Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention timing on 5-year outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The ‘wait a day’ approach might be safer

Background The OPTIMA trial was a randomised multicentre trial exploring the influence of the timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on patient outcomes in an intermediate to high risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) population. In order to decide the best treatment strategy for patients presenting with NSTEACS, long-term outcomes are essential. Methods Five-year follow-up data from 133 of the 142 patients could be retrieved (94 %). The primary endpoint was a composite of death and spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI). Spontaneous MI was defined as MI occurring more than 30 days after randomisation. Secondary endpoints were the individual outcomes of death, spontaneous MI or re-PCI. Results No significant difference with respect to the primary endpoint was observed (17.8 vs. 10.1 %; HR 1.55, 95 % CI: 0.73–4.22, p = 0.21). There was no significant difference in mortality rate. However, spontaneous MI was significantly more common in the group receiving immediate PCI (11.0 vs. 1.4 %; HR 4.46, 95 % CI: 1.21–16.50, p = 0.02). We did not find a significant difference between the groups with respect to re-PCI rate. Conclusion There was no difference in the composite of death and spontaneous MI. The trial suggests an increased long-term risk of spontaneous MI for patients treated with immediate PCI

Open surgical retrieval of a migrated patent foramen ovale closure device from the descending aorta following failed percutaneous retrieval from the aortic arch: a case report with a word of caution.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is considered safe and has been used widely for over 25 years. A rare but potentially life-threatening complication is device migration, especially to the aorta. CASE SUMMARY: We present a 30-year-old male with a PFO occlusion device implanted for cryptogenic stroke, which asymptomatically migrated to the aortic arch. A percutaneous retrieval attempt failed at complete removal but relocated the device to the proximal descending aorta. It was then successfully removed by open surgery. Severe intimal damage necessitated resection and interposition grafting. DISCUSSION: Manipulation of migrated intravascular devices can cause intimal damage and subsequent complications, such as local dissections. We advocate caution with percutaneous removal of such large, migrated closure devices to avoid additional intimal damage, especially after endothelialization has occurred. The interventional cardiologist should be aware of the risk of intimal damage as a result, and surgical removal, though invasive, should always be considered

A randomized trial assessing the effect of coumarins started before coronary angioplasty on restenosis: results of the 6-month angiographic substudy of the Balloon Angioplasty and Anticoagulation Study (BAAS).

Item does not contain fulltextBACKGROUND: Thrombus formation during coronary angioplasty may play a role in the restenosis process. METHODS: The effect of pretreatment with coumarins on 6-month angiographic outcome was studied. In addition, the effect of "optimal" anticoagulation, defined as an international normalized ratio >70% of the follow-up time in the target range, was studied. A total of 261 patients were assigned to aspirin alone (ASA group) and 270 patients to aspirin plus coumarins started 1 week before the procedure (coumarin group). RESULTS: The mean international normalized ratio was 2.7 +/- 1.2 at the start of the procedure and 3.1 +/- 0.5 during follow up. Quantitative coronary analysis was performed on 301 lesions in the ASA group and of 297 lesions in the coumarin group. At 6 months, the minimal luminal diameter was similar in the ASA and coumarin groups. Optimal anticoagulation, however, was an independent predictor of a larger minimal luminal diameter at follow up (P =.01). CONCLUSION: Overall, coumarins do not improve angiographic outcome 6 months after coronary angioplasty

Influence of planned six-month follow-up angiography on late outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this research was to study the effect of planned angiography on late clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: It is still largely unknown whether planned follow-up angiography after coronary angioplasty influences late outcome. METHODS: Randomization assigned 527 patients to clinical follow-up alone and 531 to clinical and six-month angiographic follow-up. The effect of planned angiography on clinical outcome at one and three years after coronary angioplasty was studied. RESULTS: The two groups were well matched. At one year, more events occurred in the angiographic group than in the clinical group: 122 (23.2%) versus 88 (16.7%) (p = 0.01). While the incidence of death or myocardial infarction (MI) was similar at one year, the revascularization rate was higher in the angiographic group: 113 (21.3%) versus 67 (12.7%) (relative risk = 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.3 to 2.3, p = 0.0003). At three years, still more events had occurred in the angiographic group (146 [34.5%] vs. 114 [26.3%], p = 0.03). More reinterventions did not improve late survival. However, there was a nonsignificant reduction in MI (7 [1.3%] vs. 13 [2.5%], p = NS) and a significant improvement in functional class at the end of follow-up (freedom from angina 81% vs. 74%, p = 0.03). The effect of follow-up angiography on the reintervention rate was similar for stented and nonstented patients. CONCLUSIONS: Planned follow-up angiography to evaluate the late results of coronary intervention led to a 1.7 times higher reintervention rate. This effect was similar for stented and nonstented patients. More reinterventions did not improve survival but tended to reduce the incidence of MI and led to a significantly better functional class at follow-up