Monoterpenes support systemic acquired resistance within and between plants.

This study investigates the role of volatile organic compounds in systemic acquired resistance (SAR), a salicylic acid (SA)-associated, broad-spectrum immune response in systemic, healthy tissues of locally infected plants. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry analyses of SAR-related emissions of wild-type and non-SAR-signal-producing mutant plants associated SAR with monoterpene emissions. Headspace exposure of Arabidopsis thaliana to a mixture of the bicyclic monoterpenes α-pinene and β-pinene induced defense, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and expression of SA- and SAR-related genes, including the SAR regulatory AZELAIC ACID INDUCED1 (AZI1) gene and three of its paralogs. Pinene-induced resistance was dependent on SA biosynthesis and signaling and on AZI1. A. thaliana geranylgeranyl reductase1 mutants with reduced monoterpene biosynthesis were SAR-defective but mounted normal local resistance and methyl salicylate-induced defense responses, suggesting that monoterpenes act in parallel with SA. The volatile emissions from SAR signal-emitting plants induced defense in neighboring plants and this was associated with the presence of α-pinene, β-pinene, and camphene in the emissions of the 'sender' plants. Our data suggest that monoterpenes, particularly pinenes, promote SAR, acting through ROS and AZI1, and likely function as infochemicals in plant-to-plant signaling, thus allowing defense signal propagation between neighboring plants

Roles of plant volatiles in defence against microbial pathogens and microbial exploitation of volatiles

Plants emit a large variety of volatile organic compounds during infection by pathogenic microbes, including terpenes, aromatics, nitrogen‐containing compounds, and fatty acid derivatives, as well as the volatile plant hormones, methyl jasmonate, and methyl salicylate. Given the general antimicrobial activity of plant volatiles and the timing of emission following infection, these compounds have often been assumed to function in defence against pathogens without much solid evidence. In this review, we critically evaluate current knowledge on the toxicity of volatiles to fungi, bacteria, and viruses and their role in plant resistance as well as how they act to induce systemic resistance in uninfected parts of the plant and in neighbouring plants. We also discuss how microbes can detoxify plant volatiles and exploit them as nutrients, attractants for insect vectors, and inducers of volatile emissions, which stimulate immune responses that make plants more susceptible to infection. Although much more is known about plant volatile–herbivore interactions, knowledge of volatile–microbe interactions is growing and it may eventually be possible to harness plant volatiles to reduce disease in agriculture and forestry. Future research in this field can be facilitated by making use of the analytical and molecular tools generated by the prolific research on plant–herbivore interactions.A. H. and T. A. are funded by South African National Research Council Incentive Funds (2019) and the University of Pretoria, and J. G. is funded by the Max Planck Society.https://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pce2020-10-01hj2020BiochemistryForestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI)GeneticsMicrobiology and Plant PathologyZoology and Entomolog

How plants might recognize rhizospheric bacterial volatiles

In contrast to animals, plants possess neither olfactory organs nor a central nervous system. However, they do perceive and systemically react to volatile stimuli. Such function serves in monitoring the immediate and remote environments and translates into optimized responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. While the ecological relevance of volatile-mediated plant–plant and plant–insect interactions is today unquestioned, both above- and below-ground plant–microbe communication through VOCs has only gained attention recently. The common metabolic origins that yield the vast chemical diversity of plant and microbes allow for a substantial overlap between plant and microbial volatile species. Hence, it remains unclear if plants recognize and/or distinguish plant-like from foreign cues. The identities of the cellular components ensuring such recognition are even more obscure. Easy-to-score plant outputs in response to microbial VOCs elicitation, like plant growth promotion and innate immunity stimulation, will be instrumental to pinpointing VOCs-sensing proteins. Several major phytohormones have a gaseous nature and dedicated perception machineries that could serve as a basis to envisage how volatile semiochemicals might be sensed by plants. If volatile-mediated communication represents an ancestral cellular feature, VOCs perception and signalling might rely on basal protein families and define a universal chemical language