Translational toxicology in setting occupational exposure limits for dusts and hazard classification – a critical evaluation of a recent approach to translate dust overload findings from rats to humans

Background We analyze the scientific basis and methodology used by the German MAK Commission in their recommendations for exposure limits and carcinogen classification of “granular biopersistent particles without known specific toxicity” (GBS). These recommendations are under review at the European Union level. We examine the scientific assumptions in an attempt to reproduce the results. MAK’s human equivalent concentrations (HECs) are based on a particle mass and on a volumetric model in which results from rat inhalation studies are translated to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) and a carcinogen classification. Methods We followed the methods as proposed by the MAK Commission and Pauluhn 2011. We also examined key assumptions in the metrics, such as surface area of the human lung, deposition fractions of inhaled dusts, human clearance rates; and risk of lung cancer among workers, presumed to have some potential for lung overload, the physiological condition in rats associated with an increase in lung cancer risk. Results The MAK recommendations on exposure limits for GBS have numerous incorrect assumptions that adversely affect the final results. The procedures to derive the respirable occupational exposure limit (OEL) could not be reproduced, a finding raising considerable scientific uncertainty about the reliability of the recommendations. Moreover, the scientific basis of using the rat model is confounded by the fact that rats and humans show different cellular responses to inhaled particles as demonstrated by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) studies in both species. Conclusion Classifying all GBS as carcinogenic to humans based on rat inhalation studies in which lung overload leads to chronic inflammation and cancer is inappropriate. Studies of workers, who have been exposed to relevant levels of dust, have not indicated an increase in lung cancer risk. Using the methods proposed by the MAK, we were unable to reproduce the OEL for GBS recommended by the Commission, but identified substantial errors in the models. Considerable shortcomings in the use of lung surface area, clearance rates, deposition fractions; as well as using the mass and volumetric metrics as opposed to the particle surface area metric limit the scientific reliability of the proposed GBS OEL and carcinogen classification.International Carbon Black Associatio

Inhaled aerosol particle dosimetry in mice: A review

The availability of molecular and genetic tools has made the mouse the most common animal model for a variety of human diseases in toxicology studies. However, little is known about the factors that will influence the dose delivery to murine lungs during an inhalation study. Among these factors are the respiratory tract anatomy, lung physiology, and clearance characteristics. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to briefly review the current knowledge on the aforementioned factors in mice and their implications to the dose delivered to mouse models during inhalation studies. Representative scientific publications were chosen from searches using the NCBI PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. Relevant respiratory physiological differences have been widely reported for different mouse strains and sexes. The limited data on anatomical morphometry that is available for the murine respiratory tract indicates significant differences between mouse strains. These differences have implications to the dose delivered and the biological outcomes of inhalation studies

New developments in aerosol dosimetry

Dosimetry provides information linking environmental exposures to sites of deposition, removal from these sites, and translocation of deposited materials. Dosimetry also aids in extrapolating laboratory animal and in vitro data to humans. Recent progress has shed light on: properties of particles in relation to their fates in the body; influence of age, gender, body size, and lung diseases on inhaled particle doses; particle movement to the brain via the olfactory nerves; and particle deposition hot spots in the respiratory tract. Ultrafine size has emerged as an important dosimetric characteristic. Particle count, composition, and surface properties are recognized as potentially important toxicology-related considerations. Differences in body size influence airway sizes, inhaled particle deposition, specific ventilation, and specific doses (e.g. per unit body mass). Related to body size, age, gender, species, and strain are also dosimetric considerations. Diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchitis, produce uneven doses within the respiratory tract. Traditional concepts of the translocation and clearance of deposited particles have been challenged. Ultrafine particles can translocate to the brain via olfactory nerves, and from the lung to other organs. The clearance rates of particles from tracheobronchial airways are slowed by respiratory tract infections, but newer evidence implies that slow particle clearance from this region also exists in healthy lungs. Finally, hot spots of particle deposition are seen in hollow models, lung tissue, and dosimetric simulations. Local doses to groups of epithelial cells can be much greater than those to surrounding cells. The new insights challenge dosimetry scientists