Corporate social responsibility in professional team sport organisations: Toward a theory of decision-making

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is increasingly important to business, including professional team sport organisations. Scholars focusing on CSR in sport have generally examined content related issues such as implementation, motives or outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to add to that body of knowledge by focusing on process related issues. Specifically we explore the decision-making process used in relation to CSR-related programs in the charitable foundations of the English football clubs. Employing a grounded theory method and drawing on the analysis and synthesis of 32 interviews and 25 organisational documents, this research explored managerial decision-making with regard to CSR in English football. The findings reveal that decision-making consists of four simultaneous micro-social processes (‘harmonising’, ‘safeguarding’, ‘manoeuvring’, and ‘transcending’) that form the platform upon which the managers in the charitable foundations of the English football clubs make decisions. These four micro-social processes together represent assessable transcendence; a process that is, fortified by passion, contingent on trust, sustained by communication and substantiated by factual performance enables CSR formulation and implementation in this organisational context. The significance of this study for the sport management literature is three-fold: (a) it focuses on the individual level of analysis, (b) it shifts the focus of the scholarly activity away from CSR content-based research towards more process-oriented approaches and (c) it adds to the limited number of studies that have utilised grounded theory in a rounded manner

Publikationsindikatoren und die Stabilität wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenrankings

The output of single researchers or departments can be measured by the number of publications in journals. Due to heterogenity in the quality of journals the publications must be weighted. The quality of a journal can be determined on the basis of citation analysis, by reputation or by the quality of the review process. We present rankings of German business and economics journals based on citation analysis for the last three decades of the twentieth century respectively. If used for decision making in universities journal rankings must be robust in respect to method and over time. Using correlation analysis we find that rankings of German business journals are very robust in respect to both method and time. Rankings of German economics journals are not as robust as business journals but still show positive correlations over time and with different methods