Red flags for the early detection of spinal infection in back pain patients

© 2019 The Author(s). Background: Red flags are signs and symptoms that are possible indicators of serious spinal pathology. There is limited evidence or guidance on how red flags should be used in practice. Due to the lack of robust evidence for many red flags their use has been questioned. The aim was to conduct a systematic review specifically reporting on studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of red flags for Spinal Infection in patients with low back pain. Methods: Searches were carried out to identify the literature from inception to March 2019. The databases searched were Medline, CINHAL Plus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Pedro, OpenGrey and Grey Literature Report. Two reviewers screened article texts, one reviewer extracted data and details of each study, a second reviewer independently checked a random sample of the data extracted. Results: Forty papers met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2224 cases of spinal infection were identified, of which 1385 (62%) were men and 773 (38%) were women mean age of 55 (± 8) years. In total there were 46 items, 23 determinants and 23 clinical features. Spinal pain (72%) and fever (55%) were the most common clinical features, Diabetes (18%) and IV drug use (9%) were the most occurring determinants. MRI was the most used radiological test and Staphylococcus aureus (27%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (12%) were the most common microorganisms detected in cases. Conclusion: The current evidence surrounding red flags for spinal infection remains small, it was not possible to assess the diagnostic accuracy of red flags for spinal infection, as such, a descriptive review reporting the characteristics of those presenting with spinal infection was carried out. In our review, spinal infection was common in those who had conditions associated with immunosuppression. Additionally, the most frequently reported clinical feature was the classic triad of spinal pain, fever and neurological dysfunction. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Transcontinental Railroad

This is a silver spoon with the Transcontinental railroad on the end.https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/fvw-souvenirs-and-novelties/1143/thumbnail.jp

Gettysburg Address spoon

This is a silver spoon with the Gettysburg address on the end.https://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/fvw-souvenirs-and-novelties/1142/thumbnail.jp

Topics, skills, and cases for an undergraduate musculoskeletal curriculum in Southern Africa : A consensus from local and international experts

Background: Most patients with orthopaedic pathology in low to middle-income countries are treated by nonspecialists. A curriculum to prepare undergraduate medical students for this duty should reflect the local pathology and skills that are required to manage patients in a resource-restricted environment. The aim of this study was to establish and prioritize a list of core orthopaedic-related knowledge topics, clinical cases, and skills that are relevant to medical students in southern Africa and areas with a similar clinical context. Methods: A modified Delphi consensus study was conducted with 3 interactive iterative rounds of communication and prioritization of items by experts from Africa, Europe, and North America. Preferred priorities were selected but were limited to 50% of all of the possible items. Percent agreement of ≥75% was defined as consensus on each of these items. Results: Most of the 43 experts who participated were orthopaedic surgeons from 7 different countries in southern Africa, but 28% were general practitioners or doctors working in primary or secondary-level facilities. Experts prioritized cases such as patients with multiple injuries, a limping child, and orthopaedic emergencies. Prioritized skills were manipulation and immobilization of dislocations and fractures. The most important knowledge topics included orthopaedic infections, the treatment of common fractures and dislocations, any red flags alerting to specialist referral, and back pain. Surgical skills for the treatment of urgent care conditions were included by some experts who saw a specific need in their clinical practice, but these were ranked lower. Conclusions: A wide geographic, academic, and expertise-specific footprint of experts informed this international consensus through their various clinical and academic circumstances. Knowledge topics, skills, and cases concerning orthopaedic trauma and infection were prioritized by the highest percent agreement. Acute primary care for fractures and dislocations ranked high. Furthermore, the diagnosis and the treatment of conditions not requiring specialist referral were prioritized. This study can inform national curricula in southern Africa and assist in the allocation of student clinical rotations