22 research outputs found

    Effect of physical activity intervention based on a pedometer on physical activity level and anthropometric measures after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Pregnancy and childbirth are associated with weight gain in women, and retention of weight gained during pregnancy can lead to obesity in later life. Diet and physical activity are factors that can influence the loss of retained pregnancy weight after birth. Exercise guidelines exist for pregnancy, but recommendations for exercise after childbirth are virtually nonexistent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of physical activity intervention based on pedometer on physical activity level and anthropometric measures of women after childbirth.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 66 women who had given birth 6 weeks to 6 months prior were randomly assigned to receive either a 12 week tailored program encouraging increased walking using a pedometer (intervention group, n = 32) or routine postpartum care (control group, n = 34). During the 12-week study period, each woman in the intervention group wore a pedometer and recorded her daily step count. The women were advised to increase their steps by 500 per week until they achieved the first target of 5000 steps per day and then continued to increase it to minimum of 10,000 steps per day by the end of 12<sup>th </sup>week. Assessed outcomes included anthropometric measures, physical activity level, and energy expenditure per week. Data were analyzed using the paired t-test, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, Wilcoxon, covariance analysis, and the general linear model repeated measures procedure as appropriate.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After 12 weeks, women in the intervention group had significantly increased their physical activity and energy expenditure per week (4394 vs. 1651 calorie, <it>p </it>< 0.001). Significant differences between-group in weight (<it>P </it>= 0.001), Body Mass Index (<it>P </it>= 0.001), waist circumference (<it>P </it>= 0.001), hip circumference (<it>P </it>= 0.032) and waist-hip ratio (<it>P </it>= 0.02) were presented after the intervention. The intervention group significantly increased their mean daily step count over the study period (from 3249 before, to 9960 after the intervention, <it>p </it>< 0.001).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A physical activity intervention based on pedometer is an effective means to increase physical activity; reducing retention of weight gained during pregnancy and can improve anthropometric measures in postpartum women.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ISRCTN: <a href="http://www.controlled-trials.com/IRCT201105026362N1">IRCT201105026362N1</a></p

    Microperimetric sensitivity in patients on hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) therapy

    No full text
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure macular sensitivity using microperimetry in patients on Plaquenil therapy without evidence of retinopathy as assessed by recommended screening standards. METHODS: Sixteen patients from a clinical practice treated with 200 or 400 mg/day of Plaquenil for more than 5 years, without visual complaints (visual acuity 20/25 or better), and without a history of diabetes or macular disease were included. Participants underwent a complete ophthalmic examination with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), 10-2 Humphrey visual field (HVF), fundus autofluoresecene (FAF), multifocal electroretinography (mfERG), and microperimetry that covered the central 12° of the visual field. Ten age-similar, visually normal subjects served as controls. RESULTS: The average age of the study cohort was of 54.5 years, with an average daily Plaquenil dose of 4.00 mg/kg/day (range, 1.77–6.67 mg/kg/day) and an average cumulative dose of 1485 g (range, 256–3650 g). All patients had normal ocular exams, and no evidence of retinopathy based on 10-2 HVF, FAF, mfERG, and SD-OCT. The mean retinal sensitivity by microperimetry was 15.0 dB (OD) and 14.6 dB (OS). The overall mean microperimetry sensitivity of the patients (14.7±1.9 dB) was significantly lower (P<0.001) than that of the controls (16.5±2.1 dB). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on Plaquenil without clinical evidence of retinal toxicity can have reduced retinal sensitivity, as assessed by microperimetry. The mean sensitivity difference between the patients and controls suggests that microperimetry can provide important information regarding visual function in patients on Plaquenil therapy
    corecore