Association of kidney disease measures with risk of renal function worsening in patients with type 1 diabetes

Background: Albuminuria has been classically considered a marker of kidney damage progression in diabetic patients and it is routinely assessed to monitor kidney function. However, the role of a mild GFR reduction on the development of stage 653 CKD has been less explored in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the prognostic role of kidney disease measures, namely albuminuria and reduced GFR, on the development of stage 653 CKD in a large cohort of patients affected by T1DM. Methods: A total of 4284 patients affected by T1DM followed-up at 76 diabetes centers participating to the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD) initiative constitutes the study population. Urinary albumin excretion (ACR) and estimated GFR (eGFR) were retrieved and analyzed. The incidence of stage 653 CKD (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) or eGFR reduction > 30% from baseline was evaluated. Results: The mean estimated GFR was 98 \ub1 17 mL/min/1.73m2 and the proportion of patients with albuminuria was 15.3% (n = 654) at baseline. About 8% (n = 337) of patients developed one of the two renal endpoints during the 4-year follow-up period. Age, albuminuria (micro or macro) and baseline eGFR < 90 ml/min/m2 were independent risk factors for stage 653 CKD and renal function worsening. When compared to patients with eGFR > 90 ml/min/1.73m2 and normoalbuminuria, those with albuminuria at baseline had a 1.69 greater risk of reaching stage 3 CKD, while patients with mild eGFR reduction (i.e. eGFR between 90 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) show a 3.81 greater risk that rose to 8.24 for those patients with albuminuria and mild eGFR reduction at baseline. Conclusions: Albuminuria and eGFR reduction represent independent risk factors for incident stage 653 CKD in T1DM patients. The simultaneous occurrence of reduced eGFR and albuminuria have a synergistic effect on renal function worsening

Randomized trial comparing nicotinamide and nicotinamide plus cyclosporin in recent onset insulin-dependent diabetes (IMDIAB 1). The IMDIAB Study Group

A 1-year open randomized controlled multicentre trial was carried out on 90 patients with recent onset (< 4 weeks) insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) to compare the effect of nicotinamide (NCT) with the combination NCT and low dose cyclosporin (CyA) on clinical remission and optimization of metabolic control during the first year from diagnosis. Three groups of patients were randomly assigned to receive for 12 months either NCT 25 mg kg-1 day-1 (n = 30) or NCT 25 mg kg-1 day-1 + CyA 5 mg kg-1 day-1 (n = 30), the latter adjusted to maintain 12 whole blood trough levels of 83 nmol l-1; a third group of patients (n = 30) receiving insulin only acted as a control group for spontaneous remission and metabolic control. Clinical remission (i.e. suspension of insulin therapy with normal metabolic parameters for more than 2 weeks according to the International Diabetes Immunotherapy Group) was achieved at 3 months in 6/30 NCT treated patients and in 1/30 NCT + CyA treated patient (p = 0.05); no remission was observed in control patients. At 6 months the number of patients achieving remission in each group was 4/29, 3/27, and 1/29, respectively (p = NS). One year after diagnosis 4/27 NCT treated, 2/25 NCT+CyA treated but 0/28 of the control patients were in remission (NCT vs control p = 0.05). Clinical remission lasted longer (7 +/- 3 SD months) in NCT treated patients than in NCT+CyA treated or control patients (p < 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS

Combination of nicotinamide and steroid versus nicotinamide in recent-onset IDDM: The IMDIAB II study

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of nicotinamide (NCT) alone or in combination with a cortisone-like substance, deflazacort (DFL), on the integrated parameters of metabolic control in patients with the recent-onset of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients who were diagnosed with diabetes between 5 and 35 years of age entered a randomized, double-blind, 1-year prospective study. Group A (n = 18) received NCT for 1 year (25 mg.kg-1.day-1) plus DFL for 3 months (0.6 mg.kg-1.day-1 in the first month, 0.3 mg.kg-1.day-1 in the other 2 months). Group B (n = 18) received NCT for 1 year (25 mg.kg-1.day-1) plus placebo for the first 3 months. All patients were treated with intensified insulin therapy. RESULTS: At 3 months after diagnosis, the insulin dose was significantly higher in group A compared with group B (P < 0.03) with similar HbA1 levels. Basal and stimulated C-peptide levels in group A of both adults and children were significantly higher compared with patients of group B (P < 0.05 and P < 0.03, respectively). At the end of a 1-year follow-up, basal C-peptide did not differ between the two groups, although stimulated C-peptide was still significantly higher in patients of group A compared with group B (P < 0.05). Finally, insulin requirement did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term course of DFL therapy at diagnosis in addition to NCT slightly increases glucagon-stimulated but not basal beta-cell function after 1 year

DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF NICOTINAMIDE IN RECENT-ONSET IDDM (THE IMDIAB-III STUDY)

Nicotinamide has been recently introduced, in addition to intensive insulin therapy for patients with recent-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) to protect beta cells from endstage destruction. However, available data are conflicting. A double blind trial in 56 newly-diagnosed IDDM patients receiving nicotinamide for 12 months at a dose of 25 mg/kg body weight or placebo was designed in order to determine whether this treatment could improve the integrated parameters of metabolic control (insulin dose, glycated haemoglobin and C-peptide secretion) in the year after diagnosis. In addition to nicotinamide or placebo, patients received three to four insulin injections daily to optimize blood glucose levels. Patients treated with nicotinamide or placebo received similar doses of insulin during follow-up and 1 year after diagnosis with comparable glycated haemoglobin levels (6.7 +/- 1.8 % nicotinamide vs 7.1 +/- 0.6 % placebo). Basal and glucagon stimulated C-peptide secretion detectable at diagnosis were similarly preserved in the course of 12 months follow-up both in nicotinamide and placebo treated patients. No adverse effects were observed in patients receiving nicotinamide. When age at diagnosis was taken into account, nicotinamide treated older patients (&gt; 15 years of age) showed significantly higher stimulated C-peptide secretion than placebo treated patients (p &lt; 0.02). These results suggest that nicotinamide can preserve and improve stimulated beta-cell function only in patients diagnosed after puberty. We conclude that in these patients nicotinamide can be added to insulin at the time of disease diagnosis to maintain and possibly improve residual beta-cell function. However, further studies on patients diagnosed after puberty are needed to confirm whether nicotinamide can be considered an additional tool to insulin in early-onset IDDM

Adjuvant therapy in recent onset type 1 diabetes at diagnosis and insulin requirement after 2 years

Partial recovery of β-cell function in type 1 diabetes is common after diagnosis by intensive insulin therapy. Residual β-cell function can be improved by other therapies. Cyclosporin (CyA) and nicotinamide (NA), alone or in combination, can preserve this function, as indicated by the parameters of metabolic control (insulin dose, HbA1C). After suspension of CyA, insulin requirement returns to control values, suggesting loss of residual β-cell function. The effects induced by withdrawal of NA after 1 year are not known. For the first time, we studied 27 type 1 diabetes patients treated with NA for 12 months and then followed up for 1 year after discontinuance of NA. Another 25 patients treated with NA + CyA and 28 control patients were followed up similarly. Insulin requirement doubled 12 months after discontinuance of NA or NA + CyA, becoming identical to that of controls. As patients showed HbA1C values similar to control subjects, it is likely that β-cell function deteriorated after discontinuance of therapy. As NA is safer than other agents and its effects are beneficial, longer studies are warranted to investigate NA in prolonged treatments since this compound is also being considered for prevention of type 1 diabetes