6 research outputs found
Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: Support, role satisfaction, and advanced clinical practice within the European federation of radiographer society (EFRS) member countries
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordIntroduction
Increasing number of radiographers are undertaking image reporting throughout Europe. However, there are variations in practice and experience in European countries. The study aim was to investigate reporting radiographer's perceptions in relation to support for their role and workload satisfaction and elements of advanced practice that may also be undertaken.
Methods
Following institutional ethical approval an online 34 item questionnaire survey was circulated via social media; Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn in a 12-week period in 2022 across Europe. The survey data were managed by the online secure database REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Data was collected across a range of questions, of which those relating to support for, and barriers to radiographer reporting, role and job satisfaction, and other role elements are reported here.
Results
A response level of 345 individual reporting radiographers replied to the survey from 15 European countries; some questions were optional and therefore had a lower response rate. There was consensus about the need for support from radiologists and management, protected time, and funding to support the reporting role. The majority of respondents received additional pay for taking on this role and expressed satisfaction with their role and workload. In relation to elements of advanced practice, the majority of respondents were involved in educational and managerial activities, and there was interest, but limited involvement, in research.
Conclusion
There was a consensus about the support needed, and perceived barriers to, radiographer reporting, between reporting radiographers from different countries. Whilst there is some commonality in relation to activities such as supervision and education, there was clearer variety in relation to opportunities for research between the respondents, perhaps reflecting the differences between reporting as a standalone role development and reporting as part of an advanced clinical practice role.
Implications for practice
As there is increasingly an emphasis on advanced clinical practice, reporting radiographers are likely to require support to develop their skills so that they can actively participate in the broader activities associated with this role, including education, leadership, and research
Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: An overview of the role within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordINTRODUCTION: Reporting radiographers undertake an important role in healthcare and for the radiographer profession in general. First introduced in the United Kingdom, reporting radiographers are now practicing in several other European countries. Our objective was to investigate the workforce of reporting radiographers across the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) community. METHOD AND MATERIAL: A voluntary anonymous 34 item electronic survey was distributed online using social media accounts such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn covering a wide range of topics relating to professional role, advanced practice, education, and seniority. The questionnaire was distributed during a 12-week period in 2022. RESULT: A total of 345 individual responses were received from 15 countries with majorities of respondent from United Kingdom (n = 245, 71%) and Denmark (n = 66, 19%). Mean age was 41.9 (S.D 9.8), similar for females, 42.5 (S.D 9.0) and men 40.9 years (S.D 9.7). Most reporting radiographers worked in public hospitals (90%). The vast majority of the respondents (n = 270, n = 94%) authored and signed their own clinical reports while a minority (n = 18, 6%) stated that their reports were checked by radiologists. CONCLUSION: The survey highlights the scope of practice of reporting radiographers working in Europe. Reporting is becoming a career path for an increasing number of radiographers across Europe and there is assess to academic education and clinical support. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Reporting radiographers fulfil an important role within the current demands of healthcare. This demand is likely to increase in the future, and therefore it is vital that there is some form of standardisation in the level of education that this group of healthcare professionals receive
Reporting radiographers within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries - motivation for becoming a reporting radiographer
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordIntroduction: Radiographer-led reporting originated in the United Kingdom as a strategy to
reduce reporting backlog and time taken to report images. The effectiveness of reporting
radiographers has been demonstrated, but their motivational factors have not been thoroughly
explored. This survey aims to understand the incentives for radiographers to pursue
postgraduate education in reporting radiography across Europe.
Methods: An online survey was conducted, collecting data across a range of topics such as
demographic information, professional role, and job satisfaction. Questions assessing the
influence of motivational factors on the decision to become a reporting radiographer are
presented in this study. Descriptive statistics characterized the respondents' demographics.
The motivational aspects were analysed quantitatively by regression analyses. Thematic
analyses were performed for the free text responses on motivational aspects.
Results: 239 respondents from the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands,
Ireland, and Malta completed the survey's motivation section. Increased knowledge and new
challenges were the most motivating factors for becoming a reporting radiographer, while
less exposure to radiation and less patient contact were the least motivating factors. Job
satisfaction was a significant motivator. Gender significantly correlated with the importance
of social connections for female reporting radiographers. A cross-country comparison
showed that title and position and job security were more important for reporting
radiographers from the UK.
Conclusion: Taking in consideration that a sample of 239 is not generalisable for the role,
this survey does provides insights into the motivation behind being a reporting radiographer
in Europe. Factors such as increased knowledge, new challenges, and job satisfaction play
significant roles. Hindrances experienced by reporting radiographers included lack of time,
support, and standards, while aspirations for further professional development were
expressed.
Implications for practice: A thorough understanding of the motivation behind pursuing
postgraduate studies in reporting radiography is a valuable tool for managers, aiding in
fostering a positive work environment and attracting/keeping qualified personnel. The
findings of this study can be employed in the development of strategies to support and
enhance the practice of reporting
radiographers