3 research outputs found
ΠΠ·Π°ΡΠΌΠΎΠ·Π²'ΡΠ·ΠΎΠΊ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π·ΠΌΡΠ½ ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠ² ΠΏΡΡΠ»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ° (Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ)
Background. Due to the development of industry, increasing number of vehicles on the roads rate of traumatic injuries among adult population causing disability and mortality is still high in all countries of the world. Among all fractures of long bones open diaphyseal fractures ranges from 28% to 53%. Objective. To study the relationship of electrical resistance and morphological features of the femur of white male rats after modeling the open fracture. Methods. Studies were conducted on white male rats aged about 3 months. Digital multimeter UT70B was used to measure the electrical resistance of bones in experimental animals after 1 and 3 hours of experimental modeling of opened bone fracture. Histological and electron microscopic studies were performed to evaluate bone structure. Results. 1 hour after modeling an open bone fracture it was detected the presence of empty lacunae or gaps filled with detritus. 3 hours after the experiment cellular density in the first studied area was reduced 4.1 times, in the second area - 3.2 times comparing with the control. Conclusion. These histological examination and study of the electrical resistance of bone fragments after re-fracture (with or without coagulation fragments) indicate similar changes in direction of the bone. Electrical resistance after testing in the clinical setting can be used for testing the bone fragments after an open fracture to assess viability. We have developed a technique for evaluation the electrical resistance making it possible to predict the viability of bone tissue with opened diaphyseal fractures of extremities on early stages.ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅, ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΌΠΊΠΎΠ² Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π° Π±Π΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ° ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ±Π½Π°ΡΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π³ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π° ΡΡΠ°Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΠ²ΡΠ·Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ UT70B. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΠ°Π½Π½Π΅ΠΌ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅.ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π³ΡΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½Π΅, Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΠΌΡΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΠ° Π²ΠΈΠ²ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ Π²ΡΠ΄Π»Π°ΠΌΠΊΡΠ² ΡΡΠ΅Π³Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΏΡΡΠ»Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΡ ΡΡΠ·Π½ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠΆΠΊΠΎΡΡΡ. ΠΠΈΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π³ΡΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΡΡΠ½Ρ, ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ½Ρ Π·ΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈ Π² ΡΡΡΠΎΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΊΡΠΈΠΌΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΄Π΄ΡΠ»Ρ ΡΠ»Π°ΠΌΠΊΡΠ² ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠΈ. ΠΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠΉΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π²Π·Π°ΡΠΌΠΎΠ·Π²'ΡΠ·ΠΎΠΊ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Ρ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ², Π· Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»Π°Π΄Ρ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ UT70B. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ Π±ΡΡΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠΊΠΎΡΠΈΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΡΡΡΠ·Π΄Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ½ΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΌΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΈΡ
Π΄ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠΊ ΠΊΡΠ½ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΊ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΈΡ
Theoretical and practical problems of optimization the long bone fractures osteosynthesis in patients with varying degrees of trauma severity.
Background. Today the treatment of polytrauma pathologies is complicated by two major problems. Firstly, there is still no universally accepted injury and severity scale for patients with polytrauma, that makes it impossible to develop an objective prognosis and treatment outcomes for victims. Secondary, the universal surgical treatment in patients with long bone fractures in the polytrauma remains indeterminate, the best ways to be agreed stabilization of fractures, depending on the severity of the general condition of patients, location and character of the musculoskeletal system damage. Objective. Justification ways to improve the results of osteosynthesis in patients with multiple and associated fractures of long bones by optimizing treatment strategy based on scoring and severity of injuries. Methods. It was worked out case histories of 226 patients (160 men and 66 women) with combined trauma to determine the optimal scales. To support the optimal volume of osteosynthesis tactics for patients with multiple and associated long bones fractures based on scoring and severity of the injuries, it was analyzed the treatment results of 104 this category patients (75 men and 29 women). All patients were divided into main (43 persons) and the control group (61 persons) on the basis of one-step (main group) or two-step (control group) surgical treatment. Results. Mathematical and statistical analysis of the four most widespread rating and severity scales of the damage in polytrauma, gave the opportunity to determine two the most effective ones in terms of constructive and prognostic validity, informative and ease of use. In order to determine the advantages and disadvantages of one-step and two-step treatment schemes of multiple and associated long bone fractures in patients with injury severity by ISS 25-40 points and severity by VPH-SP 21-32 points, the treatment results were compared by author system of health and social criteria. Conclusion. It is proved that the optimal treatment strategy for victims with multiple and combined fractures of long bones is one-step, including all types of ex-fix osteosynthesis with reposition of bone fragments and closed intramedullary blocked nailing osteosynthesis