Effects of semaglutide on stroke subtypes in type 2 diabetes: post hoc analysis of the randomised SUSTAIN 6 & PIONEER 6

This is the final version. Available on open access from Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins via the DOI in this record Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, including semaglutide, may reduce stroke risk in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This post hoc analysis examined the subcutaneous and oral semaglutide effects, versus placebo, on stroke and its subtypes in people with T2D at high cardiovascular (CV) risk. Methods: SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 were randomised CV outcome trials of subcutaneous and oral semaglutide in people with T2D at high CV risk, respectively. Time to first stroke and stroke subtypes were analysed using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by trial with pooled treatment as a factor. The impact of prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction or stroke, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and prior atrial fibrillation on treatment effects was assessed using interaction p-values. Risk of major adverse CV event (MACE) was analysed according to prior stroke. Results: 106/6480 participants had a stroke (1.0 event/100 patient-years of observation [PYO]). Semaglutide reduced incidence of any stroke versus placebo (0.8 vs 1.1 events/100 PYO; HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.46–1.00;p=0.048), driven by significant reductions in risk of small-vessel occlusion (0.3 vs 0.7 events/100 PYO; HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.29–0.89;p=0.017). HRs for risk of any stroke with semaglutide versus placebo were 0.60 (95%CI 0.37–0.99; 0.5 vs 0.9 events/100 PYO) and 0.89 (95%CI 0.47–1.69; 2.7 vs 3.0 events/100 PYO) in those without and with prior stroke, respectively. Except for prior atrial fibrillation (pinteraction=0.025), no significant interactions were observed between treatment effects on risk of any stroke and subgroups investigated, or between treatment effects on risk of MACE and prior stroke (pinteraction>0.05 for all). Conclusions: Semaglutide reduced incidence of any first stroke during the trials versus placebo in people with T2D at high CV risk, primarily driven by small-vessel occlusion prevention. Semaglutide treatment, versus placebo, lowered the risk of stroke irrespective of prior stroke at baseline. Clinical Trial Registration Information: SUSTAIN 6: NCT01720446 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01720446); PIONEER 6: NCT02692716 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02692716).Novo Nordisk A/S (Søborg, Denmark

Impact of microvascular disease on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Results from the LEADER and SUSTAIN 6 clinical trials

The randomized, double-blind, cardiovascular outcomes trials LEADER (NCT01179048) and SUSTAIN 6 (NCT01720446) showed cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide and semaglutide, respectively, compared with placebo. This post hoc analysis examined the impact of microvascular disease at baseline on cardiovascular outcomes in these trials, and the efficacy of liraglutide (1.8 mg) and once-weekly semaglutide (0.5-1.0 mg) in patients with and without microvascular disease. In total, 9340 patients from LEADER and 3297 patients from SUSTAIN 6 were included in this analysis; of these, 5761 and 2356 had a history of microvascular disease at baseline and 3835 and 1640 had a history of both microvascular and macrovascular disease, respectively. Patients with microvascular disease were shown to have an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with patients without microvascular disease (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] in LEADER: 1.15 [1.03; 1.29], P =.0136; SUSTAIN 6: 1.56 [1.14; 2.17], P =.0064). Liraglutide and semaglutide consistently reduced cardiovascular risk in patients with and without microvascular disease

Feasibility of Prehospital Teleconsultation in Acute Stroke – A Pilot Study in Clinical Routine

BACKGROUND: Inter-hospital teleconsultation improves stroke care. To transfer this concept into the emergency medical service (EMS), the feasibility and effects of prehospital teleconsultation were investigated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Teleconsultation enabling audio communication, real-time video streaming, vital data and still picture transmission was conducted between an ambulance and a teleconsultation center. Pre-notification of the hospital was carried out with a 14-item stroke history checklist via e-mail-to-fax. Beside technical assessments possible influences on prehospital and initial in-hospital time intervals, prehospital diagnostic accuracy and the transfer of stroke specific data were investigated by comparing telemedically assisted prehospital care (telemedicine group) with local regular EMS care (control group). All prehospital stroke patients over a 5-month period were included during weekdays (7.30 a.m.-4.00 p.m.). In 3 of 18 missions partial dropouts of the system occurred; neurological co-evaluation via video transmission was conducted in 12 cases. The stroke checklist was transmitted in 14 cases (78%). Telemedicine group (n = 18) vs. control group (n = 47): Prehospital time intervals were comparable, but in both groups the door to brain imaging times were longer than recommended (median 59.5 vs. 57.5 min, p = 0.6447). The prehospital stroke diagnosis was confirmed in 61% vs. 67%, p = 0.8451. Medians of 14 (IQR 9) vs. 5 (IQR 2) stroke specific items were transferred in written form to the in-hospital setting, p<0.0001. In 3 of 10 vs. 5 of 27 patients with cerebral ischemia thrombolytics were administered, p = 0.655. CONCLUSIONS: Teleconsultation was feasible but technical performance and reliability have to be improved. The approach led to better stroke specific information; however, a superiority over regular EMS care was not found and in-hospital time intervals were unacceptably long in both groups. The feasibility of prehospital tele-stroke consultation has future potential to improve emergency care especially when no highly trained personnel are on-scene. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN) ISRCTN83270177

Automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs versus cardiologists' triage decision making based on teletransmitted data in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome

The aims of this study were to assess the effectiveness of 2 automated electrocardiogram interpretation programs in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome transported to hospital by ambulance in 1 rural region of Denmark with hospital discharge diagnosis used as the gold standard and to assess the effectiveness of cardiologists' triage decisions for these patients based on initial electrocardiogram. Twelve-lead electrocardiograms were recorded in ambulances using a LIFEPAK 12 monitor/defibrillator (Physio-Control, Inc., Redmond, Washington) and transmitted digitally to an attending cardiologist. If a diagnosis of ST elevation myocardial infarction was made, a patient was taken to a regional interventional center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention or to a local hospital. One thousand consecutive digital electrocardiograms and corresponding interpretations from LIFEPAK 12 were available, and these were subsequently interpreted by the University of Glasgow program. Electrocardiogram interpretations and cardiologists' decisions were compared to hospital discharge diagnoses. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values for a report of ST elevation myocardial infarction with respect to discharge diagnosis were 78%, 91%, and 81% for LIFEPAK 12 and 78%, 94%, and 87% for the Glasgow program. Corresponding data for attending cardiologists were 85%, 90%, and 81%. In conclusion, the Glasgow program had significantly higher specificity than the LIFEPAK 12 program (p = 0.02) and the cardiologists (p = 0.004). Triage decisions were effective, with good agreement between cardiologists' decisions and discharge diagnoses. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2010;106:1696-1702