Possible extracardiac predictors of aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome

BACKGROUND: According to previous studies, aortic diameter alone seems to be insufficient to predict the event of aortic dissection in Marfan syndrome (MFS). Determining the optimal schedule for preventive aortic root replacement (ARR) aortic growth rate is of importance, as well as family history, however, none of them appear to be decisive. Thus, the aim of this study was to search for potential predictors of aortic dissection in MFS. METHODS: A Marfan Biobank consisting of 79 MFS patients was established. Thirty-nine MFS patients who underwent ARR were assigned into three groups based on the indication for surgery (dissection, annuloaortic ectasia and prophylactic surgery). The prophylactic surgery group was excluded from the study. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) serum levels were measured by ELISA, relative expression of c-Fos, matrix metalloproteinase 3 and 9 (MMP-3 and -9) were assessed by RT-PCR. Clinical parameters, including anthropometric variables - based on the original Ghent criteria were also analyzed. RESULTS: Among patients with aortic dissection, TGF-beta serum level was elevated (43.78 +/- 6.51 vs. 31.64 +/- 4.99 ng/l, p < 0.0001), MMP-3 was up-regulated (Ln2alpha = 1.87, p = 0.062) and striae atrophicae were more common (92% vs. 41% p = 0.027) compared to the annuloaortic ectasia group. CONCLUSIONS: We found three easily measurable parameters (striae atrophicae, TGF-beta serum level, MMP-3) that may help to predict the risk of aortic dissection in MFS. Based on these findings a new classification of MFS, that is benign or malignant is also proposed, which could be taken into consideration in determining the timing of prophylactic ARR

An integrated clinical and molecular study of a cohort of Turkish patients with Marfan syndrome harboring known and novel FBN1 variants

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is an autosomal dominant genetic condition that mainly affects connective tissue in many parts of the body. Cardinal manifestations involve the ocular, skeletal, and cardiovascular systems. The diagnosis of MFS relies on the revised Ghent criteria, outlined by international expert opinion to facilitate accurate recognition of this syndrome as well as to improve patient management and counseling. However, it may not always be possible to make a definitive diagnosis according to these criteria in each patient and thus molecular confirmation is necessary in subjects with suspected MFS. This debilitating, if not fatal, disorder is caused by mutations in FBN1, which encodes a major constitutive element of extracellular microfibrils. Here, we present a detailed clinical and molecular analysis of 76 Turkish patients with definitive or suspected MFS diagnosed at our center between 2014 and 2019. We were able to identify a total of 51 different FBN1 variants in our cohort, 31 of which have previously been reported in the relevant scientific literature. The remaining 20 variants have not been documented to date. In one patient, we detected a large deletion including the entire FBN1 gene using the array CGH approach. Currently, there are very few studies on the genotype-phenotype correlation of patients with MFS, and no clear genotype-phenotype maps for MFS have been constructed so far, except for some cases. We believe that our findings will make a rich and peculiar contribution to the elusive genotype-phenotype relationship in MFS, especially in this large and populous ethnic group.WOS:0006100281000012-s2.0-85099760154PubMed: 3348358