19 research outputs found

    Continuity of care and health care cost among community‐dwelling older adult veterans living with dementia

    No full text
    ObjectivesTo estimate the causal impact of continuity of care (COC) on total, institutional, and noninstitutional cost among community‐dwelling older veterans with dementia.Data SourcesCombined Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare data in Fiscal Years (FYs) 2014‐2015.Study DesignFY 2014 COC was measured by the Bice‐Boxerman Continuity of Care (BBC) index on a 0‐1 scale. FY 2015 total combined VHA and Medicare cost, institutional cost of acute inpatient, emergency department [ED], long‐/short‐stay nursing home, and noninstitutional long‐term care (LTC) cost for medical (like skilled‐) and social (like unskilled‐) services were assessed controlling for covariates. An instrumental variable for COC (change of residence by more than 10 miles) was used to account for unobserved health confounders.Data CollectionCommunity‐dwelling veterans with dementia aged 66 and older, enrolled in Traditional Medicare (N = 102 073).Principal FindingsMean BBC in FY 2014 was 0.32; mean total cost in FY 2015 was 35 425.A0.1higherBBCresultedin(a)35 425. A 0.1 higher BBC resulted in (a) 4045 lower total cost; (b) 1597loweracuteinpatientcost,1597 lower acute inpatient cost, 119 lower ED cost, 4368lowerlong‐staynursinghomecost;(c)4368 lower long‐stay nursing home cost; (c) 402 higher noninstitutional medical LTC and $764 higher noninstitutional social LTC cost. BBC had no impact on short‐stay nursing home cost.ConclusionsCOC is an effective approach to reducing total health care cost by supporting noninstitutional care and reducing institutional care.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167831/1/hesr13541.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167831/2/hesr13541-sup-0001-Authormatrix.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/167831/3/hesr13541_am.pd

    Continuity of care and general wellbeing of patients with comorbidities requiring joint replacement

    Get PDF
    Aim. The aim of this paper is to examine the continuity of care and general wellbeing of patients with comorbidities undergoing elective total hip or knee joint replacement.Background. Advances in medical science and improved lifestyles have reduced mortality rates in most Western countries. As a result, there is an ageing population with a concomitant growth in the number of people who are living with multiple chronic illnesses, commonly referred to as comorbidities. These patients often require acute care services, creating a blend of acute and chronic illness needs. For example, joint replacement surgery is frequently performed to improve impaired mobility associated with osteoarthritis.Method. A purposive sample of twenty participants with multiple comorbidities who required joint replacement surgery was recruited to obtain survey, interview and medical record audit data. Data were collected during 2004 and 2005.Findings. Comorbidity care was poorly co-ordinated prior to having surgery, during the acute care stay and following surgery and primarily entailed prescribed medicines. The main focus in acute care was patient throughput following joint replacement surgery according to a prescribed clinical pathway. General wellbeing was less than optimal: participants reported pain, fatigue, insomnia and alterations in urinary elimination as the chief sources of discomfort during the course of the study.Conclusion. Continuity of care of comorbidities was lacking. Comorbidities affected patient general wellbeing and delayed recovery from surgery. Acute care, clinical pathways and the specialisation of medicine and nursing subordinated the general problem of patients with comorbidities. Systems designed to integrate and co-ordinate chronic illness care had limited application in the acute care setting. A multidisciplinary, holistic approach is required. Recommendations for further research conclude this paper.<br /
    corecore