From the science of motor learning and studies including patients with stroke, it is known that training effects depend on the duration of the training. Longer training results in a better walking function. Purpose: The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether prolonged robot-assisted walking training leads to a better walking outcome in patients with incomplete SCI, who are initially unable to walk independently (i.e. B and C according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of SCI-ISNCSCI), and whether such training is feasible or is associated with undesirable effects. Methods: Patients from three sites with an acute incomplete SCI (within 60 days after injury) were randomized to either standard training (session duration 25 minutes) or intensive training (session duration 50 minutes). After 8 weeks of training walking ability (Walking Index for SCI-WISCI, scale 0-20: 0=not able to walk, 20= able to walk independently), the occurrence of adverse events and the rate of perceived exertion (RPE, scale 1-10: 1=very light, 10= very, very hard), as well as patients’ global impression of change (PGIC, scale 0 -10: 0= much better, 5= no change, 10= much worse) were compared between groups. Results: Seventeen patients with incomplete SCI were randomly assigned either to standard training (ISNCSCI B: n=6; C: n=2) or to intensive training (B: n=3; C: n=6). The average duration of training of the standard group was half the length of the intensive group (24.9±0.6 minutes vs. 48.3±3.2 minutes; p=0.01). Both groups performed an equal number of training sessions within 8 weeks (33.8±6.8 and 34.9±6.0; n.s.). The median WISCI changed from 0 to 4 in the standard group (n.s.) and from 0 to 10.5 (p<0.05) in the intensive group. However, the group difference after training did not reach statistical significance. The median RPE (standard: 6.5, range 1-10 and intensive: 6, range 1-10; n.s.) and the PGIC (standard: 3.5, range 0-5; intensive: 2.5, range 1-4; n.s.) did not differ between the standard and intensive training groups. Conclusions: Longer training using a robotic device is feasible and is not associated with undesirable effects in patients with incomplete SCI. Results show a trend towards a positive dose-response relationship. However, there was a larger proportion of patients with a motor incomplete SCI (i.e. ISNCSCI: C) in the intensive training group. Implications: The duration of a standard training session needs to be re-addressed. Results indicate that more intensive training leads to a better outcome

Elevated Autoantibodies in Subacute Human Spinal Cord Injury Are Naturally Occurring Antibodies

Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in long-term neurological and systemic consequences, including antibody-mediated autoimmunity, which has been related to impaired functional recovery. Here we show that autoantibodies that increase at the subacute phase of human SCI, 1 month after lesion, are already present in healthy subjects and directed against non-native proteins rarely present in the normal spinal cord. The increase of these autoantibodies is a fast phenomenon–their levels are already elevated before 5 days after lesion–characteristic of secondary immune responses, further supporting their origin as natural antibodies. By proteomics studies we have identified that the increased autoantibodies are directed against 16 different nervous system and systemic self-antigens related to changes known to occur after SCI, including alterations in neural cell cytoskeleton, metabolism and bone remodeling. Overall, in the context of previous studies, our results offer an explanation to why autoimmunity develops after SCI and identify novel targets involved in SCI pathology that warrant further investigation

Immobility-associated thromboprotection is conserved across mammalian species from bear to human

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) comprising deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Short-term immobility-related conditions are a major risk factor for the development of VTE. Paradoxically, long-term immobilized free-ranging hibernating brown bears and paralyzed spinal cord injury (SCI) patients are protected from VTE. Here we aimed to identify mechanisms of immobility-associated VTE protection in a cross-species approach. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics revealed an antithrombotic signature in platelets of hibernating brown bears with heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) as most substantially reduced protein. HSP47 downregulation or ablation attenuated immune cell activation and NET formation, contributing to thromboprotection in bears, SCI patients and mice. This cross-species conserved platelet signature may give rise to antithrombotic therapeutics and prognostic markers beyond immobility-associated VTE

Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with acute incomplete spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled multicenter trial

The aim of this study was to evaluate if the effect of longer training times (50 instead of 25 minutes per day) using a robotic device results in a better outcome of walking ability of subjects with a sub-acute motor complete (AIS B) and incomplete (AIS C) spinal cord injury (SCI). Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study whereof, 18 completed on average 34 trainings in eight weeks. Longer training times resulted in better locomotor function. The second important result of the study is that a beneficial effect can be achieved by the application of a robotic device for prolonged training sessions without requiring more personal resources. It has to remain open whether even longer training times (more than 50 min) would result in a still better outcome. In any case, the extent of possible recovery in an individual patient is determined by the level and severity of spinal cord damage

Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers after Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study

Our objective was to track and quantify the natural course of serological markers over the 1st year following spinal cord injury. For that purpose, data on serological markers, demographics, and injury characteristics were extracted from medical records of a clinical trial (Sygen) and an ongoing observational cohort study (Murnau study). The primary outcomes were concentration/levels/amount of commonly collected serological markers at multiple time points. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and mixed-effects regression techniques were used to account for the longitudinal data and adjust for potential confounders. Trajectories of serological markers contained in both data sources were compared using the slope of progression. Our results show that, at baseline (<= 2 weeks post-injury), most serological markers were at pathological levels, but returned to normal values over the course of 6-12 months post-injury. The baseline levels and longitudinal trajectories were dependent on injury severity. More complete injuries were associated with more pathological values (e.g., hematocrit, ANOVA test; chi(2) = 68.93, df = 3, adjusted p value <0.001, and chi(2) = 73.80, df = 3, adjusted p value <0.001, in the Sygen and Murnau studies, respectively). Comparing the two databases revealed some differences in the serological markers, which are likely attributable to differences in study design, sample size, and standard of care. We conclude that because of trauma-induced physiological perturbations, serological markers undergo marked changes over the course of recovery, from initial pathological levels that normalize within a year. The findings from this study are important, as they provide a benchmark for clinical decision making and prospective clinical trials. All results can be interactively explored on the Haemosurveillance web site (https://jutzelec.shinyapps.io/Haemosurveillance/) and GitHub repository (https://github.com/jutzca/Systemic-effects-of-Spinal-Cord-Injury).ISSN:0897-7151ISSN:1557-904

Early Decompression (< 8 h) after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Improves Functional Outcome as Assessed by Spinal Cord Independence Measure after One Year

There is an ongoing controversy about the optimal timing for surgical decompression after acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). For this reason, we performed a retrospective study of patients who were operated on after traumatic cervical SCI at the Trauma Center Murnau, Germany, and who met inclusion as well as exclusion criteria (n = 70 patients). Follow-up data were collected prospectively according to the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury (EMSCI) protocol over a period of 1 year. Early decompression was defined as within the first 8 h after the insult (n = 35 patients). Primary outcome was the difference in the SCIM (Spinal Cord Independence Measure) 1 year after the trauma. After the follow-up period, patients who were decompressed earlier had a significantly higher SCIM difference (45.8 vs. 27.1, p < 0.005). A regression analysis showed that timing of decompression, age, as well as basal AIS (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale) and basal SCIM scores were independent predictors for a better functional outcome (SCIM). Further, patients from the early decompression group had better AIS grades (p < 0.006) and a higher AIS conversion rate (p < 0.029). Additionally, this cohort also had a better total motor performance as well as upper extremity motor function after 1 year (p < 0.025 and p < 0.002). The motor and neurological levels of patients who were operated on within 8 h were significantly more caudal (p < 0.003 and p < 0.014) after 1 year. The present study suggests that early decompression after traumatic cervical SCI might have a positive impact on the functional and neurological outcome of affected individuals