24 research outputs found

    PHTLS ® (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany – who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to examine PHTLS Provider courses in Germany and to proof the assumption that formation of physicians and paramedics in prehospital trauma care can be optimized. METHODS: PHTLS participants were asked to fill out standardized questionnaires during their course preparation and directly after the course. There were some open questions regarding their professional background and closed questions concerning PHTLS itself. Further questions were to be answered on an analog scale in order to quantify subjective impressions of confidence, knowledge and also to describe individual levels of education and training. RESULTS: 247 questionnaires could be analyzed. Physicians noted significant (p < 0.001) more deficits in their professional training than paramedics. 80% of the paramedics affirmed to have had adequate training with respect to prehospital trauma care, all physicians claimed not to have had sufficient training for prehospital trauma care situations at Medical School. Physicians were statistically most significant dissatisfied then paramedics (p < 0.001). While most participants gave positive feedback, anesthetists were less convinced of PHTLS (p = 0.005), didn’t benefit as much as the rest (p = 0.004) and stated more often, that the course was of less value for their daily work (p = 0.03). After the course confidence increased remarkably and reached higher rates than before the course (p < 0.001). After PHTLS both groups showed similar ratings concerning the course concept indicating that PHTLS could equalize some training deficits and help to gain confidence and assurance in prehospital trauma situations. 90% of the paramedics and 100% of the physicians would recommend PHTLS. Physicians and especially anesthetists revised their opinions with regard to providing PHTLS at Medical School after having taken part in a PHTLS course. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of PHTLS courses in Germany indicates the necessity for special prehospital trauma care training. Paramedics and physicians criticize deficits in their professional training, which can be compensated by PHTLS. With respect to relevant items like confidence and knowledge PHTLS leads to a statistically significant increase in ratings on a visual analogue scale. PHTLS should be integrated into the curriculum at Medical School

    Comparing the Short-Term Outcome after Polytrauma and Proximal Femur Fracture in Geriatric Patients

    No full text
    Because of demographic change, geriatric patients are becoming a major challenge for traumatology. Multiple trauma patients and patients with proximal femoral fractures are important groups of patients in geriatric traumatology. This retrospective study compares two patient groups with different severities of injuries, and analyzes their patient characteristics and short-term outcomes, focusing on functionality upon discharge. The investigation aims to present the characterizing features of both patient groups, and to identify the potential risk factors for early functionality after trauma. The patient collective comprises two patient groups: a polytrauma group with 91 patients, and a femoral fracture group with 132 patients. Under the control of potential influencing factors, the present study showed no significant influence of belonging to either of the patient groups (multiple trauma or proximal femoral fracture) on the mobility status at discharge. Age, known dementia, pre-clinical intubation, and the lowest Hb value were identified as significant influencing factors. Despite their old age and vulnerability, the majority of geriatric patients survive accidents. Further prospective investigations concerning the maintenance or restoration of functionality after an accident are therefore desirable

    Pay for performance – motivation to succeed in Advanced Trauma Life Support courses – a question of background or funding?

    No full text
    Objective: To correlate students’ performance with their professional background and motivation to take part in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses. We base our analysis on the self-determination theory that differentiates intrinsic (ambition to perform by individual itself) from extrinsic motivation (incentive by external stimuli).Design: We present a non-blinded, monocentric, non-randomized descriptive study of 376 students taking part in an ATLS course at one course site in Germany. Part of a two-day ATLS course are two written tests; we correlate test scores with background information provided by the students in a questionnaire of 13 items (age, sex, adress, board certification, specialty, subspecialty, position, hospital level of care, hospital operator and hospital participation in trauma network, motivation, funding source, condition of funding).Setting: The students were recuited at the BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen (Germany), a large 528-bed trauma center and one of 13 ATLS course sites in Germany.Participants: 449 ATLS course students taking part in ATLS courses at the above-mentioned course site from February 2009 to May 2010 were sent a questionnaire asking for their background. All 449 course students were eligible to participate. 376 (83.7%) questionnaires were returned, pre- and post-test results of all students aquired and included into our calculations. 312 (83%) were male and 64 (17%) female. The majority (59.3%) of recruited students came from trauma surgery, 21.8% from anesthesiology, 8% from general surgery, 4% from abdominal surgery, 0.5% from vascular or thoracic surgery each and 5.9% from other specialties.Results: Neither age, sex, subspecialty, hospital level of care, hospital operator, or hospital participation in trauma network played a role with respect to motivation or test results. The high degree of intrinsic motivation of consultants (92.3%) had no impact on their test results. Anesthesiologists were higher motivated (75.6% intrinsically motivated) in contrast to all surgical colleagues (63.6%), which showed significant differences in the pre- (89.8% vs. 85.3%, p=0.03) but not the post-test. Of all 13.6% students who were self-payers, 94.1% were intrinsically motivated; the 86.2% whose course fee was accounted for were less likely to be intrinsically motivated (63.9%). Sponsoring however did not have a negative impact on test results. Conditional funding (sponsored only on passing both tests) was detrimental to motivation: 0% of these individuals were intrinsically motivated and they scored significantly lower (82.5%) than all other students in the post-test (86.9%, p=0.002). Overall, intrinsically motivated students overtopped extrinsically motivated students in the post-test (88.0% vs. 83.4%, p<0.001).Conclusions: ATLS course participation is not compulsory for medical doctors in Germany. Intrinsic motivation to take part in these courses is a key prerequisite to increase performance, irrespective of the background of the students. Intrinsically motivated students are ready to invest into their education and vice versa. Conditional funding (course fee only sponsored on passing the course) evokes no intrinsic motivation at all and causes worse results

    4th International Conference Initial Stages in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions

    No full text
    Abstract Background Prehospital trauma care is stressful and requires multi-professional teamwork. A decrease in the number of accident victims ultimately affects the routine and skills and underlines the importance of effective training. Standardized courses, like PHTLS, are established for health care professionals to improve the prehospital care of trauma patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the subjective safety in prehospital trauma care and learning progress by paramedics in a longitudinal analysis. Methods This was a prospective intervention trial and part of the mixed-method longitudinal EPPTC-trial, evaluating subjective and objective changes among participants and real patient care as a result of PHTLS courses. Participants were evaluated with pre/post questionnaires as well as one year after the course. Results We included 236 datasets. In the pre/post comparison, an increased performance could be observed in nearly all cases. The result shows that the expectations of the participants of the course were fully met even after one year (p = 0.002). The subjective safety in trauma care is significantly better even one year after the course (p < 0.001). Regression analysis showed that (ABCDE)-structure is decisive (p = 0.036) as well as safety in rare and common skills (both p < 0.001). Most skills are also rated better after one year. Knowledge and specific safety are assessed as worse after one year. Conclusion The courses meet the expectations of the participants and increase the subjective safety in the prehospital care of trauma patients. ABCDE-structure and safety in skills are crucial. In the short term, both safety in skills and knowledge can be increased, but the courses do not have the power to maintain knowledge and specific subjective safety issues over a year. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, ID DRKS00004713 , registered 14. February 201

    Application of Cervical Collars - An Analysis of Practical Skills of Professional Emergency Medical Care Providers.

    No full text
    The application of a cervical collar is a standard procedure in trauma patients in emergency medicine. It is often observed that cervical collars are applied incorrectly, resulting in reduced immobilization of the cervical spine. The objective of this study was to analyze the practical skills of trained professional rescue personnel concerning the application of cervical collars.Within emergency medical conferences, n = 104 voluntary test subjects were asked to apply a cervical collar to a training doll, wherein each step that was performed received an evaluation. Furthermore, personal and occupational data of all study participants were collected using a questionnaire.The test subjects included professional rescue personnel (80.8%) and emergency physicians (12.5%). The average occupational experience of all study participants in pre-clinical emergency care was 11.1±8.9 years. Most study participants had already attended a certified training on trauma care (61%) and felt "very confident" in handling a cervical collar (84%). 11% applied the cervical collar to the training doll without errors. The most common error consisted of incorrect adjustment of the size of the cervical collar (66%). No association was found between the correct application of the cervical collar and the occupational group of the test subjects (trained rescue personnel vs. emergency physicians) or the participation in certified trauma courses.Despite pronounced subjective confidence regarding the application of cervical collars, this study allows the conclusion that there are general deficits in practical skills when cervical collars are applied. A critical assessment of the current training contents on the subject of trauma care must, therefore, be demanded

    Performance Assessment of Emergency Teams and Communication in Trauma Care (PERFECT checklist)-Explorative analysis, development and validation of the PERFECT checklist: Part of the prospective longitudinal mixed-methods EPPTC trial

    No full text
    BACKGROUND:Trainings in emergency medicine are well structured, but examinations are rarely validated. We are evaluating the impact of pre-hospital emergency trainings on participants and patient care and developed and validated a checklist to assess emergency trainings. METHODS:We used videos recorded at the time points directly before (t0), directly after (t1), and one year after (t2) training to develop the PERFECT checklist (Performance Assessment of Emergency Teams and Communication in Trauma Care). The videos were assessed using semi-qualitative/linguistic analysis as well as expert panel appraisal and recommendations using the Delphi method. The checklist was tested for validity and reliability. RESULTS:The inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99) and internal consistency (α = 0.99) were high. Concurrent validity was moderate to high (r = 0.65 -r = 0.93 (p<0.001)). We included scales for procedures, non-technical skills, technical skills and global performance. The procedures were done faster in the mean over the timeline (t0: 2:29, 95%CI 1:54-3:03 min., t1: 1:11, 95%C 0:53-1:30 min, t2: 1:14, 95%CI 0:56-1:31 min.). All experts rated the recorded scenarios at t0 with the lowest sum score (mean 31±8), with a significantly better performance of the teams at t1 (mean 69±7). The performance at t2 (mean 66 ± 13) was slightly lower than at t1, but still better than at t0. At t1 and t2, linguistic analysis showed a change in the team leaders communication behaviour, which can be interpreted as a surrogate parameter for reduced stress. CONCLUSION:The PERFECT checklist has a good validity and high reliability for assessing trauma procedures and teamwork

    Die Wertigkeit des gemeinsamen Faches Orthopädie-Unfallchirurgie im 2. Staatsexamen – Vergleich der schriftlichen 2. Staatsexamina mit dem Nationalen Kompetenzbasierten Lernzielkatalog Chirurgie

    No full text
    Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Der Nationale Kompetenzbasierte Lernzielkatalog Chirurgie (NKLC) definiert für jedes seiner 230 Lernziele eine Kompetenzebene von „Kompetenzebene 1: Faktenwissen“ bis zu „Kompetenzebene 3: selbstständiges Handeln“. Trotz des erwiesenen Einflusses von summativen Prüfungen auf das Lernverhalten von Studierenden bilden diese Lernziele nicht die Grundlage für das 2. Staatsexamen. Die vorliegende Studie untersucht, inwiefern die Prüfungsfragen des 2. Staatsexamens bereits die orthopädisch-unfallchirurgischen Lernziele des NKLC adressieren und welche thematische Schwerpunktsetzung hierbei erfolgt. Material und Methoden Es erfolgte eine retrospektive Analyse basierend auf den Examensfragen von Herbst (H) 2009 bis Herbst 2014 (n = 11). Zunächst wurden im NKLC durch 5 Ober- und Fachärzte die Lernziele aus den Bereichen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie identifiziert. Nachfolgend wurden aus den 11 untersuchten Staatsexamina die Fragen definiert, die sich auf die orthopädisch-unfallchirurgischen Lernziele bezogen. Analysiert wurden die Gesamtzahl der Fragen, die Anzahl der Fragen pro Examen sowie pro Lernziel und Kompetenzebene. Ergebnisse Insgesamt konnten 113 Lernziele des NKLC (entspricht 49,1% aller Lernziele des NKLC) dem Fach Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie zugeordnet werden. Im Studienzeitraum adressierten 543 Fragen diese 113 Lernziele (entspricht 15,6% aller 3480 Fragen). Pro Examen konnten durchschnittlich 49,36 ± 14,1 (Min. 30; Max. 80) Fragen mit Bezug zu Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie identifiziert werden. Insgesamt wurden 13,45 ± 6,39 (Min. 6; Max. 24) Fragen zu Lernzielen (LZ) der Kompetenzebene 3a und b, 21,45 ± 9,94 (Min. 9; Max. 39) Fragen zu LZ der Kompetenzebene 2 und 14,45 ± 6,36 (Min. 6; Max. 25) Fragen zu LZ der Kompetenzebene 1 gestellt. Die Mehrheit der Fragen adressierten „Erkrankungen des rheumatischen Formenkreises“ (n = 16 im Herbst 2009). Schlussfolgerung Die Anzahl der Fragen mit unfallchirurgisch-orthopädischem Schwerpunkt im 2. Staatsexamen erscheint in Relation zur Gesamtzahl aller gestellten Fragen ausreichend hoch. Allerdings liegt eine thematische Imbalance vor, und gerade klinisch wichtige Lernziele mit hoher Kompetenzebene werden nicht ausreichend häufig geprüft. Eine bessere Abstimmung der Staatsprüfung mit den Lernzielkatalogen ist erforderlich.</jats:p

    Influence of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on bone turnover markers in organisms with normal and low bone mineral density during fracture healing: a randomized clinical trial

    No full text
    Background: Low bone mineral density (BMD) leads to metaphyseal fractures, which are considered of delayed, qualitatively reduced healing resulting in prolonged care phases and increased socioeconomic costs. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is already approved to support bone healing of pseudarthrosis and delayed unions. With this study, we examined its influence on bone turnover markers (BTM) during fracture healing in patients with low and normal BMD. Methods: Within a period of 2 years, patients with a metaphyseal fracture of the distal radius or the proximal humerus, requiring surgical osteosynthesis were included into the study. Patients were randomized within their fracture groups whether they received ESWT after surgery or not. ESWT was applied once after surgery with an energy flux density (EFD) of 0.55 mJ/mm² à 3000 shockwaves. In addition, serum levels of vitamin D3, parathyroid hormone (iPTH), bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), c-telopeptide of type-I-collagen (β-CTX) and serum band 5 tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRAP5b) were determined before surgery and post-operatively in week 1, 4, 8, 52. T-score levels as an indicator of the BMD were measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: 49 patients (40 females, 9 males; mean age 62 years) with fractures of the metaphyseal distal radius (n=25) or the proximal humerus (n=24) were included in the study. The follow-up time was one year. 24 of them were diagnosed of having low BMD, whereas 25 had a normal BMD. During follow-up time serum levels of bone turnover markers, as well as vitamin D3 and iPTH, showed no significant changes; however, ESWT approaches the decreased serum levels of patients with low BMD to the level of healthy organisms.Conclusions: ESWT as treatment option of fractures in patients with low BMD can lead to an equilibration of levels of bone turnover markers to the levels of patients with normal BMD
    corecore