Ectopic Hormones-Secreting Pheochromocytoma: A Francophone Observational Study

Background Ectopic hormone-secreting pheochromocytomas are rare; only case reports exist in the literature. This condition has been linked with increased malignancy, familial syndromes, and ACTH secretion. We wanted to test these hypotheses and shed light on the nature of ectopic hormone-secreting pheochromocytomas. Methods This is a multicenter (francophone) observational study. Inclusion was based upon abnormal preoperative hormone tests in patients with pheochromocytoma that normalized after removal of the tumor. Where possible, immunohistochemistry was performed to confirm that ectopic secretion came from the tumor. Results Sixteen cases were found: nine female and seven male patients. Median age was 50.5 (range 31–89) years. Most presented with hypertension, diabetes, or cushingoid features. Ten patients had specific symptoms from the ectopic hormone secretion. Two had a familial syndrome. Of eight patients with excess cortisol secretion, three died as a result of the tumor resection: two had pheochromocytomas[ 15 cm and their associated cortisol hypersecretion complicated their postoperative course. The other died from a torn subhepatic vein. The 13 survivors did not develop any evidence of malignancy during follow-up (median 50 months). Symptoms from the ectopic secretion resolved after removal of the tumor. Immunohistochemistry was performed and was positive in eight tumors: five ACTH, three calcitonins, and one VIP. Conclusions Most pheochromocytomas with ectopic secretion are neither malignant nor familial. Most ectopic hormone-secreting pheochromocytoma cause hypercortisolemia. Patients with a pheochromocytoma should be worked up for ectopic hormones, because removal of the pheochromocytoma resolves those symptoms. Associated cortisol secretion needs careful attention

Corticosteroid treatment and intensive insulin therapy for septic shock in adults: a randomized controlled trial

International audienceCONTEXT: Corticosteroid therapy induces potentially detrimental hyperglycemia in septic shock. In addition, the benefit of adding fludrocortisone in this setting is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To test the efficacy of intensive insulin therapy in patients whose septic shock was treated with hydrocortisone and to assess, as a secondary objective, the benefit of fludrocortisone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A multicenter, 2 x 2 factorial, randomized trial, involving 509 adults with septic shock who presented with multiple organ dysfunction, as defined by a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 8 or more, and who had received hydrocortisone treatment was conducted from January 2006 to January 2009 in 11 intensive care units in France. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: continuous intravenous insulin infusion with hydrocortisone alone, continuous intravenous insulin infusion with hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone, conventional insulin therapy with hydrocortisone alone, or conventional insulin therapy with intravenous hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone. Hydrocortisone was administered in a 50-mg bolus every 6 hours, and fludrocortisone was administered orally in 50-microg tablets once a day, each for 7 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: In-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of the 255 patients treated with intensive insulin, 117 (45.9%), and 109 of 254 (42.9%) treated with conventional insulin therapy died (relative risk [RR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.30; P = .50). Patients treated with intensive insulin experienced significantly more episodes of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) than those in the conventional-treatment group, with a difference in mean number of episodes per patient of 0.15 (95% CI, 0.02-0.28; P = .003). At hospital discharge, 105 of 245 patients treated with fludrocortisone (42.9%) died and 121 of 264 (45.8%) in the control group died (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.77-1.14; P = .50). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with conventional insulin therapy, intensive insulin therapy did not improve in-hospital mortality among patients who were treated with hydrocortisone for septic shock. The addition of oral fludrocortisone did not result in a statistically significant improvement in in-hospital mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00320099