Exploring two methods of usability testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols

Think-aloud protocols are commonly used for the usability testing of instructional documents, Web sites and interfaces. This paper addresses the benefits and drawbacks of two think-aloud variations: the traditional concurrent think-aloud method and the less familiar retrospective think-aloud protocols. It also offers an outline of a long-term research project designed to empirically investigate the value of both variants. The results of a first comparative study indicate that, although the two methods have distinct differences, they do seem to produce a similar outcome. A more detailed description of the results will be offered during the presentation

Analyzing the interaction between facilitator and participants in two variants of the think-aloud method.

This paper focuses on the interaction between test participants and test facilitator in two variants of the think-aloud method. In a first, explorative study, we analyzed think-aloud transcripts from two usability tests: a concurrent think-aloud test and a constructive interaction test. The results of our analysis show that while the participants in both studies never explicitly addressed the facilitator, the think-aloud participants showed more signs of awareness of the facilitator than the participants in the constructive interaction test. This finding may have practical implications for the validity of the two methods

Contemporary Dutch Museums in a Post-Covid Era

During the current outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic, museums around the world have been forced to close their doors. Yet, responding to Covid-19 is just one of the challenges they are currently facing. In the aftermath of unprecedented times, international museum leaders are facing numerous obstacles and innovations. The debate about their future has become increasingly heated (Herwitz, 2021; Szántó 2020). The aim of this research is to consider different developments in the museum world, with an emphasis on the developments in the Netherlands

NARCIS & FREYA Can PIDs contribute to research in context?

Abstract: NARCIS, the national gateway to scholarly information in the Netherlands (www.narcis.nl) contains information about publications, datasets, research projects, researchers and organizations. NARCIS is an aggregated from various different sources; repositories, CRIS’s (Current Research Information System) and other sources such as funders. One of the aims of NARCIS is to show Research Information in its context. For a publication, context can mean one or more relations to different information types: the underlying data, the project, its funding or related publications. Relationships between the different information types provide essential context to research. Although this can seem to be a straightforward task, in practice there are many challenges. Especially in information exchange and aggregating information from different sources, PIDs are the only way to relate objects sustainably. In this session, we will discuss the possibilities of PID-Graphs by comparing NARCIS PID Graphs with ORCID PID Graphs as part of the EU project FREYA

De Praktijkverhalen verlenen waarde aan het lectoraat

Interview met Maaike de Jong in het teken van het Lectoraat Duurzame innovatie in de regionale kenniseconomie.Interview met Maaike de Jong in het teken van het Lectoraat Duurzame innovatie in de regionale kenniseconomie

De Praktijkverhalen verlenen waarde aan het lectoraat

Interview met Maaike de Jong in het teken van het Lectoraat Duurzame innovatie in de regionale kenniseconomie.Interview met Maaike de Jong in het teken van het Lectoraat Duurzame innovatie in de regionale kenniseconomie