12 research outputs found

    Effects of low power laser irradiation on bone healing in animals: a meta-analysis

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose</p> <p>The meta-analysis was performed to identify animal research defining the effects of low power laser irradiation on biomechanical indicators of bone regeneration and the impact of dosage.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We searched five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database of Randomised Clinical Trials) for studies in the area of laser and bone healing published from 1966 to October 2008. Included studies had to investigate fracture healing in any animal model, using any type of low power laser irradiation, and use at least one quantitative biomechanical measures of bone strength. There were 880 abstracts related to the laser irradiation and bone issues (healing, surgery and assessment). Five studies met our inclusion criteria and were critically appraised by two raters independently using a structured tool designed for rating the quality of animal research studies. After full text review, two articles were deemed ineligible for meta-analysis because of the type of injury method and biomechanical variables used, leaving three studies for meta-analysis. Maximum bone tolerance force before the point of fracture during the biomechanical test, 4 weeks after bone deficiency was our main biomechanical bone properties for the Meta analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Studies indicate that low power laser irradiation can enhance biomechanical properties of bone during fracture healing in animal models. Maximum bone tolerance was statistically improved following low level laser irradiation (average random effect size 0.726, 95% CI 0.08 - 1.37, p 0.028). While conclusions are limited by the low number of studies, there is concordance across limited evidence that laser improves the strength of bone tissue during the healing process in animal models.</p

    Osteopontin and bone repair in rabbit tibial defect

    No full text
    Human osteopontin (OPN) was produced by a recombinant technique. A circular defect was created in each tibia of 30 adult rabbits. The animals were divided in six equal groups. Four animals of each group were randomly chosen as experimental group in which OPN coated hydroxyapatite granules (OPN-HA) and non-coated hydroxyapatite (HA) granules were inserted alternatively in created defects. One animal of each group was used as control animal to observe the spontaneous healing process of the defects. The created defects in these animals did not receive any implants. The animals were sacrificed after 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 and 30 weeks. The histological sections were magnified and scanned digitally. In the first measurement, the total amount of bone formation in the entire defect was calculated. In a second measurement, new bone formation was quantified at the edges and at the centre of the defects. The total amount of bone formation in OPN treated defects was significantly higher, whereas no significant difference of bone formation was observed at the edges or at the centre of the defects. A careful interpretation of these results suggests that human OPN might stimulate bone formation in the rabbit tibia

    Osteopontin and bone metabolism in healing cranial defects in rabbits

    No full text
    Non-collagen proteins such as bone sialoprotein and osteopontin (OPN) form 10% of the extracellular bone matrix. In this study, the influence of OPN on bone repair was investigated. Human OPN (Innogenetics) was produced by a recombinant technique and bonded onto the surface of hydroxyapatite (Interpore 200). Thirty rabbits were divided into six equal groups. A circular defect (10mm) was prepared in each parietal bone. In four rabbits of each group the left and right defects were filled with either OPN-coated hydroxyapatite (OPN-HA) or non-coated hydroxyapatite (HA). One sham animal of each group received no implants. The animals were killed after 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 and 30 weeks. The histological sections were scanned and analysed digitally. There were no statistically significant differences in total bone formation between defects filled with OPN-HA and HA. Bone formation at the borders of the healing area was significantly higher in defects filled with OPN-HA than in those filled with HA. Less bone formation was noted in the OPN-HA and HA groups at the centre of the healing area than at the borders of the healing area and the dural area. Although some animals in the sham group showed a high level of bone formation in the dural area, this was not significantly different to that in the dural area of the other groups. There was no sign of infection or tissue rejection of the graf

    Digital measurements: a different approach to evaluate bone formation. A technical report

    No full text
    In this study a digital measurement technique has been proposed to quantify bone formation on histological images. Two standard parietal defects were created in 30 adult rabbits. The animals were divided into six groups. Four animals of each group were randomly chosen as experimental group in which osteopontin-coated hydroxyapatite (OPN-HA) and hydroxyapatite (HA) were inserted alternatively in created defects. To observe the spontaneous healing process of defects, one animal of each group was used as control animal and these created defects did not receive any implants. The animals were sacrificed after 1, 2, 6, 12, 18 and 30 weeks. The histological sections were magnified (x100) and scanned digitally. The newly formed bone surfaces within the healing area were indicated and quantified by means of Adobe Photoshop 7 software. This measuring technique was found to be reliable and reproducible. The results of this study show no significant differences in bone formation between the OPN-HA and non-coated HA defects, although a significant difference in bone formation was measured at the margins of the defects treated with OPN-H
    corecore