4 research outputs found
Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption to fluconazole with positive patch testing and confirmed tolerance to itraconazole
Generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE) is a specific variant of fixed drug eruption that belongs to severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) and its diagnosis is based mainly on clinical course and especially on the reoccurrence of typical bullous lesions in previous and new sites after re-administration of the offending drug. We present a well-documented case of fluconazole-induced GBFDE, with a positive patch test to fluconazole (30% weight/volume preparation) and clinical tolerance to itraconazole proven by negative oral provocation. Even in SCARs, patch testing represents a useful diagnostic tool, while oral provocation remains the gold standard in cases that an alternative but the chemically relevant drug must be administered. Copyright © 2021 Makris et al
Diagnostic value of a semi-nested PCR for the diagnosis of mucormycosis and aspergillosis from paraffin-embedded tissue: A single center experience
Objective: The main aim of our study was to investigate the diagnostic value of a molecular method for the diagnosis of mucormycosis and aspergillosis from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified all cases with histology reports mentioning the presence of fungi with morphological characteristics of either Aspergillus or mucormycetes, for the period 2005-2012. Paraffin blocks were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology. A semi-nested PCR specific for the detection of mucormycetes and Aspergillus species was applied in FFPE tissue from the above blocks. Results were compared with those of histological (gold standard) and microbiological methods. Results: Twenty cases with fungal hyphae in tissue were revealed. Mucormycetes were detected in 9 cases (45%) by PCR, in only 4 of which culture was available. Species of Aspergillus were detected in 8 cases (40%) by PCR, two of which were co-infection with mucormycetes. Five patients had other fungi, non-detectable with this specific PCR. At least one sample per patient was positive by PCR. Seven out of 30 samples tested overall were false negative. The calculated sensitivity of this method in our setting was 79.3% (95% CI: 60.3-91.9%); specificity was 100%. Conclusions: The specific PCR used appears to be an easy and useful tool for the prompt and accurate diagnosis of mucormycosis and aspergillosis, in combination with histology and direct examination. Mucormycosis was more frequent than aspergillosis during the study period, highlighting the importance of continuous epidemiological surveillance of these serious infections. © 2016 Elsevier GmbH