11 research outputs found

    Efficacy of short-term cyclosporine treatment to control psoriasis-related events during efalizumab therapy

    No full text
    Efalizumab is a recombinant humanized anti-CD11a monoclonal antibody that blocks the activation, adhesion and trafficking of T cells and has been approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. To document management of the fluctuations in symptom control that patients with psoriasis sometimes experience during treatment, we performed a retrospective analysis of our experience using cyclosporine as an intercurrent treatment to control psoriasis-related adverse events (AEs) in 10 patients who had received continuous efalizumab therapy for 20-200 weeks prior to recurrence of symptoms. Combination therapy with cyclosporine and efalizumab was generally well tolerated and controlled the relapse effectively. There were no reports of severe AEs during combination treatment, and no clinically significant changes were noted in clinical and laboratory values. Although mild, localized psoriasis recurred in most of these patients after cyclosporine termination, no patient experienced rebound or psoriasis flare and all continued with long-term efalizumab treatment. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Base

    The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection.

    No full text
    The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate the first evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) before and during the International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) meeting in Miami (March 2019). MIPR has seen rapid development in the past decade. Promising outcomes have been reported by early adopters from high-volume centers. Subsequently, multicenter series as well as randomized controlled trials were reported; however, guidelines for clinical practice were lacking. The Scottisch Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used, incorporating these 4 items: systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to answer clinical questions, whenever possible in PICO style, the GRADE approach for assessment of the quality of evidence, the Delphi method for establishing consensus on the developed recommendations, and the AGREE-II instrument for the assessment of guideline quality and external validation. The current guidelines are cosponsored by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Pancreas Club, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgery, the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. After screening 16,069 titles, 694 studies were reviewed, and 291 were included. The final 28 recommendations covered 6 topics; laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, as well as patient selection, training, learning curve, and minimal annual center volume required to obtain optimal outcomes and patient safety. The IG-MIPR using SIGN methodology give guidance to surgeons, hospital administrators, patients, and medical societies on the use and outcome of MIPR as well as the approach to be taken regarding this challenging type of surgery
    corecore