13 research outputs found

    DDT and metabolites residues in the southern bent-wing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii) of south-eastern Australia

    Full text link
    The southern bent-wing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii bassanii) is an insectivorous, obligate cave dwelling species found in south-eastern South Australia and western Victoria, Australia. In recent times, the finger of blame for an apparent population decline at Bat Cave, Naracoorte (one of only two known maternity roosts for this species, the other being Starlight Cave, Warrnambool) has been pointed at pesticide use in the region, following the finding of organochlorine and organophosphate insecticide residues in bat guano. This study sampled juvenile southern bent-wing bats from Bat Cave and Starlight Cave, and determined DDT, DDD and DDE concentrations in liver, pectoral muscle, brain and back-depot fat tissues. <br /

    Observations on the estrogenic activity and concentration of 17ß-estradiol in the discharges of 12 wastewater treatment plants in Southern Australia

    No full text
    There is very little information on the overall level of estrogenic activity, or concentrations of specific hormonal compounds in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges in Australia, compared with Europe, Japan, and North America. To partly address this, in 2004, water samples were collected as &quot;grab&quot; or &quot;spot&quot; samples from 12 WWTP facilities across southern Victoria at the point at which effluent enters the environment, either as recycled water or direct discharge to the receiving water. The WWTPs were of a variety of treatment types and served a diverse range of rural and regional municipalities. For instance, of the 12 WWTPs, 3 served municipalities with populations greater than 100,000, 4 with populations between 20,000 and 100,000, and 5 with populations less than 5,000. The principal treatment process in six was an activated sludge system, and three were trickle-filter-based systems. The remaining plants fall into a &quot;miscellaneous&quot; category, each plant having a mixture of treatment processes within the overall systems. The estrogenic activity and 17 beta-estradiol concentrations of the samples were assessed using a yeast-based, in vitro reporter gene assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays, respectively. Most of the effluents showed estrogenic activity in the assays (hER, no response: 7.9 ng/L EEQ; mER, no response: 44.5 ng/L EEQ). There was no correlation between estrogenic response and the results of a concurrent toxicity assay, suggesting that a lack of bioassay response was related to lack of estrogenic compounds, rather than the direct toxic effect of the sample. Estradiol concentrations were for the most part in the range 2-5 ng/L, with one sample at 18 ng/L. Despite the assurance our results might provide (of minimal impact in most cases if there is significant dilution), there is still a need for further extensive on-ground reassurance research to provide data for higher-level risk assessment by industry and government agencies. In particular, more research is warranted to verify the estrogenic activity and to expand the range of specific hormone/metabolites reported in these studies. Moreover, studies are required to determine if the estrogenic activity reported in this and other recent Australian studies is sufficient to induce a physiological effect in exposed aquatic organisms, especially Australian native fish

    Observations on the Estrogenic Activity and Concentration of 17b-Estradiol in the Discharges of 12 Wastewater Treatment Plants in Southern Australia

    No full text
    Abstract There is very little information on the overall level of estrogenic activity, or concentrations of specific hormonal compounds in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges in Australia, compared with Europe, Japan, and North America. To partly address this, in 2004, water samples were collected as ‘‘grab’’ or ‘‘spot’’ samples from 12 WWTP facilities across southern Victoria at the point at which effluent enters the environment, either as recycled water or direct discharge to the receiving water. The WWTPs were of a variety of treatment types and served a diverse range of rural and regional municipalities. For instance, of the 12 WWTPs, 3 served municipalities with populations greater than 100,000, 4 with populations between 20,000 and 100,000, and 5 with populations less than 5,000. The principal treatment process in six was an activated sludge system, and three were trickle-filter-based systems. The remaining plants fall into a ‘‘miscellaneous’’ category, each plant having a mixture of treatment processes within the overall systems. The estrogenic activity and 17b-estradiol concentrations of the samples were assessed using a yeast-based, in vitro reporter gene assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays, respectively. Most of the effluents showed estrogenic activity in the assays (hER, no response: 7.9 ng/L EEQ; mER, no response: 44.5 ng/L EEQ). There was no correlation between estrogenic response and the results of a concurrent toxicity assay, suggesting that a lack of bioassay response was related to lack of estrogenic compounds, rather than the direct toxic effect of the sample. Estradiol concentrations were for the most part in the range 2–5 ng/L, with one sample at 18 ng/L. Despite the assurance our results might provide (of minimal impact in most cases if there is significant dilution), there is still a need for further extensive on-ground reassurance research to provide data for higherlevel risk assessment by industry and government agencies. In particular, more research is warranted to verify the estrogenic activity and to expand the range of specific hormone/metabolites reported in these studies. Moreover, studies are required to determine if the estrogenic activity reported in this and other recent Australian studies is sufficient to induce a physiological effect in exposed aquatic organisms, especially Australian native fish

    Modeling of steroid estrogen contamination in UK and South Australian rivers predicts modest increases in concentrations in the future

    Get PDF
    The prediction of risks posed by pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the aquatic environment now and in the future is one of the top 20 research questions regarding these contaminants following growing concern for their biological effects on fish and other animals. To this end it is important that areas experiencing the greatest risk are identified, particularly in countries experiencing water stress, where dilution of pollutants entering river networks is more limited. This study is the first to use hydrological models to estimate concentrations of pharmaceutical and natural steroid estrogens in a water stressed catchment in South Australia alongside a UK catchment and to forecast their concentrations in 2050 based on demographic and climate change predictions. The results show that despite their differing climates and demographics, modeled concentrations of steroid estrogens in effluents from Australian sewage treatment works and a receiving river were predicted (simulated) to be similar to those observed in the UK and Europe, exceeding the combined estradiol equivalent’s predicted no effect concentration for feminization in wild fish. Furthermore, by 2050 a moderate increase in estrogenic contamination and the potential risk to wildlife was predicted with up to a 2-fold rise in concentrations
    corecore