Melatonin promoted chemotaxins expression in lung epithelial cell stimulated with TNF-α

BACKGROUND: Patients with asthma demonstrate circadian variations in the airway inflammation and lung function. Pinealectomy reduces the total inflammatory cell number in the asthmatic rat lung. We hypothesize that melatonin, a circadian rhythm regulator, may modulate the circadian inflammatory variations in asthma by stimulating the chemotaxins expression in the lung epithelial cell. METHODS: Lung epithelial cells (A549) were stimulated with melatonin in the presence or absence of TNF-α(100 ng/ml). RANTES (Regulated on Activation Normal T-cells Expressed and Secreted) and eotaxin expression were measured using ELISA and real-time RT-PCR, eosinophil chemotactic activity (ECA) released by A549 was measured by eosinophil chemotaxis assay. RESULTS: TNF-α increased the expression of RANTES (307.84 ± 33.56 versus 207.64 ± 31.27 pg/ml of control, p = 0.025) and eotaxin (108.97 ± 10.87 versus 54.00 ± 5.29 pg/ml of control, p = 0.041). Melatonin(10(-10 )to 10(-6)M) alone didn't change the expression of RNATES (204.97 ± 32.56 pg/ml) and eotaxin (55.28 ± 6.71 pg/ml). However, In the presence of TNF-α (100 ng/ml), melatonin promoted RANTES (410.88 ± 52.03, 483.60 ± 55.37, 559.92 ± 75.70, 688.42 ± 95.32, 766.39 ± 101.53 pg/ml, treated with 10(-10), 10(-9), 10(-8), 10(-7),10(-6)M melatonin, respectively) and eotaxin (151.95 ± 13.88, 238.79 ± 16.81, 361.62 ± 36.91, 393.66 ± 44.89, 494.34 ± 100.95 pg/ml, treated with 10(-10), 10(-9), 10(-8), 10(-7), 10(-6)M melatonin, respectively) expression in a dose dependent manner in A549 cells (compared with TNF-α alone, P < 0.05). The increased release of RANTES and eotaxin in A549 cells by above treatment were further confirmed by both real-time RT-PCR and the ECA assay. CONCLUSION: Taken together, our results suggested that melatonin might synergize with pro-inflammatory cytokines to modulate the asthma airway inflammation through promoting the expression of chemotaxins in lung epithelial cell

Group II Introns Break New Boundaries: Presence in a Bilaterian's Genome

Group II introns are ribozymes, removing themselves from their primary transcripts, as well as mobile genetic elements, transposing via an RNA intermediate, and are thought to be the ancestors of spliceosomal introns. Although common in bacteria and most eukaryotic organelles, they have never been reported in any bilaterian animal genome, organellar or nuclear. Here we report the first group II intron found in the mitochondrial genome of a bilaterian worm. This location is especially surprising, since animal mitochondrial genomes are generally distinct from those of plants, fungi, and protists by being small and compact, and so are viewed as being highly streamlined, perhaps as a result of strong selective pressures for fast replication while establishing germ plasm during early development. This intron is found in the mtDNA of an annelid worm, (an undescribed species of Nephtys), where the complete sequence revealed a 1819 bp group II intron inside the cox1 gene. We infer that this intron is the result of a recent horizontal gene transfer event from a viral or bacterial vector into the mitochondrial genome of Nephtys sp. Our findings hold implications for understanding mechanisms, constraints, and selective pressures that account for patterns of animal mitochondrial genome evolutio

Turnip yellow mosaic virus in Chinese cabbage in Spain: Commercial seed transmission and molecular characterization

[EN] Seed transmission of Turnip yellow mosaic virus (TYMV, genus Tymovirus) was evaluated in the whole seeds and seedlings that emerged from three commercial Chinese cabbage (Brassica pekinensis) seed batches. Seedlings in the cotyledon stage and adult plants were assayed for TYMV by DAS-ELISA and confirmed by RT-PCR. The proportion of whole seeds infected with TYMV was at least 0.15 %. The seeds of the three seed batches were grown in Petri dishes, and surveyed in the cotyledon stage in trays that contained a peat:sand mixture grown in greenhouses or growth chambers, which were analysed in the cotyledon and adult stages. The seed-to-seedling transmission rate ranged from 2.5 % to 2.9 % in two different seed batches (lot-08 and lot-09, respectively). Spanish isolates derived from turnip (Sp-03) and Chinese cabbage (Sp-09 and Sp-13), collected in 2003, 2009 and 2013 in two different Spanish regions, were molecularly characterised by analysing the partial nucleotide sequences of three TYMV genome regions: partial RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), methyltransferase (MTR) and coat protein (CP) genes. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the CP gene represented two different groups: TYMV-1 and TYMV-2. The first was subdivided into three subclades: European, Australian and Japanese. Spanish isolate Sp-03 clustered together with European TYMV group, whereas Sp-09 and Sp-13 grouped with the Japanese TYMV group, and all differed from group TYMV-2. The sequences of the three different genomic regions examined clustered into the same groups. The results suggested that Spanish isolates grouped according to the original hosts from which they were isolated. The inoculation of the Spanish TYMV isolates to four crucifer plants species (turnip, broccoli, Brunswick cabbage and radish) revealed that all the isolates infected turnip with typical symptoms, although differences were observed in other hosts.Alfaro Fernández, AO.; Serrano, A.; Tornos, T.; Cebrian Mico, MC.; Córdoba-Sellés, MDC.; Jordá, C.; Font San Ambrosio, MI. (2016). Turnip yellow mosaic virus in Chinese cabbage in Spain: Commercial seed transmission and molecular characterization. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY. 146(2):433-442. doi:10.1007/s10658-016-0929-3S4334421462Assis Filho, M., & Sherwood, J. L. (2000). Evaluation of seed transmission of Turnip yellow mosaic virus and Tobacco mosaic virus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytopathology, 90, 1233–1238.Benetti, M. P., & Kaswalder, F. (1983). Trasmisione per seme del virus del mosaico giallo rapa. Annali dell Istituto Sperimentale per la Patologia Vegetale, 8, 67–70.Blok, J., Mackenzie, A., Guy, P., & Gibbs, A. (1987). Nucleotide sequence comparisons of Turnip yellow mosaic virus isolates from Australia and Europe. Archives of Virology, 97, 283–295.Brunt, A., Crabtree, K., Dallwitz, M., Gibbs, A., Watson, L., & Zurcher, E.J. (1996). Plant Viruses Online: Descriptions and Lists from the VIDE Database. Version: 20th August 1996. URL http://biology.anu.edu.au/Groups/MES/vide/ .Campbell, R. N., Wipf-Scheibel, C., & Lecoq, H. (1996). Vector-assissted seed transmission of melon necrotic spot virus in melon. Phytopathology, 86, 1294–1298.Dreher, T. W., & Bransom, K. L. (1992). Genomic RNA sequence of Turnip yellow mosaic virus isolate TYMC, a cDNA-based clone with verified infectivity. Plant Molecular Biology, 18, 403–406.Fakhro, A., Von Bargen, S., Bandte, M., Büttner, C., Franken, P., & Schwarz, D. (2011). Susceptibility of different plant species and tomato cultivars to two isolates of Pepino mosaic virus. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 129, 579–590.Gibbs, A. J., & Gower, J. C. (1960). The use of a multiple-transfer method in plant virus transmission studies: some statistical points arising in the analysis of results. Annals of Applied Biology, 48, 75–83.Hayden, C. M., Mackenzie, A. M., & Gibbs, A. J. (1998a). Virion protein sequence variation among Australian isolates of turnip yellow mosaic tymovirus. Archives of Virology, 143, 191–201.Hayden, C. M., Mackenzie, A. M., Skotnicki, M. L., & Gibbs, A. (1998b). Turnip yellow mosaic virus isolates with experimentally produced recombinant virion proteins. Journal of General Virology, 79, 395–403.Hein, A. (1984). Transmission of Turnip yellow mosaic virus through seed of Camelina sativa gold of pleasure. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 91, 549–551.Herrera-Vásquez, J. A., Córdoba-Sellés, M. C., Cebrián, M. C., Alfaro-Fernández, A., & Jordá, C. (2009). Seed transmission of Melon necrotic spot virus and efficacy of seed-disinfection treatments. Plant Pathology, 58, 436–452.Hull, R. (2002). Matthews’ plant virology (4a ed.1001 pp). San Diego: Academic Press.Johansen, E., Edwards, M. C., & Hampton, R. O. (1994). Seed transmission of viruses: current perspectives. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 32, 363–386.Kirino, N., Inoue, K., Tanina, K., Yamazaki, Y., & Ohki, S. T. (2008). Turnip yellow mosaic virus isolated from Chinese cabbage in Japan. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 74, 331–334.Markham, R., & Smith, K. S. (1949). Studies on the virus of turnip yellow mosaic. Parasitology, 39, 330–342.Mathews, R. E. F. (1980). Turnip yellow mosaic virus, CMI/AAB Descriptions of plant virus No. 230 (No. 2 revised). Kew: Commonwealth Mycology Institute/Association of Applied Biologists.Mitchell, E. J., & Bond, J. M. (2005). Variation in the coat protein sequence of British isolates of Turnip yellow mosaic virus and comparison with previously published isolates. Archives of Virology, 150, 2347–2355.Pagán, I., Fraile, A., Fernández-Fueyo, E., Montes, N., Alonso-Blanco, C., & García-Arenal, F. (2010). Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for the study of plant-virus co-evolution. Philosophical Transations of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 365, 1983–1995.Paul, H. L., Gibbs, A., & Wittman-Liebold, B. (1980). The relationships of certain Tymoviruses assessed from the amino acid composition of their coat proteins. Intervirology, 13, 99–109.Pelikanova, J. (1990). Garlic mustard a spontaneous host of TYMV. Ochrana Rostlin, 26, 17–22.Procházková, Z. (1980). Host range and symptom differences between isolates of Turnip mosaic virus obtained from Sisymbrium loeselii. Biologia Plantarum, 22, 341–347.Rimmer, S. R., Shtattuck, V. I., & Buchwaldt, L. (2007). Compendium of brassica diseases (1ª Edición ed.p. 117). USA: APS press.Rot, M. E., & Jelkman, W. (2001). Characterization and detection of several filamentous viruses of cherry: Adaptation of an alternative cloning method (DOP-PCR), and modification of an RNA extraction protocol. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 107, 411–420.Sabanadzovic, S., Abou-Ghanem, N., Castellano, M. A., Digiaero, M., & Martelli, G. P. (2000). Grapevine fleck virus-like in Vitis. Archives of Virology, 145, 553–565.Špack, J., & Kubelková, D. (2000). Serological variability among European isolates of Radish mosaic virus. Plant Pathology, 49, 295–301.Špack, J., Kubelková, D., & Hnilicka, E. (1993). Seed transmission of Turnip yellow mosaic virus in winter turnip and winter oilseed rapes. Annals of Applied Biology, 123, 33–35.Stobbs, L. W., Cerkauskas, R. F., Lowery, T., & VanDriel, L. (1998). Occurrence of Turnip yellow mosaic virus on oriental cruciferours vegetables in Southern Ontario, Canada. Plant Disease, 82, 351.Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. (2011). MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28, 2731–2739

Mechanisms of leukocyte migration across the blood–retina barrier

Immune-mediated inflammation in the retina is regulated by a combination of anatomical, physiological and immuno-regulatory mechanisms, referred to as the blood–retina barrier (BRB). The BRB is thought to be part of the specialised ocular microenvironment that confers protection or “immune privilege” by deviating or suppressing destructive inflammation. The barrier between the blood circulation and the retina is maintained at two separate anatomical sites. These are the endothelial cells of the inner retinal vasculature and the retinal pigment epithelial cells on Bruch’s membrane between the fenestrated choroidal vessels and the outer retina. The structure and regulation of the tight junctions forming the physical barrier are described. For leukocyte migration across the BRB to occur, changes are needed in both the leukocytes themselves and the cells forming the barrier. We review how the blood–retina barrier is compromised in various inflammatory diseases and discuss the mechanisms controlling leukocyte subset migration into the retina in uveoretinitis in more detail. In particular, we examine the relative roles of selectins and integrins in leukocyte interactions with the vascular endothelium and the pivotal role of chemokines in selective recruitment of leukocyte subsets, triggering adhesion, diapedesis and migration of inflammatory cells into the retinal tissue

Neuronal Chemokines: Versatile Messengers In Central Nervous System Cell Interaction

Whereas chemokines are well known for their ability to induce cell migration, only recently it became evident that chemokines also control a variety of other cell functions and are versatile messengers in the interaction between a diversity of cell types. In the central nervous system (CNS), chemokines are generally found under both physiological and pathological conditions. Whereas many reports describe chemokine expression in astrocytes and microglia and their role in the migration of leukocytes into the CNS, only few studies describe chemokine expression in neurons. Nevertheless, the expression of neuronal chemokines and the corresponding chemokine receptors in CNS cells under physiological and pathological conditions indicates that neuronal chemokines contribute to CNS cell interaction. In this study, we review recent studies describing neuronal chemokine expression and discuss potential roles of neuronal chemokines in neuron–astrocyte, neuron–microglia, and neuron–neuron interaction

Chemokines in rheumatoid arthritis

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/46938/1/281_2004_Article_BF00832002.pd