5,601 research outputs found

    Local Maximum Entropy Shape Functions Based FE-EFGM Coupling

    Get PDF
    In this paper, a new method for coupling the finite element method (FEM)and the element-free Galerkin method (EFGM) is proposed for linear elastic and geometrically nonlinear problems using local maximum entropy shape functions in theEFG zone of the problem domain. These shape functions possess a weak Kroneckerdelta property at the boundaries which provides a natural way to couple the EFGand the FE regions as compared to the use of moving least square basis functions.In this new approach, there is no need for interface/transition elements between theEFG and the FE regions or any other special treatment for shape function continuity across the FE-EFG interface. One- and two-dimensional linear elastic and two-dimensional geometrically nonlinear benchmark numerical examples are solved by the new approach to demonstrate the implementation and performance of the current approach

    Criminal Law Reform and the Law Reviews

    Full text link

    A Third Parallel Primrose Path: The Supreme Court\u27s Repeated, Unexplained, and Still Growing Regulation of State Courts\u27 Criminal Appeals

    Get PDF
    Recently the United States Supreme Court has ruled, in a series of cases beginning with Ornelas v. United States, that decisions of certain mixed questions of federal constitutional law and fact, arising under various amendments, must be reviewed de novo on direct appeal. The Court has not specified that state courts are bound by these rulings, but has used conflicting language relevant to that issue. Faced with this ambiguity, the courts of a number of states have departed from their prior practices by following these rulings, at least some because they consider themselves bound to do so, and have extended the perceived requirement of de novo review far beyond the Court\u27s specific holdings. This Article presents an original challenge to the Supreme Court\u27s power to require state-court de novo review, reminds readers of Professor Meltzer\u27s analogous critique of the Court\u27s power to require states to use the harmless-beyond-a-reasonable-doubt test, as it did in Chapman v. California, and supports the Article\u27s challenge to the Court\u27s recent decisions with an original attack on the Court\u27s power to require state courts to apply new rules of federal constitutional law retroactively to criminal cases pending on direct review, as it did in Griffith v. Kentucky. The Article concludes that for nearly four decades the Supreme Court has failed even to attempt to identify the source of its power to regulate state appellate proceedings in criminal cases in the two established ways and the one nascent way, and calls upon state courts, unless and until the Court expressly holds them bound by the requirement of de novo review, to interpret it as inapplicable to state courts

    Unique critical state single-surface anisotropic hyperplasticity

    Get PDF
    This paper presents the theoretical development and algorithmic implementation of a single surface anisotropic hyperplasticity model. The model extends the isotropic family of models developed by Coombs and Crouch (2011) through (i) intro- ducing anisotropic shearing into the yield surface and (ii) using a more physically realistic pressure sensitive elastic free energy function. This model overcomes the difficulty of determining the constants of the isotropic two-parameter surface by analytically relat- ing them to a single experimentally measurable physical quantity, namely the normalised hydrostatic position of the Critical State. This link results in a unique Critical State surface, invariant of the level of anisotropy inherent in the yield envelope. The model is compared with experimental data on Lower Cromer Till and contrasted against the SANIclay model
    • 

    corecore