4 research outputs found

    Towards defining persistent critical illness and other varieties of chronic critical illness

    No full text
    We hypothesise that there exists a substantial and growing group of “persistently critically ill” patients who appear to be intensive care unit-dependent because of a cascade of critical illnesses rather than their original ICU admitting diagnosis. These persistently critically ill patients are those who remain in the ICU because of ongoing complications of care that continue after their reason for admission has been treated and is no longer active. We believe such patients can be distinguished from patients currently labelled as “chronic critical illness” or “prolonged mechanical ventilation”. We further believe that their primary problem is not simply failure to wean from mechanical ventilation due to muscle weakness and impaired gas exchange. We outline a program of clinician consultation, epidemiological research, consensus conference and validation to develop a useful definition of persistent critical illness, with the aim of supporting investigations in preventing persistence, and improving the care of patients so affected

    Biodiversity in the context of ecosystem services

    No full text
    The term ‘biodiversity’ describes the diversity of life on Earth. Diversity can occur at a number of levels of biological organisation, from genes, through to individuals, populations, species, communities and entire ecosystems

    Supplemental parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: A study protocol for a phase II randomised controlled trial

    No full text
    Background: Nutrition is one of the fundamentals of care provided to critically ill adults. The volume of enteral nutrition received, however, is often much less than prescribed due to multiple functional and process issues. To deliver the prescribed volume and correct the energy deficit associated with enteral nutrition alone, parenteral nutrition can be used in combination (termed "supplemental parenteral nutrition"), but benefits of this method have not been firmly established. A multi-centre, randomised, clinical trial is currently underway to determine if prescribed energy requirements can be provided to critically ill patients by using a supplemental parenteral nutrition strategy in the critically ill. Methods/design: This prospective, multi-centre, randomised, stratified, parallel-group, controlled, phase II trial aims to determine whether a supplemental parenteral nutrition strategy will reliably and safely increase energy intake when compared to usual care. The study will be conducted for 100 critically ill adults with at least one organ system failure and evidence of insufficient enteral intake from six intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. Enrolled patients will be allocated to either a supplemental parenteral nutrition strategy for 7 days post randomisation or to usual care with enteral nutrition. The primary outcome will be the average energy amount delivered from nutrition therapy over the first 7 days of the study period. Secondary outcomes include protein delivery for 7 days post randomisation; total energy and protein delivery, antibiotic use and organ failure rates (up to 28 days); duration of ventilation, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay. At both intensive care unit and hospital discharge strength and health-related quality of life assessments will be undertaken. Study participants will be followed up for health-related quality of life, resource utilisation and survival at 90 and 180 days post randomisation (unless death occurs first). Discussion: This trial aims to determine if provision of a supplemental parenteral nutrition strategy to critically ill adults will increase energy intake compared to usual care in Australia and New Zealand. Trial outcomes will guide development of a subsequent larger randomised controlled trial. Trial registration:NCT01847534(First registered 5 February 2013, last updated 14 October 2015
    corecore