Outcome of anal symptoms and anorectal function following two obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)-a nested case-controlled study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is a significant risk factor for developing anal incontinence. It can therefore be hypothesised that recurrent OASI in a subsequent delivery may predispose women to further anal sphincter dysfunction. METHODS: A nested case-controlled study based on data collected prospectively between 2006 and 2019. Women matched for age and ethnicity, with a history of one OASI and no sphincter damage in a subsequent delivery (control) were compared to women sustaining a second OASI. Assessment was carried out using the St Mark's score (SMIS), anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound scan (findings quantified using the modified Starck score). RESULTS: Eighty-four women were included and equally distributed between the two groups, who were followed up 12 weeks postnatally. No difference in SMIS scores was found. Maximum resting pressure (MRP, mmHg) and maximum squeeze pressure (MSP, mmHg) were significantly reduced in the study group. Median (IQR) MRP in the study group was 40.0 (31.3-54.0) versus 46.0 (39.3-61.5) in the control group (p = 0.030). Median (IQR) MSP was 73.0 (58.3-93.5) in the study group versus 92.5 (70.5-110.8) (p = 0.006) in the control group. A significant difference (p = 0.002) was found in the modified Starck score between the study group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0-6.0]) and control group (median 0.0 [IQR 0.0-0.0]). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that women with recurrent OASI do not have significant anorectal symptoms compared to those with one OASI 12 weeks after delivery, but worse anal sphincter function and integrity. Therefore, on long-term follow-up, symptoms may possibly develop. This information will be useful when counselling women in a subsequent pregnancy

Results of long-term retrograde rectal cleansing in patients with constipation or fecal incontinence

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the success rate, quality of life and predictive factors of success associated with long-term rectal cleansing (RC) for defecatory disorders. METHODS: All patients who started RC between January 2010 and August 2014 in our referral hospital were sent questionnaires concerning actual RC, Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FI-QoL) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). In addition, they were contacted in May and December 2015 for further follow-up information. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were offered RC, and 60 patients (45 women, 15 men) started RC. Thirty-three (55 %) patients stopped RC after a median time of 6 months. Twenty-seven (45 %) continued for a median time of 12 months. Forty-three (72 %) patients responded to the questionnaires. SF-36 showed that patients still using RC had more energy and were less fatigued than patients who discontinued therapy. No significant difference was found between patients who stopped and continued RC concerning age, gender, defecation disturbance, underlying disorders, anorectal function, colon-transit time, FI-QoL or BDI-score. Twenty-three patients (38 %) were still performing RC after 21 months, 22 patients (37 %) after 28 months and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RC is a moderately effective long-term alternative in patients who do not respond to medical therapy and biofeedback exercises. There is a high dropout rate in the first months, but a moderate rate of continuation in the period hereafter. No predictive factors for continuation were found in medical history or function tests. Those who continued RC performed better on the SF-36 subscale energy/fatigue