26 research outputs found

    Effects of Preoperative Aspirin Use on Mortality in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients

    No full text
    Background and Aim: Discontinuing aspirin use in patients before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has focused on bleeding risks. The aim of this study was to determind the effect of aspirin use on overall mortality with this procedure.Materials and Methods: In a retrospective review was under taken of 2,252 consecutive isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures performed between July 1995 and May 3003 in Tehran, Shriati hospital. Patients who had isolated CABG operations and received aspirin were analyzed and compared to nonusers undergoing similar bypass procedures during the same period. Aspirin use was defined by identification of ingestion within 7 days before the operation.Results: CABG patients using preoperative aspirin were less likely to experience in hospital hemorrhage compared to nonusers (P=0.0001). Significant difference was seen for transfusion of blood products, and need for reexploration for hemorrhage between patients who did and did not receive aspirin (P=0.0001).Mortality in multivariate (odds ratio [OR] =0.12, 95%confidence interval [0.05, 0.28] analysis was less to patients using aspirin compared to nonusers (p=0.0001).Conclusions : Preoperative aspirin use appears to be associated with a decreased risk of mortality in CABG patients with significant increase in hemorrhage, blood product requirements, or related morbidities

    Comparing the Effects of Gamification and Teach-Back Training Methods on Adherence to a Therapeutic Regimen in Patients After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABGS) may fail to adhere to their treatment regimen for many reasons. Among these, one of the most important reasons for nonadherence is the inadequate training of such patients or training using inappropriate methods. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effect of gamification and teach-back training methods on adherence to a therapeutic regimen in patients after CABGS. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 123 patients undergoing CABGS in Tehran, Iran, in 2019. Training was provided to the teach-back group individually. In the gamification group, an app developed for the purpose was installed on each patient's smartphone, with training given via this device. The control group received usual care, or routine training. Adherence to the therapeutic regimen was assessed using a questionnaire on adherence to a therapeutic regimen (physical activity and dietary regimen) and an adherence scale as a pretest and a 1-month posttest. RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for comparing the mean scores of teach-back and gamification training methods showed that the mean normalized scores for the dietary regimen (P<.001, F=71.80), movement regimen (P<.001, F=124.53), and medication regimen (P<.001, F=9.66) before and after intervention were significantly different between the teach-back, gamification, and control groups. In addition, the results of the Dunnett test showed that the teach-back and gamification groups were significantly different from the control group in all three treatment regimen methods. There was no statistically significant difference in adherence to the therapeutic regimen between the teach-back and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, the use of teach-back and gamification training approaches may be suggested for patients after CABGS to facilitate adherence to the therapeutic regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials IRCT20111203008286N8; https://en.irct.ir/trial/41507
    corecore