Happiness economics

There is enough evidence to be confident that individuals are able and willing to provide a meaningful answer when asked to value on a finite scale their satisfaction with their own lives, a question that psychologists have long and often posed to respondents of large questionnaires. Without taking its limitations and criticisms too lightly, some economists have been using thismeasure of self-reported satisfaction as a proxy for utility so as to contribute to a better understanding of individuals' tastes and hopefully behavior. By means of satisfaction questions we can elicit information on individual likes and dislikes over a large set of relevant issues, such as income, working status and job amenities, the risk of becoming unemployed, inflation, and health status. This information can be used to evaluate existing ideas from a new perspective, understand individual behavior, evaluate and design public policies, study poverty and inequality, and develop a preference based valuation method. In this article I first critically assess the pros and cons of using satisfaction variables, and then discuss its main applications

The Role of Spousal Income in the Wife’s Happiness

© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.Few studies have examined spousal income in the context of happiness. This paper analyzes the Indonesia family life survey and finds a positive relationship between the husband’s income and his wife’s happiness. Specifically, a 100 % increase in the husband’s income is related to a 0.72 % point increase in his wife expressing very happy, which is about 11 % of the proportion expressing that response. Surprisingly, among the husband’s characteristics, only his income (along with health) is statistically significantly related to his wife’s happiness. This positive relationship is particularly strong among old, educated, and poor (in absolute and relative terms) urban residents

Different Versions of the Easterlin Paradox: New Evidence for European countries

According to the Easterlin Paradox, richer people are happier than poorer people, but when a country becomes richer over time, its people do not become happier. There is debate on whether this paradox holds. To shed light on this controversy, we distinguish between five different versions of the paradox. They apply to either groups of countries or individual countries, and to either the long or the medium term. We argue that the long term is most appropriate for testing the paradox, and that tests of the paradox should control for an autonomous time trend. We conduct such tests by estimating country-panel equations for mean life satisfaction in 27 European countries that include trend and cyclical components of per capita GDP as regressors. Concerning groups of countries, we find a robust confirmation of the long- and medium-term versions of the paradox for a group of nine Western and Northern European countries. Moreover, we obtain a non-robust rejection of the medium-term variant of the paradox for a set of 11 Eastern European countries. Regarding individual countries, the medium-term variant of the paradox holds for the nine Western and Northern European countries, but is rejected for Greece, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Bulgaria, Lithuania, and Poland