17 research outputs found

    Eroding market stability by proliferation of financial instruments

    Full text link
    We contrast Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT), the theoretical basis for the development of financial instruments, with a dynamical picture of an interacting market, in a simple setting. The proliferation of financial instruments apparently provides more means for risk diversification, making the market more efficient and complete. In the simple market of interacting traders discussed here, the proliferation of financial instruments erodes systemic stability and it drives the market to a critical state characterized by large susceptibility, strong fluctuations and enhanced correlations among risks. This suggests that the hypothesis of APT may not be compatible with a stable market dynamics. In this perspective, market stability acquires the properties of a common good, which suggests that appropriate measures should be introduced in derivative markets, to preserve stability.Comment: 26 pages, 8 figure

    Variety and Volatility in Financial Markets

    Full text link
    We study the price dynamics of stocks traded in a financial market by considering the statistical properties both of a single time series and of an ensemble of stocks traded simultaneously. We use the nn stocks traded in the New York Stock Exchange to form a statistical ensemble of daily stock returns. For each trading day of our database, we study the ensemble return distribution. We find that a typical ensemble return distribution exists in most of the trading days with the exception of crash and rally days and of the days subsequent to these extreme events. We analyze each ensemble return distribution by extracting its first two central moments. We observe that these moments are fluctuating in time and are stochastic processes themselves. We characterize the statistical properties of ensemble return distribution central moments by investigating their probability density functions and temporal correlation properties. In general, time-averaged and portfolio-averaged price returns have different statistical properties. We infer from these differences information about the relative strength of correlation between stocks and between different trading days. Lastly, we compare our empirical results with those predicted by the single-index model and we conclude that this simple model is unable to explain the statistical properties of the second moment of the ensemble return distribution.Comment: 10 pages, 11 figure

    Common Scaling Patterns in Intertrade Times of U. S. Stocks

    Full text link
    We analyze the sequence of time intervals between consecutive stock trades of thirty companies representing eight sectors of the U. S. economy over a period of four years. For all companies we find that: (i) the probability density function of intertrade times may be fit by a Weibull distribution; (ii) when appropriately rescaled the probability densities of all companies collapse onto a single curve implying a universal functional form; (iii) the intertrade times exhibit power-law correlated behavior within a trading day and a consistently greater degree of correlation over larger time scales, in agreement with the correlation behavior of the absolute price returns for the corresponding company, and (iv) the magnitude series of intertrade time increments is characterized by long-range power-law correlations suggesting the presence of nonlinear features in the trading dynamics, while the sign series is anti-correlated at small scales. Our results suggest that independent of industry sector, market capitalization and average level of trading activity, the series of intertrade times exhibit possibly universal scaling patterns, which may relate to a common mechanism underlying the trading dynamics of diverse companies. Further, our observation of long-range power-law correlations and a parallel with the crossover in the scaling of absolute price returns for each individual stock, support the hypothesis that the dynamics of transaction times may play a role in the process of price formation.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figures. Presented at The Second Nikkei Econophysics Workshop, Tokyo, 11-14 Nov. 2002. A subset appears in "The Application of Econophysics: Proceedings of the Second Nikkei Econophysics Symposium", editor H. Takayasu (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 2003) pp.51-57. Submitted to Phys. Rev. E on 25 June 200

    Effective return, risk aversion and drawdowns

    No full text
    We derive two risk-adjusted performance measures for investors with risk averse preferences. Maximizing these measures is equivalent to maximizing the expected utility of an investor. The first measure, Xeff, is derived assuming a constant risk aversion while the second measure, Reff, is based on a stronger risk aversion to clustering of losses than of gains. The clustering of returns is captured through a multi-horizon framework. The empirical properties of Xeff, Reff are studied within the context of real-time trading models for foreign exchange rates and their properties are compared to those of more traditional measures like the annualized return, the Sharpe Ratio and the maximum drawdown. Our measures are shown to be more robust against clustering of losses and have the ability to fully characterize the dynamic behaviour of investment strategies

    A formalization of double auction market dynamics

    No full text
    Biographical notes on contributors: Edward Tsang has a first degree in Business Administration (Major in Finance) and a PhD in Computer Science. He has broad interest in applied artificial intelligence, in particularly computational finance, heuristic search, constraint satisfaction and scheduling. He is currently a professor in computer science at the University of Essex where he leads the Computational Finance Group and Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization Group. He is also the Director of the Centre for Computational Finance and Economic Agents (CCFEA), an interdisciplinary centre. He founded and chaired the Technical Committee for Computational Finance under the IEEE Computational Intelligence Society in 2004-2005. Richard Olsen has a Master in Economics from Oxford University and a PhD in law from the University of Zurich. He has specialized in high frequency finance and has been a pioneer of this discipline. In 1995, he co-organized the first conference in the field. In 2001, he and his team published a book, ‘Introduction to High Frequency Finance’, Academic Press. He is CEO of Olsen Ltd, a systematic asset management company based in Zurich and co-founde

    Rolling Analysis of Time Series

    No full text
    corecore