One-day core needle biopsy in a breast clinic: 4 years experience

Contains fulltext : 118897pub.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access) Contains fulltext : 118897pos.pdf (postprint version ) (Open Access)Many attempts have been made to combine the high diagnostic accuracy and conclusive rate of core needle biopsy (CNB) with the speed of fine needle aspiration cytology in evaluation of solid breast lesions. Multiple hybrid techniques have been developed to achieve this. We describe a cohort of patients for whom we used a relatively new, accelerated method of CNB processing, allowing for a definitive diagnosis the same day. All patients visiting the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre breast clinic during a 4-year period were reviewed to identify all CNBs in this period performed in a same-day diagnosis track. CNB result was compared to post-operative pathology reports when available, and to follow-up when patients were not surgically treated. 1,060 patients underwent CNB of 1,383 lesions, 898 of which in a same-day diagnosis track with a sensitivity of 96.9 % and a specificity of 99.4 %. The inconclusive rate was 9.2 %. For a same-day diagnosis for solid breast lesions, we could give a conclusive diagnosis with accelerated CNB processing in 65 % of our patients requiring CNB. This technique can be used reliably in a same-day diagnosis breast clinic with a very high sensitivity, specificity, and conclusive rate

Differences in sentinel lymph node pathology protocols lead to differences in surgical strategy in breast cancer patients.

Contains fulltext : 50705tjan-heijnen.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)BACKGROUND: Internationally, there is no consensus on the pathology protocol to be used to examine the sentinel lymph node (SN). At present, therefore, various hospitals use different SN pathology protocols of which the effect has not been fully elucidated. We hypothesized that differences between hospitals in SN pathology protocols affect subsequent surgical treatment strategies. METHODS: Patients from four hospitals (A-D) were prospectively registered when they underwent an SN biopsy. In hospitals A, B, and C, three levels of the SN were examined pathologically, whereas in hospital D, at least seven additional levels were examined. In the absence of apparent metastases with hematoxylin and eosin examination, immunohistochemical examination was performed in all four hospitals. RESULTS: In total, 541 eligible patients were included. In hospital D, more patients were diagnosed with a positive SN (P < .001) as compared with hospitals A, B, and C, mainly because of increased detection of isolated tumor cells. This led to more completion axillary lymph node dissections in hospital D (66.3% of patients (P < .0001), compared with 29.0% in hospitals A, B, and C combined). Positive non-SNs were detected in 13.9% of patients in hospital D, compared with 9.7% in hospitals A, B, and C (P = .70). That is, in 52.4% of patients in hospital D, a negative completion axillary lymph node dissection was performed, compared with 19.3% of patients in hospitals A, B, and C combined. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in SN pathology protocols between hospitals do have a substantial effect on SN findings and subsequent surgical treatment strategies. Whether ultrastaging and, thus, additional surgery can offer better survival remains to be determined

Efficacy of Different Technical Procedures for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Gastric Cancer Staging

Background: The clinical impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in gastric cancer is controversial. We performed a prospective trial to compare different methods: radiocolloid method (RM), dye method (DM), and both methods simultaneously (dual method, or DUM) for reliability and therapeutic consequences. Methods: RM and DM were applied in 35 gastric cancer patients. After endoscopic peritumoral injection of (99m)Tc-colloid and Patent Blue V, the positions of all blue sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were recorded, and the SLNs microscopically examined by hematoxylin and eosin, step sections, and immunohistochemistry. Results: RM, DM, and DUM identified the SLNs in 34 (97%) of 35 patients. The sensitivity for the prediction of positive lymph node status for RM was 22 (92%) of 24, for DM 16 (66%) of 24, and for DUM 22 (92%) of 24. In 7 of 17 (RM), 5 of 15 (DM), and 7 of 17 (DUM) patients classified as N0 by routine hematoxylin and eosin staining, micrometastases or isolated tumor cells were found in the SLN (upstaging) after focused examination. If only a limited lymph node dissection of the SLN basins would have been performed in patients, residual lymph node metastases were left in 9 of 24 (RM), in 7 of 34 (DM), and in 5 of 24 (DUM) of patients with node-positive disease. Conclusions: Use of RM was superior. DUM did not further increase the sensitivity. A limited lymph node dissection-i.e., lymphatic basin in patients with SLN-positive disease-is associated with a high risk of residual metastases. Patients with negative SLNs may be selected for a limited surgical procedure if they meet certain criteria