Effects of steady state free precession parameters on cardiac mass, function, and volumes

G0400444/Medical Research Council/United Kingdom Wellcome Trust/United Kingdo

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in stable ischaemic heart disease

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is a new robust versatile non-invasive imaging technique that can detect global and regional myocardial dysfunction, presence of myocardial ischaemia and myocardial scar tissue in one imaging session without radiation, with superb spatial and temporal resolution, inherited three-dimensional data collection and with relatively safe contrast material. The reproducibility of CMR is high which makes it possible to use this technique for serial assessment to evaluate the effect of revascularisation therapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease

Intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular function, volumes and mass in patients with congenital heart disease measured by CMR imaging

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provides highly accurate measurements of biventricular volumes and mass and is frequently used in the follow-up of patients with acquired and congenital heart disease (CHD). Data on reproducibility are limited in patients with CHD, while measurements should be reproducible, since CMR imaging has a main contribution to decision making and timing of (re)interventions. The aim of this study was to assess intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular function, volumes and mass in a heterogeneous group of patients with CHD using CMR imaging. Thirty-five patients with CHD (7–62 years) were included in this study. A short axis set was acquired using a steady-state free precession pulse sequence. Intra-observer and interobserver variability was assessed for left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes, function and mass by calculating the coefficient of variability. Intra-observer variability was between 2.9 and 6.8% and interobserver variability was between 3.9 and 10.2%. Overall, variations were smallest for biventricular end-diastolic volume and highest for biventricular end-systolic volume. Intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular parameters assessed by CMR imaging is good for a heterogeneous group of patients with CHD. CMR imaging is an accurate and reproducible method and should allow adequate assessment of changes in ventricular size and global ventricular function

Determination of left ventricular long-axis orientation using MRI: changes during the respiratory and cardiac cycles in normal and diseased subjects

Background: It has previously been shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to accurately determine left ventricular (LV) long-axis orientation in healthy individuals. However, the inter- and intra-observer variability in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic heart failure (CHF) has not been explored. Furthermore, the changes in LV long-axis orientation because of respiration and during the cardiac cycle remain to be determined. Methods: LV long-axis orientation was determined by MRI in the frontal and transverse planes in 44 subjects with no cardiac disease, 20 ACS patients and 13 CHF patients. Changes in LV long-axis orientation because of respiration were assessed in a subset of 25 subjects. Changes during the cardiac cycle were assessed in six subjects from each subject group. Reproducibility was assessed by a re-examination of 17 subjects after 28 days. Results: The inter- and intra-observer variability for LV long-axis orientation was low for all subject groups. The difference between the baseline and the 28 days examinations was -1.4 +/- 5.9 degrees and -0.8 +/- 4.4 degrees in the frontal and transverse planes, respectively. No significant change in LV long-axis orientation was found between end-expiration and end-inspiration (frontal plane, P = 0.63 and transverse plane, P = 0.42; n = 25). No significant difference in change of the LV long-axis orientation during the cardiac cycle was found between the subject groups (frontal plane, chi-square 1.8, P = 0.40 and transverse plane, chi-square 5.7, P = 0.06). Conclusions: There is a low inter-and intra-observer variability and a high reproducibility for determining LV long-axis orientation in patients with no cardiac disease as well as in patients with ACS or CHF. There is no significant change in LV long-axis orientation due to respiration, and only small changes during the cardiac cycle in these groups