Systems and algorithms for wireless sensor networks based on animal and natural behavior

In last decade, there have been many research works about wireless sensor networks (WSNs) focused on improving the network performance as well as increasing the energy efficiency and communications effectiveness. Many of these new mechanisms have been implemented using the behaviors of certain animals, such as ants, bees, or schools of fish.These systems are called bioinspired systems and are used to improve aspects such as handling large-scale networks, provide dynamic nature, and avoid resource constraints, heterogeneity, unattended operation, or robustness, amongmanyothers.Therefore, thispaper aims to studybioinspired mechanisms in the field ofWSN, providing the concepts of these behavior patterns in which these new approaches are based. The paper will explain existing bioinspired systems in WSNs and analyze their impact on WSNs and their evolution. In addition, we will conduct a comprehensive review of recently proposed bioinspired systems, protocols, and mechanisms. Finally, this paper will try to analyze the applications of each bioinspired mechanism as a function of the imitated animal and the deployed application. Although this research area is considered an area with highly theoretical content, we intend to show the great impact that it is generating from the practical perspective.Sendra, S.; Parra Boronat, L.; Lloret, J.; Khan, S. (2015). Systems and algorithms for wireless sensor networks based on animal and natural behavior. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks. 2015:1-19. doi:10.1155/2015/625972S1192015Iram, R., Sheikh, M. I., Jabbar, S., & Minhas, A. A. (2011). Computational intelligence based optimization in wireless sensor network. 2011 International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies. doi:10.1109/icict.2011.5983561Lloret, J., Bosch, I., Sendra, S., & Serrano, A. (2011). A Wireless Sensor Network for Vineyard Monitoring That Uses Image Processing. Sensors, 11(6), 6165-6196. doi:10.3390/s110606165Lloret, J., Garcia, M., Bri, D., & Sendra, S. (2009). A Wireless Sensor Network Deployment for Rural and Forest Fire Detection and Verification. Sensors, 9(11), 8722-8747. doi:10.3390/s91108722Dasgupta, P. (2008). A Multiagent Swarming System for Distributed Automatic Target Recognition Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 38(3), 549-563. doi:10.1109/tsmca.2008.918619Quwaider, M., & Biswas, S. (2012). Delay Tolerant Routing Protocol Modeling for Low Power Wearable Wireless Sensor Networks. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 4(3). doi:10.5296/npa.v4i3.2054Sendra, S., Lloret, J., Garcia, M., & Toledo, J. F. (2011). Power Saving and Energy Optimization Techniques for Wireless Sensor Neworks (Invited Paper). Journal of Communications, 6(6). doi:10.4304/jcm.6.6.439-459Liu, M., & Song, C. (2012). Ant-Based Transmission Range Assignment Scheme for Energy Hole Problem in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 8(12), 290717. doi:10.1155/2012/290717Riva, G., & Finochietto, J. M. (2012). Pheromone-based In-Network Processing for Wireless Sensor Network Monitoring Systems. Network Protocols and Algorithms, 4(4). doi:10.5296/npa.v4i4.2206Garcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, J., & Canovas, A. (2011). Saving energy and improving communications using cooperative group-based Wireless Sensor Networks. Telecommunication Systems, 52(4), 2489-2502. doi:10.1007/s11235-011-9568-3Kim, J.-Y., Sharma, T., Kumar, B., Tomar, G. S., Berry, K., & Lee, W.-H. (2014). Intercluster Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Network in Dense Environment. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 10(4), 457402. doi:10.1155/2014/457402Dressler, F., & Akan, O. B. (2010). A survey on bio-inspired networking. Computer Networks, 54(6), 881-900. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2009.10.024Atakan, B., & Akan, O. B. (2006). Immune System Based Distributed Node and Rate Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2006 1st Bio-Inspired Models of Network, Information and Computing Systems. doi:10.1109/bimnics.2006.361806Di Pietro, R., & Verde, N. V. (2011). Introducing epidemic models for data survivability in Unattended Wireless Sensor Networks. 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks. doi:10.1109/wowmom.2011.5986165Marwaha, S., Indulska, J., & Portmann, M. (2009). Biologically Inspired Ant-Based Routing in Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET): A Survey. 2009 Symposia and Workshops on Ubiquitous, Autonomic and Trusted Computing. doi:10.1109/uic-atc.2009.95Jha, V., Khetarpal, K., & Sharma, M. (2011). A survey of nature inspired routing algorithms for MANETs. 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology. doi:10.1109/icectech.2011.5942042Fernandez-Marquez, J. L., Di Marzo Serugendo, G., Montagna, S., Viroli, M., & Arcos, J. L. (2012). Description and composition of bio-inspired design patterns: a complete overview. Natural Computing, 12(1), 43-67. doi:10.1007/s11047-012-9324-yCamilo, T., Carreto, C., Silva, J. S., & Boavida, F. (2006). An Energy-Efficient Ant-Based Routing Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 49-59. doi:10.1007/11839088_5Selvakennedy, S., Sinnappan, S., & Shang, Y. (2006). T-ANT: A Nature-Inspired Data Gathering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Communications, 1(2). doi:10.4304/jcm.1.2.22-29Almshreqi, A. M. S., Ali, B. M., Rasid, M. F. A., Ismail, A., & Varahram, P. (2012). An improved routing mechanism using bio-inspired for energy balancing in wireless sensor networks. The International Conference on Information Network 2012. doi:10.1109/icoin.2012.6164367Chen, G., Guo, T.-D., Yang, W.-G., & Zhao, T. (2006). An improved ant-based routing protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing. doi:10.1109/colcom.2006.361893Okdem, S., & Karaboga, D. (2006). Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Ant Colony Optimization. First NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems (AHS’06). doi:10.1109/ahs.2006.63Salehpour, A.-A., Mirmobin, B., Afzali-Kusha, A., & Mohammadi, S. (2008). An energy efficient routing protocol for cluster-based wireless sensor networks using ant colony optimization. 2008 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology. doi:10.1109/innovations.2008.4781748Wen, Y., Chen, Y., & Pan, M. (2008). Adaptive ant-based routing in wireless sensor networks using Energy*Delay metrics. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 9(4), 531-538. doi:10.1631/jzus.a071382Liao, W.-H., Kao, Y., & Wu, R.-T. (2011). Ant colony optimization based sensor deployment protocol for wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6599-6605. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.079Pavai, K., Sivagami, A., & Sridharan, D. (2009). Study of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2009 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies. doi:10.1109/act.2009.133Juan, L., Chen, S., & Chao, Z. (2007). Ant System Based Anycast Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. doi:10.1109/wicom.2007.603Wang, C., & Lin, Q. (2008). Swarm intelligence optimization based routing algorithm for Wireless Sensor Networks. 2008 International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing. doi:10.1109/icnnsp.2008.4590326Jiang, H., Wang, M., Liu, M., & Yan, J. (2012). A quantum-inspired ant-based routing algorithm for WSNs. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD). doi:10.1109/cscwd.2012.6221881Okazaki, A. M., & Frohlich, A. A. (2011). Ant-based Dynamic Hop Optimization Protocol: A routing algorithm for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks. 2011 IEEE GLOBECOM Workshops (GC Wkshps). doi:10.1109/glocomw.2011.6162356Hui, X., Zhigang, Z., & Xueguang, Z. (2009). A Novel Routing Protocol in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Ant Colony Optimization. 2009 International Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology. doi:10.1109/esiat.2009.460AbdelSalam, H. S., & Olariu, S. (2012). BEES: BioinspirEd backbonE Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 23(1), 44-51. doi:10.1109/tpds.2011.100Da Silva Rego, A., Celestino, J., dos Santos, A., Cerqueira, E. C., Patel, A., & Taghavi, M. (2012). BEE-C: A bio-inspired energy efficient cluster-based algorithm for data continuous dissemination in Wireless Sensor Networks. 2012 18th IEEE International Conference on Networks (ICON). doi:10.1109/icon.2012.6506592Neshat, M., Sepidnam, G., Sargolzaei, M., & Toosi, A. N. (2012). Artificial fish swarm algorithm: a survey of the state-of-the-art, hybridization, combinatorial and indicative applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4), 965-997. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9342-2Antoniou, P., Pitsillides, A., Blackwell, T., & Engelbrecht, A. (2009). Employing the flocking behavior of birds for controlling congestion in autonomous decentralized networks. 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. doi:10.1109/cec.2009.4983153Ruihua, Z., Zhiping, J., Xin, L., & Dongxue, H. (2011). Double cluster-heads clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks using PSO. 2011 6th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. doi:10.1109/iciea.2011.5975688Kulkarni, R. V., Venayagamoorthy, G. K., & Cheng, M. X. (2009). Bio-inspired node localization in wireless sensor networks. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/icsmc.2009.5346107Kulkarni, R. V., & Venayagamoorthy, G. K. (2010). Bio-inspired Algorithms for Autonomous Deployment and Localization of Sensor Nodes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 40(6), 663-675. doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2010.2049649Xin Song, Cuirong Wang, Wang, J., & Bin Zhang. (2010). A hierarchical routing protocol based on AFSO algorithm for WSN. 2010 International Conference On Computer Design and Applications. doi:10.1109/iccda.2010.5541265Gao, X. Z., Wu, Y., Zenger, K., & Huang, X. (2010). A Knowledge-Based Artificial Fish-Swarm Algorithm. 2010 13th IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering. doi:10.1109/cse.2010.49Wang, L., & Ma, L. (2011). A hybrid artificial fish swarm algorithm for Bin-packing problem. Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology. doi:10.1109/emeit.2011.6022829Yiyue, W., Hongmei, L., & Hengyang, H. (2012). Wireless Sensor Network Deployment Using an Optimized Artificial Fish Swarm Algorithm. 2012 International Conference on Computer Science and Electronics Engineering. doi:10.1109/iccsee.2012.453Yang, X.-S. (2010). A New Metaheuristic Bat-Inspired Algorithm. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 65-74. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6Goyal, S., & Patterh, M. S. (2013). Performance of BAT Algorithm on Localization of Wireless Sensor Network. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS & TECHNOLOGY, 6(3), 351-358. doi:10.24297/ijct.v6i3.4481Krishnanand, K. N., & Ghose, D. (2006). Glowworm swarm based optimization algorithm for multimodal functions with collective robotics applications. Multiagent and Grid Systems, 2(3), 209-222. doi:10.3233/mgs-2006-2301Apostolopoulos, T., & Vlachos, A. (2011). Application of the Firefly Algorithm for Solving the Economic Emissions Load Dispatch Problem. International Journal of Combinatorics, 2011, 1-23. doi:10.1155/2011/523806Liao, W.-H., Kao, Y., & Li, Y.-S. (2011). A sensor deployment approach using glowworm swarm optimization algorithm in wireless sensor networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 12180-12188. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.053Sun, Y., Jiang, Q., & Zhang, K. (2012). A clustering scheme for Reachback Firefly Synchronicity in wireless sensor networks. 2012 3rd IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content. doi:10.1109/icnidc.2012.6418705Zungeru, A. M., Ang, L.-M., & Seng, K. P. (2012). Termite-Hill. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research, 3(4), 1-22. doi:10.4018/jsir.2012100101KumarE, S., S. M., K., & Kumar B. P., V. (2014). Clustering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks based on Rhesus Macaque (Macaca mulatta) Animal's Social Behavior. International Journal of Computer Applications, 87(8), 20-27. doi:10.5120/15229-3754Breza, M., & McCann, J. A. (2008). Lessons in Implementing Bio-inspired Algorithms on Wireless Sensor Networks. 2008 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems. doi:10.1109/ahs.2008.72Aziz, N. A. B. A., Mohemmed, A. W., & Sagar, B. S. D. (2007). Particle Swarm Optimization and Voronoi diagram for Wireless Sensor Networks coverage optimization. 2007 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems. doi:10.1109/icias.2007.4658528Falcon, R., Li, X., Nayak, A., & Stojmenovic, I. (2012). A harmony-seeking firefly swarm to the periodic replacement of damaged sensors by a team of mobile robots. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). doi:10.1109/icc.2012.6363859Antoniou, P., & Pitsillides, A. (2010). A bio-inspired approach for streaming applications in wireless sensor networks based on the Lotka–Volterra competition model. Computer Communications, 33(17), 2039-2047. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2010.07.020Benahmed, K., Merabti, M., & Haffaf, H. (2012). Inspired Social Spider Behavior for Secure Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications, 4(4), 1-10. doi:10.4018/jmcmc.2012100101Alrajeh, N. A., & Lloret, J. (2013). Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(10), 351047. doi:10.1155/2013/351047Hussain, S., Matin, A. W., & Islam, O. (2007). Genetic Algorithm for Hierarchical Wireless Sensor Networks. Journal of Networks, 2(5). doi:10.4304/jnw.2.5.87-97Hussain, S., Matin, A. W., & Islam, O. (2007). Genetic Algorithm for Energy Efficient Clusters in Wireless Sensor Networks. Fourth International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG’07). doi:10.1109/itng.2007.97Ferentinos, K. P., & Tsiligiridis, T. A. (2007). Adaptive design optimization of wireless sensor networks using genetic algorithms. Computer Networks, 51(4), 1031-1051. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2006.06.013Jia, J., Chen, J., Chang, G., & Tan, Z. (2009). Energy efficient coverage control in wireless sensor networks based on multi-objective genetic algorithm. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 57(11-12), 1756-1766. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2008.10.036Nan, G.-F., Li, M.-Q., & Li, J. (2007). Estimation of Node Localization with a Real-Coded Genetic Algorithm in WSNs. 2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. doi:10.1109/icmlc.2007.4370265Saleem, K., Fisal, N., Abdullah, M. S., Zulkarmwan, A. B., Hafizah, S., & Kamilah, S. (2009). Proposed Nature Inspired Self-Organized Secure Autonomous Mechanism for WSNs. 2009 First Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems. doi:10.1109/aciids.2009.75Jabbari, A., & Lang, W. (2010). Advanced Bio-inspired Plausibility Checking in a Wireless Sensor Network Using Neuro-immune Systems: Autonomous Fault Diagnosis in an Intelligent Transportation System. 2010 Fourth International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications. doi:10.1109/sensorcomm.2010.24Ponnusamy, V., & Abdullah, A. (2010). Biologically Inspired (Botany) Mobile Agent Based Self-Healing Wireless Sensor Network. 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Environments. doi:10.1109/ie.2010.46Li, J., Cui, Z., & Shi, Z. (2012). An Improved Artificial Plant Optimization Algorithm for Coverage Problem in WSN. Sensor Letters, 10(8), 1874-1878. doi:10.1166/sl.2012.2627Sendra, S., Llario, F., Parra, L., & Lloret, J. (2014). Smart Wireless Sensor Network to Detect and Protect Sheep and Goats to Wolf Attacks. Recent Advances in Communications and Networking Technology, 2(2), 91-101. doi:10.2174/22117407112016660012Sendra, S., Granell, E., Lloret, J., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2013). Smart Collaborative Mobile System for Taking Care of Disabled and Elderly People. Mobile Networks and Applications, 19(3), 287-302. doi:10.1007/s11036-013-0445-zGarcia, M., Sendra, S., Lloret, G., & Lloret, J. (2011). Monitoring and control sensor system for fish feeding in marine fish farms. IET Communications, 5(12), 1682-1690. doi:10.1049/iet-com.2010.0654Sendra, S., Lloret, J., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Aguiar, J. M. (2013). Underwater Wireless Communications in Freshwater at 2.4 GHz. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(9), 1794-1797. doi:10.1109/lcomm.2013.072313.131214Lloret, J., Sendra, S., Ardid, M., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2012). Underwater Wireless Sensor Communications in the 2.4 GHz ISM Frequency Band. Sensors, 12(4), 4237-4264. doi:10.3390/s12040423

Wearable device adoption among older adults: A mixed-methods study

Recently, the popularity of smart wearable technologies, such as Fitbit, has significantly increased. There are numerous potential benefits in using these devices, especially among seniors. Yet, little is known about seniors’ adoption behavior. Through a mixed-methods approach, this study investigates the factors that impact seniors’ intention to use wearable devices. Results from an online survey and interviews showed that seniors’ perception of the complexity of working with these devices is a barrier to their adoption decisions. Looking more deeply into the role of complexity revealed that seniors’ concern about the complexity of reading and interpreting the output of wearable devices is the main deterring element. Furthermore, we explored the role of two important elements: seniors’ cognitive age, and the influence of their subjective well-being on their adoption behavior. Results demonstrated that cognitive age does not significantly impact use intention by itself; nonetheless, subjective well-being moderates its effect. This result revealed an interesting finding, which is that the influence of cognitive age on seniors’ use intention depends on seniors’ level of subjective well-being. When seniors’ subjective well-being is low, surprisingly, cognitive age increases seniors’ intention to use the device. These findings provide interesting implications for practice and future research

Group bundling versus traditional bundling in e-commerce: A field experiment

Selling in bundles has been argued to lead to more and earlier sales in promotion and clearance campaigns, which could improve inventory turnover, capacity utilization, and profitability. However, recent findings suggest that bundle promotions have limited ability in achieving such outcomes because of the quantity requirement in traditional bundling (purchasing a quantity of two or more for consumers to qualify for the bundle discount), which deter non-buyers to become buyers. A recently proposed method (group bundling) promises to alleviate the quantity requirement while maintaining the bundling benefits both to consumers (discounts) and to retailers (minimum sales volume). However, there has been neither theoretical explanation nor empirical validation of the method's advantage/disadvantage, a gap that this paper fills. The results of a field experiment we conducted on the e-commerce operation of a gym suggests that group bundling does have a relative advantage in driving consumers' intention to buy online bundles

Social bundling: A novel method to enhance consumers’ intention to purchase online bundles

Bundling in retail has been argued to improve sales volume and speed, which can improve retailers’ operation performance. However, recent research finds that the purchase quantity requirement in traditional bundling deters non-buyers from becoming buyers. This paper proposes “social bundling,” as a novel method that all

Harnessing HyDRO: harvesting-aware Data ROuting for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks

We demonstrate the feasibility of long lasting underwater networking by proposing the smart exploitation of the energy harvesting capabilities of underwater sensor nodes. We define a data routing framework that allows senders to select the best forwarding relay taking into account both residual energy and foreseeable harvestable energy. Our forwarding method, named HyDRO, for Harvesting-aware Data ROuting, is also configured to consider channel conditions and route-wide residual energy, performing network wide optimization via local information sharing. The performance of our protocol is evaluated via simulations in scenarios modeled to include realistic underwater settings as well as energy harvesting based on recorded traces. HyDRO is compared to state-of-the-art forwarding protocols for underwater networks. Our results show that jointly considering residual and predicted energy availability is key to achieve lower energy consumption and latency, while obtaining much higher packet delivery ratio