9 research outputs found

    The effect of secondary inorganic aerosols, soot and the geographical origin of air mass on acute myocardial infarction hospitalisations in Gothenburg, Sweden during 1985 - 2010 : a case-crossover study

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The relative importance of different sources of air pollution for cardiovascular disease is unclear. The aims were to compare the associations between acute myocardial infarction (AMI) hospitalisations in Gothenburg, Sweden and 1) the long-range transported (LRT) particle fraction, 2) the remaining particle fraction, 3) geographical air mass origin, and 4) influence of local dispersion during 1985–2010. METHODS : A case-crossover design was applied using lag0 (the exposure the same day as hospitalisation), lag1 (exposure one day prior hospitalisation) and 2-day cumulative average exposure (CA2) (mean of lag0 and lag1). The LRT fractions included PMion (sum of sulphate, nitrate and ammonium) and soot measured at a rural site. The difference between urban PM10 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10 ÎŒm) and rural PMion was a proxy for locally generated PM10 (PMrest). The daily geographical origin of air mass was estimated as well as days with limited or effective local dispersion. The entire year was considered, as well as warm and cold periods, and different time periods. RESULTS : In total 28 215 AMI hospitalisations occurred during 26 years. PM10, PMion, PMrest and soot did not influence AMI for the entire year. In the cold period, the association was somewhat stronger for PMrest than for urban PM10; the strongest associations were observed during 1990–2000 between AMI and CA2 of PMrest (6.6% per inter-quartile range (IQR), 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 11.4%) and PM10 (4.1%, 95% CI 0.2% − 8.2%). Regarding the geographical air mass origins there were few associations. Days with limited local dispersion showed an association with AMI in the cold period of 2001–2010 (6.7%, 95% CI 0.0% − 13.0%). CONCLUSIONS : In the cold period, locally generated PM and days with limited local dispersion affected AMI hospitalisations, indicating importance of local emissions from e.g. traffic.The Swedish Research Council Formas funded the study.http://www.ehjournal.netam201

    Climate impact on contaminant dispersion in the river basin of Göta Älv, Sweden

    No full text
    This study is the result of the DiPol project (Impact of climate change on the quality of urban and coastal waters) that was conducted 2009-2012 as part of the EU Interreg IVB North Sea Program. The overall aim with DiPol was to gather knowledge regarding how climate changes affect water quality. Additionally, to communicate such knowledge and increase awareness about climate changes among decision makers to be able to counteract the effects of climate changes both on the local and regional levels as well as to involve the general public in this work. Four study sites were choosen in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Germany. This report covers the results from the Swedish study site; the river basin of Göta Älv. Based on samples from wet and dry periods as well as spring flood events, this study presents a possible relation between a short term increase in precipitation and enhanced contaminant transport in urban water courses of the Göta Älv river basin in Sweden. Elevated metal and PAH concentrations (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) in the studied river system was linked to increased surface runoffs and shallow groundwater flows from urban areas, rather than re-suspension of river sediments. Based on future prediction of precipitation, also the climate change impact on ground water levels and river discharge are shown together with other consequences such as contaminant transport in rivers of this region. This study demonstrates an enhanced contaminant transport from urban areas to the river system due to increased precipitation and ground water levels

    Stakeholder involvement for management of the coastal zone

    No full text
    The European Union (EU) has taken the lead to promote the management of coastal systems. Management strategies are implemented by the Water Framework Directive (WFD) and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), as well as the recent Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) Directive. Most EU directives have a strong focus on public participation; however, a recent review found that the actual involvement of stakeholders was variable. The “Architecture and roadmap to manage multiple pressures on lagoons” (ARCH) research project has developed and implemented participative methodologies at different case study sites throughout Europe. These cases represent a broad range of coastal systems, and they highlight different legislative frameworks that are relevant for coastal zone management. Stakeholder participation processes were subsequently evaluated at 3 case study sites in order to assess the actual implementation of participation in the context of their respective legislative frameworks: 1) Byfjorden in Bergen, Norway, in the context of the WFD; 2) Amvrakikos Gulf, Greece, in the context of the MSFD; and 3) Nordre Älv Estuary, Sweden, in the context of the MSP Directive. An overall assessment of the evaluation criteria indicates that the ARCH workshop series methodology of focusing first on the current status of the lagoon or estuary, then on future challenges, and finally on identifying management solutions provided a platform that was conducive for stakeholder participation. Results suggest that key criteria for a good participatory process were present and above average at the 3 case study sites. The results also indicate that the active engagement that was initiated at the 3 case study sites has led to capacity building among the participants, which is an important intermediary outcome of public participation. A strong connection between participatory processes and policy can ensure the legacy of the intermediary outcomes, which is an important and necessary start toward more permanent resource management outcomes such as ecological and economic improvement. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2016;12:701–710. © 2016 SETAC. © 2016 SETA
    corecore